The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

Lawsuit Calls for Duke Energy, Not North Carolina Ratepayers, to Fund Coal Ash Cleanup

November 11, 2020
Reading time: 2 minutes

EPA/Wikimedia Commons

EPA/Wikimedia Commons

North Carolina-based Duke Energy is pushing for permission from the state’s utility commission to impose rate increases to cover the US$9 billion it will need for coal ash cleanup. But the company will be seeing the state’s attorney general, along with local environmental groups, in supreme court.

The cleanup is the result of a January settlement agreement between Duke and the same environmental groups that had the mammoth utility promising to excavate 124 million tonnes of groundwater-polluting coal ash waste, and deal with it properly. But for this new lawsuit, the energy company is vowing to play hardball, reports Utility Dive.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“I think all parties are interested in hearing what the court and commissions have to say,” said Duke CEO Lynn Good, when asked by an analyst if the company would again be open to compromise in its quest for the rate increases. Duke is asking the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) for 6% and 15.6% hikes in its Carolinas and Progress territories, respectively.

Local environmental groups are “staunchly opposed” to any such increases, reports Utility Dive. State Attorney General Josh Stein is appealing the rate changes in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, with hopes pinned on an NCUC ruling from earlier this year that Richmond, Virginia-based Dominion Energy “could not earn a return on its coal ash cleanup investments.”

That ruling isn’t worrying the company, however. “We believe ash is a recoverable cost [and] the NCUC does as well,” Good told Utility Dive. “We also believe that we are entitled to earn a return on costs that are collected over a long period of time, consistent with the precedents of ratemaking in the state, and also consistent with the requirements of strong credit for the utility.”

The state, for its part, is arguing that the utility knew perfectly well that its coal ash was polluting groundwater, so it must be held liable for all cleanup costs. In his appeal announcement, the attorney general said Duke Energy’s failure to act prudently on a risk it well understood should not leave the citizens of North Carolina footing the bill.

“Duke’s shareholders should have to pay their fair share of the total cost.” he said.







in Coal, Energy Politics, Energy Poverty, Fossil Fuels, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Regions, Subsidies, United States

Trending Stories

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Minister of Technology and Innovation Nate Glubish introduced, at a news conference in Edmonton on December 4, 2024, the province’s new data strategy. (photography by Chris Schwarz/Government of Alberta)
Data Centres & Tech

Smith Tells Albertans to ‘Lock In’ Power Prices Before Meta Data Centre Joins Grid

September 1, 2026
42.2k
Jay Phagan/flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

West Coast Pipeline Won’t Recoup Its $43.7B Cost as Global Oil Demand Weakens

September 2, 2026
2.2k
Smoke from the Long Lake wildfires in Nova Scotia, August 24, 2025. (A Disappearing Act/flickr)
Heat & Temperature

What a Supercharged El Niño Could Mean for Canada

May 18, 2026
2.3k

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

A Stirring Call to Apathy

by Mitchell Beer
September 6, 2026

…

Follow Us

Lawsuit Calls for Duke Energy, Not North Carolina Ratepayers, to Fund Coal Ash Cleanup

November 11, 2020
Reading time: 2 minutes

EPA/Wikimedia Commons

EPA/Wikimedia Commons

North Carolina-based Duke Energy is pushing for permission from the state’s utility commission to impose rate increases to cover the US$9 billion it will need for coal ash cleanup. But the company will be seeing the state’s attorney general, along with local environmental groups, in supreme court.

The cleanup is the result of a January settlement agreement between Duke and the same environmental groups that had the mammoth utility promising to excavate 124 million tonnes of groundwater-polluting coal ash waste, and deal with it properly. But for this new lawsuit, the energy company is vowing to play hardball, reports Utility Dive.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“I think all parties are interested in hearing what the court and commissions have to say,” said Duke CEO Lynn Good, when asked by an analyst if the company would again be open to compromise in its quest for the rate increases. Duke is asking the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) for 6% and 15.6% hikes in its Carolinas and Progress territories, respectively.

Local environmental groups are “staunchly opposed” to any such increases, reports Utility Dive. State Attorney General Josh Stein is appealing the rate changes in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, with hopes pinned on an NCUC ruling from earlier this year that Richmond, Virginia-based Dominion Energy “could not earn a return on its coal ash cleanup investments.”

That ruling isn’t worrying the company, however. “We believe ash is a recoverable cost [and] the NCUC does as well,” Good told Utility Dive. “We also believe that we are entitled to earn a return on costs that are collected over a long period of time, consistent with the precedents of ratemaking in the state, and also consistent with the requirements of strong credit for the utility.”

The state, for its part, is arguing that the utility knew perfectly well that its coal ash was polluting groundwater, so it must be held liable for all cleanup costs. In his appeal announcement, the attorney general said Duke Energy’s failure to act prudently on a risk it well understood should not leave the citizens of North Carolina footing the bill.

“Duke’s shareholders should have to pay their fair share of the total cost.” he said.







in Coal, Energy Politics, Energy Poverty, Fossil Fuels, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Regions, Subsidies, United States

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Minister of Technology and Innovation Nate Glubish introduced, at a news conference in Edmonton on December 4, 2024, the province’s new data strategy. (photography by Chris Schwarz/Government of Alberta)

Smith Tells Albertans to ‘Lock In’ Power Prices Before Meta Data Centre Joins Grid

September 1, 2026
42.2k
Jay Phagan/flickr

West Coast Pipeline Won’t Recoup Its $43.7B Cost as Global Oil Demand Weakens

September 2, 2026
2.2k
Smoke from the Long Lake wildfires in Nova Scotia, August 24, 2025. (A Disappearing Act/flickr)

What a Supercharged El Niño Could Mean for Canada

May 18, 2026
2.3k

A Stirring Call to Apathy

by Mitchell Beer
September 6, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.