The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

Three Big Pipeliners Responsible for One U.S. Spill Per Week Since 2010

August 6, 2017
Reading time: 2 minutes

FEMA/Wikimedia Commons

FEMA/Wikimedia Commons

The three major pipeline companies now pushing to complete new infrastructure in Canada have collectively been responsible for one significant spill per week in the United States since 2010, according to a report and interactive map released last week by Greenpeace.

“Analysis of public data shows that the three companies proposing to build four tar sands pipelines—TransCanada, Kinder Morgan, Enbridge, and their subsidiaries—have seen 373 hazardous liquid spills from their U.S. pipeline networks from 2010 to present,” the organization reports. “Assuming these rates, the Keystone XL pipeline could expect 59 significant spills over a 50-year lifetime. Similarly, the Line 3 Expansion could see 51 significant spills over a 50-year lifetime.”

The study was based on data from the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. It showed that the three companies’ pipelines have released 63,221 barrels of hazardous material over the last seven years, including 20,082 barrels of diluted bitumen that Enbridge spilled into the Kalamazoo River in 2010. The U.S. Center for Biological Diversity published a similar analysis of PHMSA data in 2014.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“Despite industry claims to the contrary, history shows that there is simply no safe way to transport fossil fuels, and pipelines are no exception,” writes Greenpeace content producers Ryan Schleeter.

In fact, “the rate and volume of pipeline spills in the United States has increased in recent years, with devastating consequences for communities and our environment. In the past decade, U.S. pipeline spills have led to 20 fatalities, 35 injuries, US$2.6 billion in costs, and more than 34 million gallons spilled. That’s an average of 9,000 gallons of hazardous liquids spilled every single day for ten years.”

“That track record is very worrying and should send alarm bells out to every single community along the pipeline routes,” added Edmonton-based Greenpeace Canada campaigner Mike Hudema.

The Canadian Energy Pipeline Association said its members reported 46 pipeline spills in 2016, only one of them “significant”. The National Energy Board tracked 1.5 incidents per 1,000 kilometres of pipeline. NEB spokesperson Darin Barter noted the Greenpeace study “is solely focused on incidents in the United States, which the National Energy Board cannot verify.”

But the Greenpeace study “also highlights the absence of comprehensive, accessible, and easy-to-understand data on pipeline spills in Canada,” the National Observer reports.

“In Canada, pipeline databases really leave a lot to be desired,” Hudema said, with each province taking responsibility for its own data. “It would be great to have a standardized federal database,” he told the Observer. “It’s important to have just an overall snapshot of, where is Canada’s pipeline safety?”







in Canada, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport, United States

Trending Stories

Orin Zebest/flickr
Subsidies

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Mark Seery/Augtera
Data Centres & Tech

Tech Giants Face AI Bubble as Investment Nears Dot-Com Levels, Famed Investor Warns

October 2, 2026
702
Loozrboy/flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Carney Designates ‘Pacific Link’ Pipeline as Project of National Interest

October 1, 2026
1.1k

Comments 2

  1. John Hunter says:
    9 years ago

    No link to the purported report – not one detail of the claimed deaths as to whether they were gas or propane or what. No definition of “significant”. I sure would not rely on this thin gruel. How do they define a “pipeline spill”?

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      9 years ago

      Actually, the link to the source material is on the page — go to the top of the story and click on ‘Greenpeace USA’. That’s standard format for anything we publish on The Mix, since a big part of our purpose is to point readers to more detailed source material they might otherwise miss.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Three Big Pipeliners Responsible for One U.S. Spill Per Week Since 2010

August 6, 2017
Reading time: 2 minutes

FEMA/Wikimedia Commons

FEMA/Wikimedia Commons

The three major pipeline companies now pushing to complete new infrastructure in Canada have collectively been responsible for one significant spill per week in the United States since 2010, according to a report and interactive map released last week by Greenpeace.

“Analysis of public data shows that the three companies proposing to build four tar sands pipelines—TransCanada, Kinder Morgan, Enbridge, and their subsidiaries—have seen 373 hazardous liquid spills from their U.S. pipeline networks from 2010 to present,” the organization reports. “Assuming these rates, the Keystone XL pipeline could expect 59 significant spills over a 50-year lifetime. Similarly, the Line 3 Expansion could see 51 significant spills over a 50-year lifetime.”

The study was based on data from the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. It showed that the three companies’ pipelines have released 63,221 barrels of hazardous material over the last seven years, including 20,082 barrels of diluted bitumen that Enbridge spilled into the Kalamazoo River in 2010. The U.S. Center for Biological Diversity published a similar analysis of PHMSA data in 2014.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“Despite industry claims to the contrary, history shows that there is simply no safe way to transport fossil fuels, and pipelines are no exception,” writes Greenpeace content producers Ryan Schleeter.

In fact, “the rate and volume of pipeline spills in the United States has increased in recent years, with devastating consequences for communities and our environment. In the past decade, U.S. pipeline spills have led to 20 fatalities, 35 injuries, US$2.6 billion in costs, and more than 34 million gallons spilled. That’s an average of 9,000 gallons of hazardous liquids spilled every single day for ten years.”

“That track record is very worrying and should send alarm bells out to every single community along the pipeline routes,” added Edmonton-based Greenpeace Canada campaigner Mike Hudema.

The Canadian Energy Pipeline Association said its members reported 46 pipeline spills in 2016, only one of them “significant”. The National Energy Board tracked 1.5 incidents per 1,000 kilometres of pipeline. NEB spokesperson Darin Barter noted the Greenpeace study “is solely focused on incidents in the United States, which the National Energy Board cannot verify.”

But the Greenpeace study “also highlights the absence of comprehensive, accessible, and easy-to-understand data on pipeline spills in Canada,” the National Observer reports.

“In Canada, pipeline databases really leave a lot to be desired,” Hudema said, with each province taking responsibility for its own data. “It would be great to have a standardized federal database,” he told the Observer. “It’s important to have just an overall snapshot of, where is Canada’s pipeline safety?”







in Canada, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport, United States

Comments 2

  1. John Hunter says:
    9 years ago

    No link to the purported report – not one detail of the claimed deaths as to whether they were gas or propane or what. No definition of “significant”. I sure would not rely on this thin gruel. How do they define a “pipeline spill”?

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      9 years ago

      Actually, the link to the source material is on the page — go to the top of the story and click on ‘Greenpeace USA’. That’s standard format for anything we publish on The Mix, since a big part of our purpose is to point readers to more detailed source material they might otherwise miss.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Orin Zebest/flickr

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Mark Seery/Augtera

Tech Giants Face AI Bubble as Investment Nears Dot-Com Levels, Famed Investor Warns

October 2, 2026
702
Loozrboy/flickr

Carney Designates ‘Pacific Link’ Pipeline as Project of National Interest

October 1, 2026
1.1k

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.