• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
Emissions Still Rising, ‘Carbon Bombs’ Risk Another 86B Tonnes, as COP28 Talks Flooded by Fossil Lobbyists December 5, 2023
World Races Toward ‘Disastrous’ Climate Tipping Points, as Positive Change Also Accelerates December 5, 2023
COP Global Stocktake Will ‘Make or Break 1.5°C’, Advocates Warn, as Negotiations Bog Down December 5, 2023
Fossil Fuel Phaseout Must Only Be Done Fairly: Athanasiou December 5, 2023
Fossil Phaseout Urgent, 1.5°C Overshoot Inevitable, Scientists Tell COP28 Negotiators December 4, 2023
Next
Prev

Ottawa Won’t Fight West Moberly Injunction Request on Site C Hydro Project

May 15, 2018
Reading time: 2 minutes

Robin/Flickr

Robin/Flickr

The federal government has decided not to oppose a First Nations bid for an injunction to delay the C$10.7-billion Site C hydro development in British Columbia, and some of the resulting news coverage is suggesting a connection to another massively controversial megaproject on which Ottawa and B.C. are not on the same side.

The federal government approved Site C in 2014, and is now a co-defendant in an application by the West Moberly First Nations to “halt construction on the province’s most costly civil works project in history,” the Globe and Mail reports. “The surprise decision by the federal justice department to sit on the sidelines was made just as Ottawa prepares to unveil its plans to fight [B.C. Premier John] Horgan’s government’s bid to stall construction of a different energy megaproject—the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

While the timing may be a coincidence, the Globe states, “there is frustration in Ottawa that Mr. Horgan has followed through on his election commitment to stop the pipeline project by taking a reference case to the courts, seeking the authority to limit the transport of heavy oil.”

The West Moberly application is set to be heard this July, and BC Hydro has already acknowledged a $610-million expense after missing a deadline to divert the Peace River. The communities’ civil suit argues that the dam violates its treaty rights, and seeks an injunction until its claim can be resolved—a process that would take a year or more. That delay would lead to major cost overruns and thousands of layoffs.

Until now, the West Moberly First Nations “have faced three opponents in court in their multiple attempts to stop the Site C dam—British Columbia, its Crown corporation BC Hydro, and Canada,” the Globe notes. “Their lawyers were stunned when the federal justice department filed its response to the injunction application in B.C. Supreme Court. ‘Canada does not oppose’ and ‘takes no position’ on the application, the court documents state.”

That was Chief Roland Willson’s cue to urge B.C. to follow suit.

“It feels kind of odd and makes me wonder what they’re up to,” he told The Canadian Press.

But even so, “the Premier can meet with us and our federal counterparts to work out how best to wind down work on Site C until the question of Treaty infringement is finally decided,” Willson said in a statement. “Canada has laid down its weapons. Now, it’s time for B.C. to disarm. Let’s put the lawyers away and try diplomacy.”

Caroline Theriault, spokesperson for Environment and Climate Minister Catherine McKenna, said Canada will still defend federal approval of the project, even though it was based on an environmental assessment that McKenna has said is fundamentally flawed, CP reports. “The federal environmental assessment process for the Site C project has already been upheld in other court actions,” Theriault said.



in Canada, Community Climate Finance, First Peoples, Hydropower, Jobs & Training, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Tony Webster/Flickr
COP Conferences

World Races Toward ‘Disastrous’ Climate Tipping Points, as Positive Change Also Accelerates

December 5, 2023
130
Kiara Worth UNFCCC/flickr
Environmental Justice

Fossil Fuel Phaseout Must Only Be Done Fairly: Athanasiou

December 5, 2023
45
Jan Arne Wold/Equinor
Legal & Regulatory

‘Really Wise Decision’ as Ottawa, Nova Scotia Turn Down Offshore Oil Proposal

December 5, 2023
75

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

SalFalko/flickr

Canada Pension Plan ‘Flunks the Test’ by Cheerleading Alberta Fossils: DeRochie

December 4, 2023
1k
bhumann34 / Pixabay

Emissions Still Rising, ‘Carbon Bombs’ Risk Another 86B Tonnes, as COP28 Talks Flooded by Fossil Lobbyists

December 5, 2023
228
Tony Webster/Flickr

World Races Toward ‘Disastrous’ Climate Tipping Points, as Positive Change Also Accelerates

December 5, 2023
130
Environment and Climate Change Canada/Facebook

Canada to Mandate 75% Cut in Fossil Industry Methane by 2030

December 5, 2023
505
Mariordo/wikimedia commons

Solid-State Battery Breakthrough Could Double EV Range

November 30, 2023
1.1k
Green Energy Futures/flickr

Canada Plans Mandatory Energy Audits Before All Home Sales

March 4, 2022
1.2k

Recent Posts

Kiara Worth UNFCCC/flickr

COP Global Stocktake Will ‘Make or Break 1.5°C’, Advocates Warn, as Negotiations Bog Down

December 5, 2023
75
Kiara Worth UNFCCC/flickr

Fossil Fuel Phaseout Must Only Be Done Fairly: Athanasiou

December 5, 2023
45
Jan Arne Wold/Equinor

‘Really Wise Decision’ as Ottawa, Nova Scotia Turn Down Offshore Oil Proposal

December 5, 2023
75
skeeze / Pixabay

Fossil Phaseout Urgent, 1.5°C Overshoot Inevitable, Scientists Tell COP28 Negotiators

December 5, 2023
231
U.S. Energy Information /Pixabay

Interim Toll Allows Trans Mountain to Double Fee to Fossil Producers

December 4, 2023
99
energy efficient home retrofit

Low Funding, Fewer Deep Retrofits Limit Gains from Canada Greener Homes Program

December 4, 2023
394
Next Post
Swinsto101/Wikimedia Commons

Risk Specialist Warns of ‘Relatively High Likelihood’ of Oil Blowout at BP Offshore Drill Site

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
Climate & Capital PrimaryLogo_FullColor
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2023 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}