The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

Cities Need Targeted Funding to Double Transit Ridership, Cut Emission by 65 Mt

March 5, 2024
Reading time: 5 minutes
Author: Gaye Taylor
Full Story: The Energy Mix

Can Pac Swire/flickr

Can Pac Swire/flickr

Canada’s plans for permanent transit funding could help double ridership on mass transit and reduce transport emission by 65 million tonnes by 2035—but only if the investment materializes, and comes with the right policies, finds a new report by Équiterre and Environmental Defence Canada.

The report urges [pdf] Ottawa to ensure that its forthcoming Permanent Public Transit Fund (PPTF) realizes its potential to deliver both climate and housing solutions by including key policies like “public transit operating funding, federal strings to encourage housing density near public transit, zero-emission bus procurement requirements, and incentives for cities to speed up public transit service with dedicated bus lanes.”

It arrives as the Canadian government inches towards creating the PPTF, a program first announced in February, 2021, which would see an annual C$3 billion being injected into public transit systems across Canada. The target date for launch is 2026, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told the Federation of Canadian Municipalities as recently as last May that a deal was just months away, the Globe and Mail reports.

But this week, mayors of 15 major cities led by Toronto’s Olivia Chow, Calgary’s Jyoti Gondek, Winnipeg’s Scott Gillingham, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities were warning that the funding might not materialize.

“We were promised infrastructure funding, and to this day, we have not heard of a plan,” FCM President Scott Pearce told media. “So as the budget comes closer and closer, we’re getting more and more concerned that there’s no plan.”

The money is urgently needed, Équiterre and Environmental Defence say. “Canada is nearly 40% below the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) average for public transit utilization (ridership per capita) in urban areas with transit service,” the report authors write.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“Public transit service levels, measured in vehicle service kilometres per person, is now 7% lower than it was in 2016, the year that the federal government introduced the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP), which included $23.5 billion in public transit investments.”

The report describes the forthcoming PPTF as an “historic opportunity” to reverse this worrying trend. It cites modelling by Dunsky Energy + Climate Advisors that shows the program, with key policies included, driving a modal shift to double transit ridership and eliminate 65 million tonnes of emissions by 2035. These outcomes should be set as clear targets, the two organizations say, along with a target to reduce vehicle kilometres travelled 35% by the same year.

Current federal policy to provide solely capital funding leaves transit systems dependent on local government funds and passenger fares to operate, creating a “chronically unstable” situation that leaves them vulnerable to market forces and the vagaries of political cycles. The failure to provide operating funds also keeps Canada’s public transit systems trapped in “vicious cycles” of cutting service, leading to further losses in passenger revenues and more cuts.

“Canada’s current public transit strategy is like a bus without wheels,” Nate Wallace, clean transportation program manager at Environmental Defence, said in a release. “Funding capital projects but not operations is not working to actually improve day-to-day service for millions of Canadians who rely on public transit.”

Stable operating revenue will give transit systems the breathing space to pursue a revenue generator that remains untapped: riders using transit for non-commuting purposes like shopping, travelling for recreation and social services, and visiting family and friends. Expanding ridership beyond 9-to-5 commuters would also “better serve the travel patterns of equity-seeking groups.”

The new report urges Ottawa to formally link public transit investments to housing outcomes. “As Canada tackles both the housing and climate crises, public policies must be pulling in the same direction,” it states. “We cannot be building dense housing near transit stations while cutting how frequently the service is running, and we cannot be building public transit infrastructure in a sea of low-density, single-detached homes.”

On that basis, the report says transit funding agreements with major cities should mandate pre-zoned housing density minimums near public transit, elimination of minimum parking requirements in new developments, and support for first and last mile connections to transit stations using sustainable travel modes like walking and biking.

To address equity concerns, the agreements must also “require anti-displacement strategies to ensure that those most likely to take public transit can actually afford to live near it.”

The report also recommends procurement requirements for zero-emission buses and rolling stock. Rather than funding one-off electrification projects, Ottawa must make “zero-emissions public transit a core feature and requirement of ongoing, permanent capital funding,” by specifying phased-in procurement protocols for zero-emission public transit vehicles as a condition for funding.

“Putting the wheels on the bus,” as the report recommends, will require total public transit service levels to increase 109% by 2035, write the authors. The increase is doable provided that the feds commit to $35.4 billion in new funding over the next 12 years, on top of the annual $3 billion promised in the forthcoming PPTF, and start funding the program in 2024 rather than 2026.

That investment “could be paid for entirely by increasing the general federal tax rate on corporate profits by a single percentage point,” the authors add. “It would comprise approximately 0.5% of total projected federal expenditures in 2024.”

The policy prescriptions in this week’s report echo the call issued by the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) last November, which warned that the planned 2026 rollout of the PPTF would leave municipalities across Canada facing an “infrastructure funding gap” and lead to “critical capacity problems and mounting state of good repair backlogs.”

CUTA said delayed delivery of the PPTF funds was particularly ill-judged given federal plans to welcome about 500,000 new Canadians per year. “By the mid-2040s, Canada will have a population of 45 to 50 million people with transit systems built for 25 million people,” CUTA said.

“Communities must be equipped to expand transit networks to meet rising demand and to ensure new housing developments are properly integrated with public transit infrastructure,” said CUTA President Marco D’Angelo. “The alternative is more road congestion, commuter dissatisfaction, and higher emissions.”







in Canada, Cities & Communities, Climate Equity & Justice, Community Climate Finance, Legal & Regulatory, Subnational, Transit, Walking, Biking & Micromobility

Trending Stories

(Mark Carney/Facebook)
Energy Efficiency

Carney Promises Heat Pump Rebate Program By Early 2027

October 9, 2026
1.5k
Orin Zebest/flickr
Subsidies

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories/flickr
Nuclear

RIP SMRs: Is It the End of the Line for Small Modular Nuclear Reactors?

September 23, 2026
8.9k

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Cities Need Targeted Funding to Double Transit Ridership, Cut Emission by 65 Mt

March 5, 2024
Reading time: 5 minutes
Author: Gaye Taylor
Full Story: The Energy Mix

Can Pac Swire/flickr

Can Pac Swire/flickr

Canada’s plans for permanent transit funding could help double ridership on mass transit and reduce transport emission by 65 million tonnes by 2035—but only if the investment materializes, and comes with the right policies, finds a new report by Équiterre and Environmental Defence Canada.

The report urges [pdf] Ottawa to ensure that its forthcoming Permanent Public Transit Fund (PPTF) realizes its potential to deliver both climate and housing solutions by including key policies like “public transit operating funding, federal strings to encourage housing density near public transit, zero-emission bus procurement requirements, and incentives for cities to speed up public transit service with dedicated bus lanes.”

It arrives as the Canadian government inches towards creating the PPTF, a program first announced in February, 2021, which would see an annual C$3 billion being injected into public transit systems across Canada. The target date for launch is 2026, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told the Federation of Canadian Municipalities as recently as last May that a deal was just months away, the Globe and Mail reports.

But this week, mayors of 15 major cities led by Toronto’s Olivia Chow, Calgary’s Jyoti Gondek, Winnipeg’s Scott Gillingham, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities were warning that the funding might not materialize.

“We were promised infrastructure funding, and to this day, we have not heard of a plan,” FCM President Scott Pearce told media. “So as the budget comes closer and closer, we’re getting more and more concerned that there’s no plan.”

The money is urgently needed, Équiterre and Environmental Defence say. “Canada is nearly 40% below the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) average for public transit utilization (ridership per capita) in urban areas with transit service,” the report authors write.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“Public transit service levels, measured in vehicle service kilometres per person, is now 7% lower than it was in 2016, the year that the federal government introduced the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP), which included $23.5 billion in public transit investments.”

The report describes the forthcoming PPTF as an “historic opportunity” to reverse this worrying trend. It cites modelling by Dunsky Energy + Climate Advisors that shows the program, with key policies included, driving a modal shift to double transit ridership and eliminate 65 million tonnes of emissions by 2035. These outcomes should be set as clear targets, the two organizations say, along with a target to reduce vehicle kilometres travelled 35% by the same year.

Current federal policy to provide solely capital funding leaves transit systems dependent on local government funds and passenger fares to operate, creating a “chronically unstable” situation that leaves them vulnerable to market forces and the vagaries of political cycles. The failure to provide operating funds also keeps Canada’s public transit systems trapped in “vicious cycles” of cutting service, leading to further losses in passenger revenues and more cuts.

“Canada’s current public transit strategy is like a bus without wheels,” Nate Wallace, clean transportation program manager at Environmental Defence, said in a release. “Funding capital projects but not operations is not working to actually improve day-to-day service for millions of Canadians who rely on public transit.”

Stable operating revenue will give transit systems the breathing space to pursue a revenue generator that remains untapped: riders using transit for non-commuting purposes like shopping, travelling for recreation and social services, and visiting family and friends. Expanding ridership beyond 9-to-5 commuters would also “better serve the travel patterns of equity-seeking groups.”

The new report urges Ottawa to formally link public transit investments to housing outcomes. “As Canada tackles both the housing and climate crises, public policies must be pulling in the same direction,” it states. “We cannot be building dense housing near transit stations while cutting how frequently the service is running, and we cannot be building public transit infrastructure in a sea of low-density, single-detached homes.”

On that basis, the report says transit funding agreements with major cities should mandate pre-zoned housing density minimums near public transit, elimination of minimum parking requirements in new developments, and support for first and last mile connections to transit stations using sustainable travel modes like walking and biking.

To address equity concerns, the agreements must also “require anti-displacement strategies to ensure that those most likely to take public transit can actually afford to live near it.”

The report also recommends procurement requirements for zero-emission buses and rolling stock. Rather than funding one-off electrification projects, Ottawa must make “zero-emissions public transit a core feature and requirement of ongoing, permanent capital funding,” by specifying phased-in procurement protocols for zero-emission public transit vehicles as a condition for funding.

“Putting the wheels on the bus,” as the report recommends, will require total public transit service levels to increase 109% by 2035, write the authors. The increase is doable provided that the feds commit to $35.4 billion in new funding over the next 12 years, on top of the annual $3 billion promised in the forthcoming PPTF, and start funding the program in 2024 rather than 2026.

That investment “could be paid for entirely by increasing the general federal tax rate on corporate profits by a single percentage point,” the authors add. “It would comprise approximately 0.5% of total projected federal expenditures in 2024.”

The policy prescriptions in this week’s report echo the call issued by the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) last November, which warned that the planned 2026 rollout of the PPTF would leave municipalities across Canada facing an “infrastructure funding gap” and lead to “critical capacity problems and mounting state of good repair backlogs.”

CUTA said delayed delivery of the PPTF funds was particularly ill-judged given federal plans to welcome about 500,000 new Canadians per year. “By the mid-2040s, Canada will have a population of 45 to 50 million people with transit systems built for 25 million people,” CUTA said.

“Communities must be equipped to expand transit networks to meet rising demand and to ensure new housing developments are properly integrated with public transit infrastructure,” said CUTA President Marco D’Angelo. “The alternative is more road congestion, commuter dissatisfaction, and higher emissions.”







in Canada, Cities & Communities, Climate Equity & Justice, Community Climate Finance, Legal & Regulatory, Subnational, Transit, Walking, Biking & Micromobility

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

(Mark Carney/Facebook)

Carney Promises Heat Pump Rebate Program By Early 2027

October 9, 2026
1.5k
Orin Zebest/flickr

$5.3B Subsidy Won’t Counter ‘Oil-Fuelled Inflation’, Critics Say, as Ottawa Extends Gas Tax Suspension

September 8, 2026
2.3k
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories/flickr

RIP SMRs: Is It the End of the Line for Small Modular Nuclear Reactors?

September 23, 2026
8.9k

A Modest Proposal for a New Project of National Interest

by Aaron Cosbey
October 4, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.