• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
Low Funding, Fewer Deep Retrofits Limit Gains from Canada Greener Homes Program November 30, 2023
Toronto Lands Transit Funding as Ottawa Council ‘Ties Hands’ with Budget Deficits November 29, 2023
Yukon Falls Short on Renewables as Climate Council Maps Decarbonization Path November 29, 2023
Water Profits, Shortages Imperil Communities Near Two Mighty Rivers November 29, 2023
Squamish Council Supports Lawsuit Against Big Oil November 29, 2023
Next
Prev

Rich countries’ climate plans leave yawning gap

June 7, 2015
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Alex Kirby

Analysis of emissions cuts planned by EU and G7 countries reveals that they will take the world less than a third of the way to the agreed safety level. LONDON, 8 June, 2015 − Some of the world’s richest countries are not preparing to do anything like enough to limit their greenhouse gas emissions, according to new analysis. The report by Climate Action Tracker (CAT) says that all the G7 countries and the member states of the European Union have so far agreed is to keep their emissions at around their present levels for the next 15 years, instead of cutting them fast. The combined climate plans for the G7 and the EU mark “a small step towards the right track to hold warming to 2˚C, but they still leave a substantial emissions gap”, according to analysts from CAT, which reports on countries’ emissions commitments and performance. The gap yawns so wide that the present level of commitment shown by the two blocs would go less than one-third of the way to staying within the 2˚C limit, they find.

Extreme risk

And they say there is “an extreme risk” that this low level of ambition could continue until 2030 to keep emissions so high that it would be impossible to stay within the 2°C warming limit, agreed by the world’s governments. The concern is based on what climate negotiators call the blocs’ Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), undertakings given by governments about what each of them will do to implement the global agreement on tackling climate change that they hope to reach at the UN climate change conference in Paris later this year. With the G7 countries meeting in Germany yesterday and today, CAT − a consortium of four research organisations − has looked at the combined INDCs of all G7 governments and the EU, who account together for around 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions and 40% of global GDP.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“This gap shows us that it’s very clear the G7 and EU need to urgently revise their current policies”

The current G7+EU policies, CAT says, are projected only to stabilise emissions through to 2030 at close to present levels, despite the need for there to be a rapid decline in emissions. The combined effect of the G7+EU INDCs for 2025 and 2030 would bring the group to no more than 20%-30% of the reductions needed to stay with the 2°C limit, or the more stringent 1.5°C threshold for which many climate scientists are pressing. The authors say the G7 and EU governments must significantly improve on the INDCs they have submitted so far before the Paris talks start on 30 November. They also urge that the INDC commitments should be limited in time − for example, to the five years from 2021 to 2025 − to avoid locking in emissions levels that are inconsistent with the 2°C and 1.5°C thresholds.

Major steps

“This gap shows us that it’s very clear the G7 and EU need to urgently revise their current policies,” says Bill Hare, of Climate Analytics, one of the consortium members. “They need to review – and increase – their stated climate plans before Paris, so that the Paris Agreement can make major steps towards setting the world on a below-2˚C pathway, “The G7+EU INDCs on the table now show there is an extreme risk of locking in, until 2030, high emissions levels that are inconsistent with holding warming below 2˚C and to 1.5°C. Waiting 15 years from today to increase emissions reductions − and 10 years after the 2020 agreement comes into force − could be very dangerous for the planet.” The authors say the EU’s policies would bring it close to achieving its INDC in 2030, but the US, Canada and Japan still have a lot of work to do. They call Canada’s INDC and Japan’s draft INDC “inadequate”. − Climate News Network



in Climate News Network

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Ben Wall/Wikimedia Commons
Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise

Most Glaciers Would Be Lost at 2.0°C, Scientists Warn

November 20, 2023
66
moerschy / Pixabay
Biodiversity & Habitat

Planetary Weight Study Shows Humans Taking Most of Earth’s Resources

March 19, 2023
56
U.S. Geological Survey/wikimedia commons
Biodiversity & Habitat

Climate Change Amplifies Risk of ‘Insect Apocalypse’

December 1, 2022
70

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Pxfuel

Coal Giants Teck, Glencore Plan Exit as Trade Group Pitches Ludicrous Clean Rebrand

November 28, 2023
446
Untrakdrover/Wikimedia Commons

Portugal Runs All-Renewable Grid for 6 Days Straight

November 23, 2023
1k
Junktuner/wikimedia commons

UAE Briefing Targets Canada for LNG Deals During COP28 Climate Discussions

November 28, 2023
322
McDonald's/flickr

McDonald’s Failing to Follow Through on Climate Promises, Critics Say

December 17, 2021
4k
Unsplash/Pixabay

‘LIKE THE TITANIC’: Climate Risk Estimates Shipwrecked by Neglect of Science

November 28, 2023
174
2happy/StockVault

Alberta Fossils Undercount Methane by 50% as Ottawa Touts New Rules

November 28, 2023
111

Recent Posts

energy efficient home retrofit

Low Funding, Fewer Deep Retrofits Limit Gains from Canada Greener Homes Program

November 30, 2023
1
TheTrolleyPole/wikimedia commons

Toronto Lands Transit Funding as Ottawa Council ‘Ties Hands’ with Budget Deficits

November 29, 2023
1
WayNorth Enterprises/Twitter

Yukon Falls Short on Renewables as Climate Council Maps Decarbonization Path

November 29, 2023
1
Oak Ridge National Laboratory/wikimedia commons

North America’s First Wireless-Charging Roadway to ‘Unlock EV Adoption’

November 29, 2023
1
Brent Moore/flickr

Storm-Resistant Housing Gains Foothold in U.S. Hurricane Zones

November 29, 2023
1
NASA/flickr

Dried Up ‘River Highway’ Spells Trouble for Mackenzie Valley Communities

November 29, 2023
1
Next Post
Marek Slusarczyk /Wikimedia Commons

Tim Hortons Faces Petition, Counter-Boycott Over Pipeline Promo

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
Climate & Capital PrimaryLogo_FullColor
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2023 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

We’re glad you’re here!

But with web platforms blocking Canadian news, you may not always be able to find us. Subscribe today and never miss another story from The Energy Mix.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

Learn more about news throttling and Bill C-18

We’re glad you’re here!

But with web platforms blocking Canadian news, you may not always be able to find us. Subscribe today and never miss another story from The Energy Mix.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

Learn more about news throttling and Bill C-18

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need