The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

Trans Mountain’s Fee Plan for Fossil Customers Represents $2-Billion Taxpayer Subsidy

February 11, 2019
Reading time: 2 minutes

Logga Wiggler/Pixabay

Logga Wiggler/Pixabay

Canadian taxpayers will be on the hook for another $2-billion fossil fuel subsidy if the National Energy Board accepts the latest request from the federal Crown corporation that now operates the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, economist Robyn Allan reports in a National Observer exposé.

“If the NEB approves the toll application Trans Mountain has filed with it, it will shift the burden for the roughly $3 billion Ottawa paid to buy the regulated assets onto Canadians, rather than into tolls charged to shippers where the recovery of these costs belongs,” Allan writes. She discovered that “unacceptable burden” after reviewing Trans Mountain’s January 4 application for toll rates between 2019 and 2021.

“Pipeline companies make money by charging tolls to fossil fuel companies that ship oil and gas on their pipelines,” Allan explains. “Trans Mountain entered into private discussions with its shippers last fall to determine the tolls that would be charged from 2019 to 2021 since its most recent three-year settlement expired December 31, 2018. The outcome of those discussions resulted in favourable terms for the oil industry borne on the backs of hard-working Canadians.”

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

Observer previously reported that taxpayers’ purchase of the Trans Mountain pipeline from Houston-based Kinder Morgan Ltd. could cost more in interest charges than the highly-touted revenue the government will take away from existing pipeline operations, Allan notes. Then the Parliamentary Budget Office concluded that Ottawa may have paid Kinder Morgan $1 billion more for the pipeline than it was worth.

Thanks to the buyout, “if Trans Mountain’s shippers don’t pay for the purchase of the legacy line in tolls charged to them, then Canadian taxpayers will,” she writes. “If the NEB approves the sweetheart deal, not only will Trans Mountain continue to operate at a huge loss, none of the principal on its debt to purchase the assets will be recovered.”

Allan calculates that the toll agreement would bring Trans Mountain only $68 million per year, compared to actual annual costs of $741 million—a far cry from the government’s original promise to taxpayers that the “investment represents a fair price for Canadians” with a “real return on investment.”

The deal between federally-owned Trans Mountain and its shippers was negotiated behind closed doors, but the National Energy Board does have the authority to approve or reject the proposal, go back to Trans Mountain with questions, or hold a hearing, Allan notes. The right course of action, she adds, is for the NEB to “tell Trans Mountain to go back and negotiate a toll agreement with shippers that reflects the terms Finance Minister Bill Morneau promised Canadians—terms that deliver on the promise that buying an aging pipeline was a good deal.”

For his part, Morneau “has the authority and responsibility to protect the treasury and Canadian taxpayers,” she adds. “He could ensure that his officials take steps to direct Trans Mountain to withdraw its industry-biased application because it ignores the Finance Minister’s clear direction that Trans Mountain be managed on commercial terms.”







in Canada, Carbon Pricing, Community Climate Finance, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trending Stories

(Mark Carney/Facebook)
Energy Efficiency

Carney Promises Heat Pump Rebate Program By Early 2027

October 9, 2026
1.8k
Orin Zebest/flickr
Subsidies

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories/flickr
Nuclear

RIP SMRs: Is It the End of the Line for Small Modular Nuclear Reactors?

September 23, 2026
8.9k

Comments 7

  1. Kika Thorne says:
    8 years ago

    Any future energy subsidy from the Canadian taxpayer has to build alternative energy infrastructure. On an epic note, this change of direction could assist the millions of species at risk of extinction. On a minor note, alternative energy infrastructure construction may be just what the Albertan economy requires.

    Reply
  2. Frank Waltham says:
    8 years ago

    The oil market moves too quickly for the Canadian government to make dynamic decisions. In other words, bureaucrats are out of their league in the fast moving oil market. We could not predict that the US would be a major exporter, when only a few years ago, they were not able to export. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-oil-europe-usa-analysis/with-iran-squeezed-out-u-s-oil-takes-on-new-rivals-in-europe-idUSKCN1Q019W

    Reply
  3. robert dingle says:
    8 years ago

    More free rides for oil and gas??
    The sun is setting folks, for the industry and the Liberals!

    Reply
  4. Brian Wood says:
    8 years ago

    I have heard ecomonist Robyn Allan analyse this Tar Sands fiasco many years ago, and I find it hard to believe that our current government is still getting us deeper and deeper into Harper’s original unbelievable legacy. When will this tax payer subsidized madness stop.

    Reply
  5. David Wright says:
    8 years ago

    I guess Trans Mountain figured they got such a sucker deal with the sale of the pipeline at 25% over market value, that they might as well go back to the well again and see if we can be suckered on another deal. These guys clearly aren’t stupid … just greedy.

    Reply
  6. George Assaf says:
    8 years ago

    That money could buy and install a lot of solar panels. How many people would switch to electric vehicles if they could buy them for the same price as a gas powered one?

    Our governments all need to stop subsidizing a dying industry, and put people to work on clean energy solutions.

    Reply
  7. DW says:
    8 years ago

    Let’s look at this realistically. The toll rates discussed in the article are for the existing pipeline as the expansion has yet to be built. The earliest the expansion would be ready would be the end of 2021. The expansion will triple the capacity of the pipeline. New tolls will be negotiated prior to the expanded pipeline becoming operational. Income figures above would be at least tripled with triple the product flowing. Financial Post estimates positive cash flow in year one of 126 million.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Trans Mountain’s Fee Plan for Fossil Customers Represents $2-Billion Taxpayer Subsidy

February 11, 2019
Reading time: 2 minutes

Logga Wiggler/Pixabay

Logga Wiggler/Pixabay

Canadian taxpayers will be on the hook for another $2-billion fossil fuel subsidy if the National Energy Board accepts the latest request from the federal Crown corporation that now operates the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, economist Robyn Allan reports in a National Observer exposé.

“If the NEB approves the toll application Trans Mountain has filed with it, it will shift the burden for the roughly $3 billion Ottawa paid to buy the regulated assets onto Canadians, rather than into tolls charged to shippers where the recovery of these costs belongs,” Allan writes. She discovered that “unacceptable burden” after reviewing Trans Mountain’s January 4 application for toll rates between 2019 and 2021.

“Pipeline companies make money by charging tolls to fossil fuel companies that ship oil and gas on their pipelines,” Allan explains. “Trans Mountain entered into private discussions with its shippers last fall to determine the tolls that would be charged from 2019 to 2021 since its most recent three-year settlement expired December 31, 2018. The outcome of those discussions resulted in favourable terms for the oil industry borne on the backs of hard-working Canadians.”

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

Observer previously reported that taxpayers’ purchase of the Trans Mountain pipeline from Houston-based Kinder Morgan Ltd. could cost more in interest charges than the highly-touted revenue the government will take away from existing pipeline operations, Allan notes. Then the Parliamentary Budget Office concluded that Ottawa may have paid Kinder Morgan $1 billion more for the pipeline than it was worth.

Thanks to the buyout, “if Trans Mountain’s shippers don’t pay for the purchase of the legacy line in tolls charged to them, then Canadian taxpayers will,” she writes. “If the NEB approves the sweetheart deal, not only will Trans Mountain continue to operate at a huge loss, none of the principal on its debt to purchase the assets will be recovered.”

Allan calculates that the toll agreement would bring Trans Mountain only $68 million per year, compared to actual annual costs of $741 million—a far cry from the government’s original promise to taxpayers that the “investment represents a fair price for Canadians” with a “real return on investment.”

The deal between federally-owned Trans Mountain and its shippers was negotiated behind closed doors, but the National Energy Board does have the authority to approve or reject the proposal, go back to Trans Mountain with questions, or hold a hearing, Allan notes. The right course of action, she adds, is for the NEB to “tell Trans Mountain to go back and negotiate a toll agreement with shippers that reflects the terms Finance Minister Bill Morneau promised Canadians—terms that deliver on the promise that buying an aging pipeline was a good deal.”

For his part, Morneau “has the authority and responsibility to protect the treasury and Canadian taxpayers,” she adds. “He could ensure that his officials take steps to direct Trans Mountain to withdraw its industry-biased application because it ignores the Finance Minister’s clear direction that Trans Mountain be managed on commercial terms.”







in Canada, Carbon Pricing, Community Climate Finance, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport

Comments 7

  1. Kika Thorne says:
    8 years ago

    Any future energy subsidy from the Canadian taxpayer has to build alternative energy infrastructure. On an epic note, this change of direction could assist the millions of species at risk of extinction. On a minor note, alternative energy infrastructure construction may be just what the Albertan economy requires.

    Reply
  2. Frank Waltham says:
    8 years ago

    The oil market moves too quickly for the Canadian government to make dynamic decisions. In other words, bureaucrats are out of their league in the fast moving oil market. We could not predict that the US would be a major exporter, when only a few years ago, they were not able to export. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-oil-europe-usa-analysis/with-iran-squeezed-out-u-s-oil-takes-on-new-rivals-in-europe-idUSKCN1Q019W

    Reply
  3. robert dingle says:
    8 years ago

    More free rides for oil and gas??
    The sun is setting folks, for the industry and the Liberals!

    Reply
  4. Brian Wood says:
    8 years ago

    I have heard ecomonist Robyn Allan analyse this Tar Sands fiasco many years ago, and I find it hard to believe that our current government is still getting us deeper and deeper into Harper’s original unbelievable legacy. When will this tax payer subsidized madness stop.

    Reply
  5. David Wright says:
    8 years ago

    I guess Trans Mountain figured they got such a sucker deal with the sale of the pipeline at 25% over market value, that they might as well go back to the well again and see if we can be suckered on another deal. These guys clearly aren’t stupid … just greedy.

    Reply
  6. George Assaf says:
    8 years ago

    That money could buy and install a lot of solar panels. How many people would switch to electric vehicles if they could buy them for the same price as a gas powered one?

    Our governments all need to stop subsidizing a dying industry, and put people to work on clean energy solutions.

    Reply
  7. DW says:
    8 years ago

    Let’s look at this realistically. The toll rates discussed in the article are for the existing pipeline as the expansion has yet to be built. The earliest the expansion would be ready would be the end of 2021. The expansion will triple the capacity of the pipeline. New tolls will be negotiated prior to the expanded pipeline becoming operational. Income figures above would be at least tripled with triple the product flowing. Financial Post estimates positive cash flow in year one of 126 million.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

(Mark Carney/Facebook)

Carney Promises Heat Pump Rebate Program By Early 2027

October 9, 2026
1.8k
Orin Zebest/flickr

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories/flickr

RIP SMRs: Is It the End of the Line for Small Modular Nuclear Reactors?

September 23, 2026
8.9k

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.