• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Lake For Years, Didn’t Tell First Nation October 3, 2023
Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution October 2, 2023
Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback October 2, 2023
Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds October 2, 2023
UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit October 2, 2023
Next
Prev

Judge Dismisses Youth Court Challenge, Scorches Ontario Climate Plan

April 19, 2023
Reading time: 4 minutes

Youth climate applicants in Mathur v. Ontario, Emily Chan/Ecojustice

Youth climate applicants in Mathur v. Ontario, Emily Chan/Ecojustice

4
SHARES
 

Applicants in a landmark youth-led climate lawsuit against the Doug Ford government are vowing to appeal their loss this week, buoyed by the judge’s rebuke of Ontario’s emissions targets and its cynical bid to skirt litigation by declaring its own climate plan to have no status in law.

Ecojustice lawyer Danielle Gallant compared Queen’s Park inadequate efforts on climate change to “bringing a glass of water to put out a house on fire,” the Toronto Star reports, even as Justice Marie-Andrée Vermette ruled that the Ford government’s 2018 Cap and Trade Cancellation Act (CTCA) did not fully violate the Charter rights of Ontario youth and Indigenous peoples. The law replaced the previous government’s emissions reduction target of 37% below 1990 with a less stringent target.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Vermette found that the province’s watered-down climate goal engaged Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms dealing with life and security of the person, but did not violate principles of fundamental justice since the target itself was not arbitrary. She did affirm the scientific consensus on the need to rapidly cut emissions, an urgency missing from the CTCA.

“While the decision was a setback, it still broke new ground in charter climate litigation in Canada—and included a damning indictment of Ontario’s weak and dangerous climate target,” Ecojustice said in a release. “The court found that the case is justiciable, which means it is an appropriate question for courts to weigh in on. This has been a significant obstacle for other Charter-based climate cases in Canada.”

The court “also found that it was ‘indisputable’ that because of climate change, Ontarians are experiencing increased risk of death and serious bodily harm and that the Government of Ontario—by enacting a target to reduce GHG emissions that falls well below what the global scientific consensus says is required—is contributing to that risk of harm,” the Vancouver-based environmental law charity added.

Launched in 2019, the youth climate lawsuit alleged that courtesy of the CTCA, Ontario will emit an additional 200 megatonnes of carbon by 2030, thereby breaking its promise to help uphold Canada’s Paris agreement commitments. The Ford government was “tearing up the province’s climate laws” and violating the youth applicants’ charter rights to life, liberty, and security of the person, the lawsuit contended. Their fight continues to be supported by lawyers from Ecojustice and Stockwoods LLP.

Vermette ruled that the Ford government had not violated the applicants’ charter rights under the charter’s equality provision, Section 15, when it reduced its emissions target. “I agree with the Applicants that the evidence in this case shows that young people are disproportionately impacted by climate change,” she wrote. “However, this disproportionate impact is caused by climate change,” not by the provincial laws.

But that’s not to say the actions of Ontario’s government do not matter, she added.

The judge rejected claims by one of the government’s expert witnesses, a well-known climate denier, that provincial efforts at emissions reductions will have no bearing on the fight to rein in global heating. She said she “rejected the notion that since climate change is ‘an inherently global problem,’ each individual province’s greenhouse gas emissions cause no ‘measurable harm’.”

Ontario’s contribution to global heating is “real, measurable and not speculative,” Vermette wrote, and its emissions contribute to climate change and the increased risks it creates. “Every tonne of carbon dioxide emissions adds to global warming and leads to a quantifiable increase in global temperatures that is essentially irreversible on human time scales.”

Vermette also rejected the province’s efforts to evade the lawsuit by declaring its own climate plan to be little more than a “glossy brochure” courtesy of its communications department, with no power to reduce emissions and therefore not subject to review by the courts.

“I am not prepared to accept that a legislative requirement, or something that is required by law to be approved by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, is meaningless,” she wrote.

Stockwoods partner Nader Hasan, one of the lawyers for the youth, argued last September that allowing a province to “insulate its actions from the Constitution by claiming they’re simply communications exercises” would set a dangerous precedent.

“If the target and plan are not reviewable, then I fear that governments’ action in this country on climate change will be immune from judicial scrutiny,” Hasan said.

The Ford government’s glossy brochure defence was “a blueprint for rendering governments immune from constitutional judicial review on some of the most important decisions that any government in this country will be making for the foreseeable future,” he added. “Fortunately, their position is not supported by law.”

“Legal challenges are becoming a powerful tool for young people to hold their governments accountable for climate action,” said Ecojustice lawyer Danielle Gallant. Despite the “disappointing” verdict, she said lawyers at Ecojustice and Stockwoods “remain inspired by the courage and determination of these young applicants to advocate for a better, safer future for us all.”

“We remain behind them to support their fight, to the Court of Appeal and beyond,” she added.



in Canada, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Climate Denial & Greenwashing, First Peoples, Health & Safety, Heat & Power, Legal & Regulatory, Ontario, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Tar Sands / Oil Sands

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Lake For Years, Didn’t Tell First Nation

October 3, 2023
1
Dawn Ellner/flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
1
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia
Finance & Investment

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
321
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
857
Solarimo/pixabay

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

October 2, 2023
211
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 28, 2023
174
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
728
McDonald's/flickr

McDonald’s Failing to Follow Through on Climate Promises, Critics Say

December 17, 2021
2.6k

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Lake For Years, Didn’t Tell First Nation

October 3, 2023
1
Dawn Ellner/flickr

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
1
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
1
Northvolt plant in Sweden, Spisen/wikimedia commons

Quebec Lands $7B Battery Gigafactory Investment from Sweden’s Northvolt

October 2, 2023
2
Arctic Circle/flickr

UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit

October 2, 2023
6
GFDL/Wikimedia Commons

Clean Energy Funding Isn’t Just About Money, Policy Expert Warns

October 2, 2023
4
Next Post
Kristoferb/Wikimedia Commons

Oxford Expert Tackles 20 Myths About Heat Pumps

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}