• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA June 4, 2023
Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest June 4, 2023
Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing June 4, 2023
2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season June 4, 2023
Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion? June 1, 2023
Next
Prev

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

34
SHARES
 

The cost of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion has mushroomed to C$30.9 billion, prompting a surprised fossil energy analyst to admit that taxpayers will have to pick up a very large tab as a result.

“The project’s new price tag is up from its previous estimate of $21.4 billion in early 2022,” CBC recalls. “A prior estimate had pegged the price at $12.6 billion.”

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

The 44% increase came as a shock to Richard Masson, an executive fellow at the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy.

“These things sometimes are unexpected, but the magnitude of this increase is very large and I don’t think anybody was expecting it,” he said, citing the atmospheric river that shut down the existing Trans Mountain pipeline in mid-November, 2021, as one factor driving up its cost.

But now, “Masson expects that the federal government will have to take a large write down on the value of its investment, adding he doesn’t believe Ottawa can recuperate all of the additional costs,” CBC writes.

“It’s going to be very costly at the end of the day for taxpayers,” he told the national broadcaster.

The latest cost figures come nearly five years after taxpayers shelled out $4.5 billion in May, 2018, after the federal government made the controversial decision to buy the pipeline. Its original owner, Houston-based Kinder Morgan, had threatened to shut down construction if it didn’t receive “clarity” on the project’s future prospects.

Fast forward to today, and Trans Mountain “is now the most expensive industrial project in Canadian history,” Dogwood B.C. wrote in its weekend newsletter. “What started as a $5.4-billion pipeline expansion has turned into a catastrophic boondoggle of immeasurable proportions—and one that will keep costing Canadian taxpayers for decades to come.”

While Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland promised early last year that there would be “no additional public money invested in TMC,” that didn’t stop Ottawa from handing the pipeline a crucial $10-billion loan guarantee three months later.

Now, “any investor checking the score can see building a pipeline is a fool’s game,” Dogwood writes. “While the average Canadian is struggling with inflation and increased interest rates, TMX is getting special treatment from our government and the banks are giving them rock bottom interest rates on their loan.”

Last June, nearly a year before the latest cost increase, Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux warned the federally-owned pipeline was already on track to lose $600 million. But he said it would cost Ottawa $14 billion to shut down the project and write off the assets.

The pipeline’s biggest financial problem, CBC explains, is that when its costs go up, it can only charge 20% of the increase back to the fossil companies that are lined up to use the pipeline.

On Friday, Trans Mountain Corporation CEO Dawn Farrell put the latest cost increase down to a commitment to quality construction.

“Canada has among the world’s highest standards for the protection of people, the environment, and Indigenous participation when building major infrastructure projects,” she said in a release. “By including these commitments into the Project design and development from the beginning, we have ensured the Project will provide economic benefits to Canadians well into the future.”

But Trans Mountain has triggered a continuing cascade complaints about permit violations, wildlife and habitat impacts, a shoddy safety record, and efforts to sidestep fire safety standards for a tank farm expansion adjacent to a major campus of Vancouver’s Simon Fraser University.



in Canada, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Finance & Investment, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

sunrise windmill
International Agencies & Studies

Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA

June 4, 2023
112
Pixabay
Solar

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
103
Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr
Cities & Communities

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 4, 2023
66

Comments 1

  1. Barbara Shaw says:
    3 months ago

    This should be front page news every day!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
14.6k
Natural Resources Canada

2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season

June 4, 2023
133
sunrise windmill

Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA

June 4, 2023
112
Pixabay

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
103
Inspiration 4 Photos/flickr

Cooling Upper Atmosphere Has Scientists ‘Very Worried’

May 23, 2023
497
Equinor

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
854

Recent Posts

Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 4, 2023
66
Clairewych/Pixabay

Demand Surges for Giant Heat Pumps as Europe Turns to District Heating

June 4, 2023
76
nicolasdebraypointcom/pixabay

Factor Gender into Transportation Planning, IISD Analyst Urges Policy-Makers

June 4, 2023
32
moerschy / Pixabay

Federal Climate Plans Must Embrace Community-Driven Resilience

June 4, 2023
44
debannja/Pixabay

Austin, Texas Council Committee Backs Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 4, 2023
74
Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
75
Next Post
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}