• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
Low Funding, Fewer Deep Retrofits Limit Gains from Canada Greener Homes Program November 30, 2023
Toronto Lands Transit Funding as Ottawa Council ‘Ties Hands’ with Budget Deficits November 29, 2023
Yukon Falls Short on Renewables as Climate Council Maps Decarbonization Path November 29, 2023
Water Profits, Shortages Imperil Communities Near Two Mighty Rivers November 29, 2023
Squamish Council Supports Lawsuit Against Big Oil November 29, 2023
Next
Prev

Youth Climate Case Gets Back on Track After Supreme Court Rejects Trump Administration Delay

November 5, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

Litigants Nelson Kanuk l, Oregon litigants Nelson Kanuk (l), Kelsey Juliana, and John Thiebes by Sam Beebe/flickr

Litigants Nelson Kanuk l, Oregon litigants Nelson Kanuk (l), Kelsey Juliana, and John Thiebes by Sam Beebe/flickr

12
SHARES

They haven’t even had a full court hearing yet, but the 21 youth behind a climate justice case against the United States government are already racking up an impressive record of wins before the U.S. Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On Friday, both benches rejected the Trump administration’s latest attempt to kill the landmark case before it could go to trial.

“The youth of our nation won an important decision today from the Supreme Court that shows even the most powerful government in the world must follow the rules and process of litigation in our democracy,” said Julia Olson, co-counsel for the youth and executive director of Our Children’s Trust. As soon as the court decision landed, the youth filed a District Court request for an immediate case conference to get the case back on track.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Juliana v. United States was previously scheduled for a hearing October 29, after multiple government delays dating back to the term of President Barack Obama. The plaintiffs had bought their train tickets to Eugene, Oregon, where Judge Ann Aiken was to hear arguments. Then Washington tried one more time to cancel the trial before it could start.

Initially, Chief Justice John Roberts “granted a request two weeks ago by the Trump administration to stay discovery and trial pending review of its latest petition to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus—a rarely used extraordinary appeal that asks a higher court to overrule a lower court before a trial has concluded,” Climate Liability News reports.

But “after the plaintiffs filed their response, Roberts referred the matter to the full court, which issued Friday’s ruling. Only justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the government’s request to stop the trial, far short of the majority needed.” The Ninth Circuit ruled Friday, as well.

On the day the trial was to begin, Climate Liability News took a closer look at the “uncharted territory” Juliana has already opened up for climate litigation, and why successive U.S. administrations have fought so hard to block the case.

“The plaintiffs, who come from communities around the country already dealing with debilitating effects of climate change, allege that the federal government is violating their Constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property by promoting a fossil fuel-based energy system that exacerbates climate change,” wrote reporter Karen Savage. “Their suit, filed in 2015, successfully convinced a U.S. District Court judge to order the case to trial,” and had survived every attempt to quash it.

“Why the government appears so frantic to avoid the trial has been an overriding, and unanswered, question,” Savage added. “But part of the reason could be that the case puts the government in an uncomfortable legal position. Much of the evidence used by the young people to prove they are being harmed by climate change comes from the government itself.”

Even the Trump administration’s recent motion to exclude expert testimony in the case admitted that climate change is causing “polar ice melt, earlier annual snow melt, reduced snowpack, sea level rise, sea temperature increases, threats to coastal cities, adverse impacts to coral reefs and the life they support, more powerful storms and hurricanes, wildfires, drought, floods, and a variety of other impacts.”

With the government acknowledging the reality of climate change so much clearly in court than it does in everyday life, “what’s tricky for the Juliana plaintiffs is not the facts, it’s the law—is there actually a claim you can bring that the United States has this essentially fiduciary or trust obligation to future generations to protect the planet,” said Ann Carlson co-director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA law school.

“That’s the fundamental argument of the plaintiffs, and whether that has a basis in the Constitution is a tricky question.”

Lawsuits against the U.S. government usually focus on technical regulations and interpretation of statutes. “In this case, the evidence the plaintiffs are seeking to put on trial is much more dramatic, and the plaintiffs are much more sympathetic than is typical,” Carlson said. “You have 21 kids, they’re kids who are from areas that are already being affected by climate change, you have world-renowned scientists who are going to have an opportunity to testify about what is happening with climate change and why it’s so serious, and we don’t usually see that kind of evidence put on.”

Michael Burger, executive director of Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, said that unique narrative will likely help the plaintiffs at trial. Their case is “that this government—and its various departments and agencies—has long known about the extraordinary risks that climate change poses both to individuals living today and to future generations,” he told CLN. “[It] has fundamentally failed to take adequate actions to address those harms, and has in fact made affirmative decisions that have made the problem worse. And the law provides a means to constrain government and to force action. I think that’s a very powerful narrative.”



in Environmental Justice, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

WayNorth Enterprises/Twitter
Heat & Power

Yukon Falls Short on Renewables as Climate Council Maps Decarbonization Path

November 29, 2023
1
Oak Ridge National Laboratory/wikimedia commons
Electric Mobility & Auto

North America’s First Wireless-Charging Roadway to ‘Unlock EV Adoption’

November 29, 2023
1
Brent Moore/flickr
Severe Storms & Flooding

Storm-Resistant Housing Gains Foothold in U.S. Hurricane Zones

November 29, 2023
1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Pxfuel

Coal Giants Teck, Glencore Plan Exit as Trade Group Pitches Ludicrous Clean Rebrand

November 28, 2023
446
Untrakdrover/Wikimedia Commons

Portugal Runs All-Renewable Grid for 6 Days Straight

November 23, 2023
1k
Junktuner/wikimedia commons

UAE Briefing Targets Canada for LNG Deals During COP28 Climate Discussions

November 28, 2023
322
McDonald's/flickr

McDonald’s Failing to Follow Through on Climate Promises, Critics Say

December 17, 2021
4k
Unsplash/Pixabay

‘LIKE THE TITANIC’: Climate Risk Estimates Shipwrecked by Neglect of Science

November 28, 2023
174
2happy/StockVault

Alberta Fossils Undercount Methane by 50% as Ottawa Touts New Rules

November 28, 2023
111

Recent Posts

energy efficient home retrofit

Low Funding, Fewer Deep Retrofits Limit Gains from Canada Greener Homes Program

November 30, 2023
1
TheTrolleyPole/wikimedia commons

Toronto Lands Transit Funding as Ottawa Council ‘Ties Hands’ with Budget Deficits

November 29, 2023
1
WayNorth Enterprises/Twitter

Yukon Falls Short on Renewables as Climate Council Maps Decarbonization Path

November 29, 2023
1
Oak Ridge National Laboratory/wikimedia commons

North America’s First Wireless-Charging Roadway to ‘Unlock EV Adoption’

November 29, 2023
1
Brent Moore/flickr

Storm-Resistant Housing Gains Foothold in U.S. Hurricane Zones

November 29, 2023
1
NASA/flickr

Dried Up ‘River Highway’ Spells Trouble for Mackenzie Valley Communities

November 29, 2023
1
Next Post
Department of Energy/Flickr

Canadian Fossils’ ‘Remarkable’ Production Cuts Show How a Managed Decline Could Work

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
Climate & Capital PrimaryLogo_FullColor
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2023 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

We’re glad you’re here!

But with web platforms blocking Canadian news, you may not always be able to find us. Subscribe today and never miss another story from The Energy Mix.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

Learn more about news throttling and Bill C-18

We’re glad you’re here!

But with web platforms blocking Canadian news, you may not always be able to find us. Subscribe today and never miss another story from The Energy Mix.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

Learn more about news throttling and Bill C-18

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need