The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

Future of Quebec Energy Deal Unknown After Newfoundland and Labrador Election

October 20, 2025
Reading time: 4 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press
Author: Sarah Smellie

(Tony Wakeham/Facebook)

(Tony Wakeham/Facebook)

The premier of Quebec says he is committed to working with Newfoundland and Labrador following election results that have cast doubt on a tentative energy deal between the provinces.

The agreement benefits both sides, François Legault said in a social media post the morning after the results.

“Please be assured of our full commitment to continue our collaboration with Newfoundland and Labrador,” Legault wrote.

He also congratulated Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham on his Oct. 16 election victory in Newfoundland and Labrador. The Tories won a slim majority, ending 10 years of Liberal rule.

The centrepiece of the Liberal’s failed re-election campaign was the tentative agreement with Hydro-Québec, which would see the utility pay much more for power from the Churchill Falls plant in Labrador. The deal is also expected to lead to new hydroelectric projects along the Churchill River.

Wakeham has repeatedly called for the agreement to be reviewed by an independent third party, pointing to lessons from Newfoundland and Labrador’s past energy project debacles.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

During his victory speech, he vowed to have the deal reviewed and then put it to the public in a referendum.

“I will use that review to fix this deal or demand a better one,” he told supporters in western Newfoundland. “Given the generational stakes, I will not sign any deal that Newfoundlanders and Labradorians do not approve in a referendum.”

Hydro-Québec and Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro have been negotiating final, binding agreements for months, with an aim to finish in April 2026. It’s not clear how a review or a referendum in Newfoundland and Labrador would upset those plans.

Jennifer Williams, chief executive of Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro, warned earlier this year that a pause in the negotiations could send a negative message about what it’s like to do business with the province.

She congratulated Wakeham and his team in an emailed statement. “I look forward to connecting with premier-designate Wakeham in the days ahead to discuss how the crown electricity assets are integral to and contribute to the vision and plans for the province’s future,” Williams said.

Hydro-Québec also congratulated Wakeham. “We remain confident that the current agreement is fair and beneficial for both parties,” said spokesperson Lynn St-Laurent in a statement.

“Significant progress has been made in recent months toward a detailed agreement, and we remain fully committed to continuing negotiations with our partner, (Newfoundland and Labrador) Hydro.”

Political scientist Russell Williams said it is possible the memorandum of understanding may collapse in light of the election results. But that was always a possibility, said Williams, an associate professor at Memorial University. He pointed to Legault’s cratering support in Quebec, where an election is scheduled for next year.

Williams said whoever came to power in Tuesday’s election would be up against the possibility of not reaching final agreements by the time a new government is elected in Quebec—likely the Parti Québécois, according to polls. A new Quebec government may want different terms in the arrangement, he added.

“Both parties could have ended up owning a lemon in that they couldn’t get that deal over the line, at least not in a way that enjoys broad support in (Newfoundland and Labrador),” Williams said.

Ultimately, it was “nightmarishly stupid” of the Liberals not to have the draft deal evaluated by an independent expert, he said. The agreement became a source of controversy as energy watchers dug into its details and questioned whether it offered a fair return for Newfoundland and Labrador.

Earlier this year, a member of a three-person panel appointed to provide oversight of final agreement negotiations resigned from his post, citing concerns about the panel’s independence.

Williams said the uproar undermined the main plank of the Liberals’ campaign—namely, that the deal would change the game for the financially fragile province and allow the government to make big investments in health care and education and pay off debt.

“If you’re going to say this is the best deal ever and in the future, the roads are going to be paved in gold, that should be able to stand the test of some independent kicking of the tires,” he said.

The Liberals have said the deal would bring Newfoundland and Labrador roughly $225 billion over the next 50 years. The province’s net debt is expected to hit $19.7 billion next year, for a population of about 545,000 people.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2025.







in Hydropower, Newfoundland and Labrador, Policy & Politics, Quebec, Subnational

Trending Stories

Facebook
Severe Storms & Flooding

540+ Dead, Hundreds Missing as Towering Flash Flood in Nepal Points to Extreme Heat, Heavy Rainfalls

August 28, 2026
984
Sarah Yurchevich
Data Centres & Tech

Alberta Woman Maps Out the Facts About Power-Hungry Data Centres

August 25, 2026
726
picryl
Canadian Sovereignty

Trump Trade War Could Be a Catalyst to Speed Canada’s Energy Transition, Experts Say

August 25, 2026
694

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

The End of the World vs. the End of the Week: Carney’s Pushback on Trump’s Bullying Could Point to the Next Energy Transition Moment

by Mitchell Beer
August 23, 2026

…

Follow Us

Future of Quebec Energy Deal Unknown After Newfoundland and Labrador Election

October 20, 2025
Reading time: 4 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press
Author: Sarah Smellie

(Tony Wakeham/Facebook)

(Tony Wakeham/Facebook)

The premier of Quebec says he is committed to working with Newfoundland and Labrador following election results that have cast doubt on a tentative energy deal between the provinces.

The agreement benefits both sides, François Legault said in a social media post the morning after the results.

“Please be assured of our full commitment to continue our collaboration with Newfoundland and Labrador,” Legault wrote.

He also congratulated Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham on his Oct. 16 election victory in Newfoundland and Labrador. The Tories won a slim majority, ending 10 years of Liberal rule.

The centrepiece of the Liberal’s failed re-election campaign was the tentative agreement with Hydro-Québec, which would see the utility pay much more for power from the Churchill Falls plant in Labrador. The deal is also expected to lead to new hydroelectric projects along the Churchill River.

Wakeham has repeatedly called for the agreement to be reviewed by an independent third party, pointing to lessons from Newfoundland and Labrador’s past energy project debacles.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

During his victory speech, he vowed to have the deal reviewed and then put it to the public in a referendum.

“I will use that review to fix this deal or demand a better one,” he told supporters in western Newfoundland. “Given the generational stakes, I will not sign any deal that Newfoundlanders and Labradorians do not approve in a referendum.”

Hydro-Québec and Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro have been negotiating final, binding agreements for months, with an aim to finish in April 2026. It’s not clear how a review or a referendum in Newfoundland and Labrador would upset those plans.

Jennifer Williams, chief executive of Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro, warned earlier this year that a pause in the negotiations could send a negative message about what it’s like to do business with the province.

She congratulated Wakeham and his team in an emailed statement. “I look forward to connecting with premier-designate Wakeham in the days ahead to discuss how the crown electricity assets are integral to and contribute to the vision and plans for the province’s future,” Williams said.

Hydro-Québec also congratulated Wakeham. “We remain confident that the current agreement is fair and beneficial for both parties,” said spokesperson Lynn St-Laurent in a statement.

“Significant progress has been made in recent months toward a detailed agreement, and we remain fully committed to continuing negotiations with our partner, (Newfoundland and Labrador) Hydro.”

Political scientist Russell Williams said it is possible the memorandum of understanding may collapse in light of the election results. But that was always a possibility, said Williams, an associate professor at Memorial University. He pointed to Legault’s cratering support in Quebec, where an election is scheduled for next year.

Williams said whoever came to power in Tuesday’s election would be up against the possibility of not reaching final agreements by the time a new government is elected in Quebec—likely the Parti Québécois, according to polls. A new Quebec government may want different terms in the arrangement, he added.

“Both parties could have ended up owning a lemon in that they couldn’t get that deal over the line, at least not in a way that enjoys broad support in (Newfoundland and Labrador),” Williams said.

Ultimately, it was “nightmarishly stupid” of the Liberals not to have the draft deal evaluated by an independent expert, he said. The agreement became a source of controversy as energy watchers dug into its details and questioned whether it offered a fair return for Newfoundland and Labrador.

Earlier this year, a member of a three-person panel appointed to provide oversight of final agreement negotiations resigned from his post, citing concerns about the panel’s independence.

Williams said the uproar undermined the main plank of the Liberals’ campaign—namely, that the deal would change the game for the financially fragile province and allow the government to make big investments in health care and education and pay off debt.

“If you’re going to say this is the best deal ever and in the future, the roads are going to be paved in gold, that should be able to stand the test of some independent kicking of the tires,” he said.

The Liberals have said the deal would bring Newfoundland and Labrador roughly $225 billion over the next 50 years. The province’s net debt is expected to hit $19.7 billion next year, for a population of about 545,000 people.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2025.







in Hydropower, Newfoundland and Labrador, Policy & Politics, Quebec, Subnational

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Facebook

540+ Dead, Hundreds Missing as Towering Flash Flood in Nepal Points to Extreme Heat, Heavy Rainfalls

August 28, 2026
984
Sarah Yurchevich

Alberta Woman Maps Out the Facts About Power-Hungry Data Centres

August 25, 2026
726
picryl

Trump Trade War Could Be a Catalyst to Speed Canada’s Energy Transition, Experts Say

August 25, 2026
694

The End of the World vs. the End of the Week: Carney’s Pushback on Trump’s Bullying Could Point to the Next Energy Transition Moment

by Mitchell Beer
August 23, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.