The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

No GNL Québec Pipeline on Ancestral Lands, Innu Say

July 18, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press @CdnPressNews
Author: Virginie Ann @LaVirginieAnn

Ian Schofield/Wikimedia Commons

Ian Schofield/Wikimedia Commons

There won’t be any more negotiations over a proposed natural gas pipeline crossing Indigenous lands in northern Quebec, say Innu leaders who oppose it.

The Innu First Nations of Mashteuiatsh, Pessamit, and Essipit say they are ready to take measures—up to and including legal action—to stop GNL Québec’s Énergie Saguenay project from being built on their territories, The Canadian Press reports.

The statement released on Friday was a response to comments from GNL Québec president Tony Le Verger, who said last weekend he wanted to continue negotiations with the Indigenous communities.

But Charles-Edouard Verreault, vice-chief of Mashteuiatsh First Nation and spokesperson for the three Innu nations, told CP Friday that GNL Québec won’t receive their consent.

The Innu had previously expressed opposition to the multi-billion-dollar plan in May, following the publication of an environmental review by Quebec’s Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (BAPE).

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“We listened, we did our own research on the project, and following the conclusions of the BAPE report, it is clear that our position will remain the same,” Verreault said. “This project won’t be happening on our territories.”

The 500-page BAPE report said the risks from the 750-kilometre-long gas pipeline would “far outweigh” the benefits, CP reported at the time. The project drew the widest response ever to a BAPE review with more than 2,500 briefs presented, 91% of them opposing the development.

“As mentioned in the report, GNL Québec has no way of ensuring that liquefied natural gas would effectively serve as a substitute to polluting fuels already used in targeted export markets,” Verreault said. “It’s impossible for the company to meet its commitment in terms of reducing greenhouse gases.”

GNL Québec spokesperson Louis-Martin Leclerc told CP the company remains open to negotiations with the communities in order to explain the project’s benefits.

“We are and remain open to dialogue in order to have the opportunity to explain our commitments and demonstrate that the Énergie Saguenay project will provide liquefied natural gas with the lowest carbon footprint in the world, thus making an important contribution to the fight against climate change,” he said.

The Énergie Saguenay project was first introduced to the Indigenous communities in 2014 as a measure to fight climate change, Verreault said.

The proposed route would carry LNG from Western Canada to a liquefaction plant in Port Saguenay, QC. However, Verreault said the route would cross Indigenous lands.

For the Innu First Nations, accepting a project that could pose environmental threats would go against ancestral values, he added. “This territory is where our ancestors have been settled for centuries and where we hold ancestral rights and Innu titles.”

Those ancestral rights, however, have yet to be officially recognized by the Quebec government, CP says.

Quebec Indigenous Affairs Minister Ian Lafrenière said on Friday he was aware of the Innu position but was awaiting Environment Minister Benoit Charette’s decision on the project. In April, the province said it would make a decision on whether to give the project the green light by the end of the summer. And the Innu are watching closely.

“All the options are on the table, in terms of the actions we could take (to stop the project) if the government goes ahead with it,” Verreault said. “There is no way that GNL Quebec sees the light of the day on the Innu territory.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published on July 17, 2021.







in Canada, Community Climate Finance, Fossil Fuels, Fracking & LNG, Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Quebec, Regions, Subnational

Trending Stories

(Mark Carney/Facebook)
Energy Efficiency

Carney Promises Heat Pump Rebate Program By Early 2027

October 9, 2026
2.3k
CC BY-SA 3.0/wikimedia commons
Data Centres & Tech

O’Leary Data Centre Megaproject Faces Two New Applications for Judicial Reviews

October 16, 2026
624
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories/flickr
Nuclear

RIP SMRs: Is It the End of the Line for Small Modular Nuclear Reactors?

September 23, 2026
9.2k

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

No GNL Québec Pipeline on Ancestral Lands, Innu Say

July 18, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press @CdnPressNews
Author: Virginie Ann @LaVirginieAnn

Ian Schofield/Wikimedia Commons

Ian Schofield/Wikimedia Commons

There won’t be any more negotiations over a proposed natural gas pipeline crossing Indigenous lands in northern Quebec, say Innu leaders who oppose it.

The Innu First Nations of Mashteuiatsh, Pessamit, and Essipit say they are ready to take measures—up to and including legal action—to stop GNL Québec’s Énergie Saguenay project from being built on their territories, The Canadian Press reports.

The statement released on Friday was a response to comments from GNL Québec president Tony Le Verger, who said last weekend he wanted to continue negotiations with the Indigenous communities.

But Charles-Edouard Verreault, vice-chief of Mashteuiatsh First Nation and spokesperson for the three Innu nations, told CP Friday that GNL Québec won’t receive their consent.

The Innu had previously expressed opposition to the multi-billion-dollar plan in May, following the publication of an environmental review by Quebec’s Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (BAPE).

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“We listened, we did our own research on the project, and following the conclusions of the BAPE report, it is clear that our position will remain the same,” Verreault said. “This project won’t be happening on our territories.”

The 500-page BAPE report said the risks from the 750-kilometre-long gas pipeline would “far outweigh” the benefits, CP reported at the time. The project drew the widest response ever to a BAPE review with more than 2,500 briefs presented, 91% of them opposing the development.

“As mentioned in the report, GNL Québec has no way of ensuring that liquefied natural gas would effectively serve as a substitute to polluting fuels already used in targeted export markets,” Verreault said. “It’s impossible for the company to meet its commitment in terms of reducing greenhouse gases.”

GNL Québec spokesperson Louis-Martin Leclerc told CP the company remains open to negotiations with the communities in order to explain the project’s benefits.

“We are and remain open to dialogue in order to have the opportunity to explain our commitments and demonstrate that the Énergie Saguenay project will provide liquefied natural gas with the lowest carbon footprint in the world, thus making an important contribution to the fight against climate change,” he said.

The Énergie Saguenay project was first introduced to the Indigenous communities in 2014 as a measure to fight climate change, Verreault said.

The proposed route would carry LNG from Western Canada to a liquefaction plant in Port Saguenay, QC. However, Verreault said the route would cross Indigenous lands.

For the Innu First Nations, accepting a project that could pose environmental threats would go against ancestral values, he added. “This territory is where our ancestors have been settled for centuries and where we hold ancestral rights and Innu titles.”

Those ancestral rights, however, have yet to be officially recognized by the Quebec government, CP says.

Quebec Indigenous Affairs Minister Ian Lafrenière said on Friday he was aware of the Innu position but was awaiting Environment Minister Benoit Charette’s decision on the project. In April, the province said it would make a decision on whether to give the project the green light by the end of the summer. And the Innu are watching closely.

“All the options are on the table, in terms of the actions we could take (to stop the project) if the government goes ahead with it,” Verreault said. “There is no way that GNL Quebec sees the light of the day on the Innu territory.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published on July 17, 2021.







in Canada, Community Climate Finance, Fossil Fuels, Fracking & LNG, Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Quebec, Regions, Subnational

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

(Mark Carney/Facebook)

Carney Promises Heat Pump Rebate Program By Early 2027

October 9, 2026
2.3k
CC BY-SA 3.0/wikimedia commons

O’Leary Data Centre Megaproject Faces Two New Applications for Judicial Reviews

October 16, 2026
624
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories/flickr

RIP SMRs: Is It the End of the Line for Small Modular Nuclear Reactors?

September 23, 2026
9.2k

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.