The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

Ottawa Began Negotiating Bailout a Month Before Kinder Morgan Ultimatum, Company Filing Shows

August 12, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

Enron Complex: Alex/wikimedia commons

Enron Complex: Alex/wikimedia commons

By the time Kinder Morgan Ltd. issued its April 8 ultimatum, demanding “certainty” on the future of its Trans Mountain pipeline expansion by May 31, then-Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr and his chief of staff, climate hawk Zoë Caron, were already more than a month into the negotiations that eventually led to the federal government buying out the controversial project.

That revelation leads off a chronology by National Observer Managing Editor and investigative ace Mike De Souza, based on a Kinder Morgan proxy for shareholders filed early last week with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“These previously secret overtures began even though the government had made it clear, during its early negotiations with the Texas multinational, that it didn’t want to buy the pipeline and oil tanker expansion project,” Observer reports, citing the Kinder Morgan proxy document. The proxy “highlights how far the federal government was willing to go to stop the company from abandoning its plans, starting with a trip to Houston early in 2018.”

As negotiations unfolded, “the company systematically rejected the government’s negotiating position, driving Ottawa to eventually agree at the end of May to buy the rights to the Trans Mountain expansion project and an existing 65-year old pipeline system for C$4.5 billion.”

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

That deal is now coming up for approval by Kinder Morgan shareholders August 30, and the company is recommending they accept it. If they do, five company executives will be entitled to cash out shares worth millions of dollars, Observer reveals.

When they first travelled to Houston March 6, Carr and Caron “offered a ‘resolution’ to concerns that the company and its shareholders were about to lose billions of dollars if they continued spending money on the project without guarantees they could complete or even operate it under tough provincial regulations,” De Souza writes. “At that point, the company had already spent about $1.1 billion on the expansion, and was expecting to lose all of that money until the government came through with its $4.5 billion offer to purchase the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, some related assets, and the rights to build the expansion.”

On top of the $4.5 billion, Kinder Morgan’s estimate of the cost of completing the project has skyrocketed from $4.1 billion when the federal cabinet approved it in November 2016, to $7.4 billion when Ottawa announced the buyout, to $9.3 billion in the latest filing.

“It appears as though (the federal government) deliberately withheld information about the costs, because it would have shocked Canadians at the time,” economist and longtime project critic Robyn Allan told Observer. “If they didn’t know, they should have known.”

At that March 6 meeting, “company officials told Carr and Caron that they wanted the federal government to show more ‘support’” for construction of the pipeline, De Souza writes. The proxy indicates the company demanded “legislation that would provide a ‘once and for all’ approval of the federally-approved undertakings, rendering B.C.’s initiatives to stop the project ineffective.” It noted the potentially “disastrous” risks Kinder Morgan faced due to British Columbia’s constitutional and jurisdictional challenge to the project. Observer notes that it made no mention of the additional issues raised in separate court challenges by First Nations.

But “despite all of these legal and regulatory obstacles, federal government representatives continued to meet with Kinder Morgan officials over the next few weeks,” Observer recounts. The proxy documents conference calls and meetings with the federal finance department and the Prime Minister’s Office between March 21 and 27, with officials saying Canada could “potentially step into ownership” of the project to get the pipeline built.

When the April 8 ultimatum hit, “I knew there was a reasonable chance that they would pull out and at the same time there was a possibility Canada would step in,” Carr told The Canadian Press in June. Canada proposed a partial buyout April 10, Kinder Morgan suggested April 13 that the parties “focus on a 100% sale scenario”, and Trudeau instructed Finance Minister Bill Morneau to initiate formal negotiations April 15. De Souza recounts the chronology leading up to May 29, the day Morneau told Canadians we’d all become involuntary owners of the pipeline Kinder Morgan knew better than to build.







in Canada, Community Climate Finance, Energy Politics, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trending Stories

Orin Zebest/flickr
Subsidies

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Mark Seery/Augtera
Data Centres & Tech

Tech Giants Face AI Bubble as Investment Nears Dot-Com Levels, Famed Investor Warns

October 2, 2026
712
Loozrboy/flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Carney Designates ‘Pacific Link’ Pipeline as Project of National Interest

October 1, 2026
1.1k

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Ottawa Began Negotiating Bailout a Month Before Kinder Morgan Ultimatum, Company Filing Shows

August 12, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

Enron Complex: Alex/wikimedia commons

Enron Complex: Alex/wikimedia commons

By the time Kinder Morgan Ltd. issued its April 8 ultimatum, demanding “certainty” on the future of its Trans Mountain pipeline expansion by May 31, then-Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr and his chief of staff, climate hawk Zoë Caron, were already more than a month into the negotiations that eventually led to the federal government buying out the controversial project.

That revelation leads off a chronology by National Observer Managing Editor and investigative ace Mike De Souza, based on a Kinder Morgan proxy for shareholders filed early last week with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“These previously secret overtures began even though the government had made it clear, during its early negotiations with the Texas multinational, that it didn’t want to buy the pipeline and oil tanker expansion project,” Observer reports, citing the Kinder Morgan proxy document. The proxy “highlights how far the federal government was willing to go to stop the company from abandoning its plans, starting with a trip to Houston early in 2018.”

As negotiations unfolded, “the company systematically rejected the government’s negotiating position, driving Ottawa to eventually agree at the end of May to buy the rights to the Trans Mountain expansion project and an existing 65-year old pipeline system for C$4.5 billion.”

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

That deal is now coming up for approval by Kinder Morgan shareholders August 30, and the company is recommending they accept it. If they do, five company executives will be entitled to cash out shares worth millions of dollars, Observer reveals.

When they first travelled to Houston March 6, Carr and Caron “offered a ‘resolution’ to concerns that the company and its shareholders were about to lose billions of dollars if they continued spending money on the project without guarantees they could complete or even operate it under tough provincial regulations,” De Souza writes. “At that point, the company had already spent about $1.1 billion on the expansion, and was expecting to lose all of that money until the government came through with its $4.5 billion offer to purchase the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, some related assets, and the rights to build the expansion.”

On top of the $4.5 billion, Kinder Morgan’s estimate of the cost of completing the project has skyrocketed from $4.1 billion when the federal cabinet approved it in November 2016, to $7.4 billion when Ottawa announced the buyout, to $9.3 billion in the latest filing.

“It appears as though (the federal government) deliberately withheld information about the costs, because it would have shocked Canadians at the time,” economist and longtime project critic Robyn Allan told Observer. “If they didn’t know, they should have known.”

At that March 6 meeting, “company officials told Carr and Caron that they wanted the federal government to show more ‘support’” for construction of the pipeline, De Souza writes. The proxy indicates the company demanded “legislation that would provide a ‘once and for all’ approval of the federally-approved undertakings, rendering B.C.’s initiatives to stop the project ineffective.” It noted the potentially “disastrous” risks Kinder Morgan faced due to British Columbia’s constitutional and jurisdictional challenge to the project. Observer notes that it made no mention of the additional issues raised in separate court challenges by First Nations.

But “despite all of these legal and regulatory obstacles, federal government representatives continued to meet with Kinder Morgan officials over the next few weeks,” Observer recounts. The proxy documents conference calls and meetings with the federal finance department and the Prime Minister’s Office between March 21 and 27, with officials saying Canada could “potentially step into ownership” of the project to get the pipeline built.

When the April 8 ultimatum hit, “I knew there was a reasonable chance that they would pull out and at the same time there was a possibility Canada would step in,” Carr told The Canadian Press in June. Canada proposed a partial buyout April 10, Kinder Morgan suggested April 13 that the parties “focus on a 100% sale scenario”, and Trudeau instructed Finance Minister Bill Morneau to initiate formal negotiations April 15. De Souza recounts the chronology leading up to May 29, the day Morneau told Canadians we’d all become involuntary owners of the pipeline Kinder Morgan knew better than to build.







in Canada, Community Climate Finance, Energy Politics, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Orin Zebest/flickr

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Mark Seery/Augtera

Tech Giants Face AI Bubble as Investment Nears Dot-Com Levels, Famed Investor Warns

October 2, 2026
712
Loozrboy/flickr

Carney Designates ‘Pacific Link’ Pipeline as Project of National Interest

October 1, 2026
1.1k

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.