Amid pushback from industry groups and both Republican and Democratic politicians, U.S. energy regulators scaled back plans late last month to consider how natural gas projects affect climate change and environmental justice.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) said a plan to consider climate effects will now be considered a draft and will only apply to future projects, The Associated Press reports.
- The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
- You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
- The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Opponents had criticized a proposal approved in February to tighten climate rules, saying it was poorly timed amid a push for increased natural gas exports following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) called the climate policy “baffling,” while Senate Energy Committee Chair Joe Manchin (D-WV) said the agency’s “reckless decision to add unnecessary roadblocks” to approval of natural gas projects “puts the security of our nation at risk.”
“At a time when we should be looking for ways to expedite the approval of these important projects, the commission has chosen on a purely partisan basis to do the exact opposite,” McConnell wrote, hours before the panel backtracked on the climate proposal.
“These policies are going to make it next to impossible to build any new natural gas infrastructure or upgrade our existing facilities in the United States,” added fossil-friendly Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), ranking Republican on the Senate energy panel.
Before the latest decision, Inside Climate News said the rule “could significantly change how natural gas pipelines are approved by the commission. Under its new approach, the commission would be required to determine whether a project is actually needed to meet the energy demands of a given region and whether it is in the public interest, with its benefits outweighing its potential adverse impacts, such as air pollution or threats to groundwater.”
FERC Chair Richard Glick said the regulation, which applied to projects emitting more than 100,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases per year, was a response to court rulings that had rejected its pipeline approvals because they didn’t fully assess whether the projects were needed.
After FERC reversed course, Glick denied climate campaigners’ contention that commissioners had bowed to political pressure.
“I’m not going to do anything for political purposes,” he told reporters, adding that he and other commissioners had had discussions with numerous pipeline and natural gas companies since the panel approved the climate policy a month earlier. Industry leaders told them the policy changes “raise additional questions that could benefit from further clarification,” Glick said.
At a February 17 meeting, the energy commission approved policy statements directing officials to consider how pipelines and other natural gas projects affect climate change and environmental justice. The statements were approved on a 3-to-2 vote along party lines, with Glick and two other Democratic commissioners supporting the policy changes and two Republicans opposed.
At the time, FERC said the new guidance would take effect immediately and apply to pending and future gas projects. The panel voted unanimously Thursday to step back from that commitment, which is now labeled as a draft and would apply only to projects filed after FERC finalizes the policy statements. The commission said it will seek further public comment before making a final decision.
FERC also approved three natural gas projects that had been pending for months. Two of the projects will expand gas production in the U.S. Gulf Coast, while the third is located in New York State. One of the projects will connect with an export terminal in Louisiana for liquefied natural gas (LNG).
President Joe Biden has pledged to planet-warming emissions from fossil fuels such as oil and gas in half by 2030. But AP says the Ukraine war has upended that focus as the administration takes steps to rein in rising energy costs and promote natural gas exports to Europe.
The U.S. sharply increased gas exports in the runup to the war and is looking for ways to “surge” LNG supplies to the European Union to help reduce its dependence on Russian gas, said White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan.
The EU imports 90% of the natural gas used to generate electricity, heat homes and supply industry, with Russia supplying almost 40% of EU gas and a quarter of its oil. European countries have responded to Putin’s invasion with plans to cut Russian gas use 65% this year and speed up adoption of renewable energy, though analysts say they could be moving faster to decarbonize.
The American Gas Association said FERC’s action to delay the climate policy was “encouraging,” adding that without changes, the plan would “actively discourage the development of pipeline infrastructure, reduce reliability, and raise consumer costs.” The industry group filed a legal challenge to the climate plan last week.
Barrasso said FERC “must go back to the drawing board and start over on these harmful proposals.”
But Kelly Sheehan, senior director of the U.S. Sierra Club’s energy campaigns, said the draft policy was just a small step toward meeting the commission’s legal requirements to protect the environment and guard against climate change.
“The fossil fuel industry and the politicians they finance are pitching a fit because they’re worried FERC’s modest proposed policy changes might mean they no longer have free rein to build as many polluting pipelines as they want, with no regard for the impacts on communities or the climate,” Sheehan said.
The commission’s approval of three fracked gas pipelines Thursday “makes it painfully clear that FERC has not changed course,” Sheehan added.
Former FERC Chairman Neil Chatterjee, a Republican who supported a compromise proposal on climate change last year, decried the panel’s actions. “Today’s result exposes that FERC is now a political body more than a quasi-judicial one,” he tweeted. “Should more emphasis be placed on ‘lobbying’ commissioners than focusing on arguments in (court) pleadings?”
Chatterjee, a former McConnell aide who was elevated to the FERC chair, then later demoted by Donald Trump, called the panel’s decision to delay the climate rule “a big-time win” for pipeline companies, adding that any company considering a natural gas project “should expedite and move forward ASAP before the commission finalizes the statements.”
This Associated Press report was republished by The Canadian Press on March 24, 2022.
