• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission September 28, 2023
Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds September 28, 2023
Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab September 28, 2023
Put Lower-Income Households First in Line for Low-Carbon Technologies: Samson September 28, 2023
Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update September 26, 2023
Next
Prev

CCUS Mostly Shut Out, Renewables Get Tax Credit in Federal Economic Statement

November 6, 2022
Reading time: 7 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Parliament Buildings Ottawa Centre Block

GoodFreePhotos

3
SHARES
 

A pitch for private investment in emission reduction projects, including tax credits for renewable energy, low-carbon heating, and clean hydrogen, is one of the highlights of the fall economic statement released Thursday by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland.

The statement also introduces a 2% tax on share buybacks, a well-established method of returning money to shareholders that fossil companies have visibly favoured in a moment of record profits, rather than investing in the emission reduction technologies they’ve been promising to develop. “While buying back shares is one legitimate way that corporations can return value to their shareholders, it can also divert corporate resources away from making investments in their workers and businesses in Canada,” the statement says, in a section on building a fair tax system.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

And despite several weeks of media messaging and intensive private lobbying for an increase in Ottawa’s already-lavish, C$7.1-billion federal subsidy for carbon capture, utilization, and storage, the acronym “CCUS” only shows up once in the document.

Many of the provisions in the economic statement parallel credits and incentives in the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), amid concerns that Canada would lose investment if it failed to match the momentum of its biggest trading partner. “We want to make sure that Canadian companies remain competitive and that international investors that come to our jurisdiction are able to take full advantage of the tax credits,” Associate Finance Minister Randy Boissonnault said, in the days leading up to the announcement. “Our government is very seized with this issue of the Inflation Reduction Act and how to make sure we don’t have a big gap between our two countries.”

See Saturday’s Energy Mix Weekender for an analysis of the economic statement and its implications for Canada’s energy transition.

Competing for Clean Energy Dollars

The main climate and energy commitments in the economic statement show up in a section on economic competitiveness and job creation, with a surrounding narrative that emphasizes energy efficiency, low-carbon technologies and services, green supply chains, and a half-dozen big announcements so far this year on electric vehicles, batteries, and the critical minerals they depend on. With the launch of the previously-announced Canada Growth Fund, the statement points to “trillions of dollars in private capital waiting to be spent in creating the good jobs and prosperity for workers that a net-zero economy will bring,” adding that Canada “is competing with other countries to attract the private investment we need.”

Those factors justify incentives for companies to “take risks and invest in cutting edge technology in Canada,” the statement says, plus public funding to attract the private capital the transition will need. The announcement directs the Growth Fund to unlock investments in CCUS and low-carbon hydrogen, alongside the new 30% investment tax credit for solar, wind, waterpower, electricity storage, low-carbon heat, and zero-emission vehicles for industry.

The full value of the tax credit, pegged at $6.7 billion over five years, will only be available to companies that adhere to a set of mandated labour standards—otherwise, they’ll have to settle for a 20% credit, rather than 30%. The standards require tax credit recipients to pay prevailing wages based on local market conditions and ensure training opportunities for apprentices.

The statement promises consultations on how to set up a clean hydrogen tax credit based on the life cycle carbon intensity of the different production processes for the potentially green fuel. It focuses measures on advanced manufacturing competitiveness on “clean technologies, including electric vehicle and battery manufacturing,” and cites ongoing work on critical minerals like lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earth elements.

And it includes funding for a “strong and efficient federal impact assessment regime” for major projects that ensures benefits for Indigenous communities.

Not a Good Day for Fossils

The big surprise Thursday was Ottawa’s decision not beef up the existing federal subsidy for CCUS after the swashbuckling free enterprisers at the Pathways Alliance, which represents 95% of the country’s oilsands production, said they wouldn’t commit to CCUS development without a big increase in taxpayer subsidies. News coverage in the immediate aftermath focused on the 2% share buyback tax, with Business Council of Alberta President Adam Legge warning the measure could undercut fossil industry investment.

“It’s disappointing that Canada’s first commitment in response to the United States Inflation Reduction Act is a policy ‘stick’ rather than details around more incentives or ‘carrots’, which are what we need to get these investments moving,” Legge told the Globe and Mail in an email. “This policy will discourage investment, unduly affect Alberta businesses, and do very little to drive reinvestment into Canadian projects.”

CBC tallied the buybacks so far by major Pathways Alliance members at $18.7 billion—including $2.5 billion by Cenovus Energy, $4.6 billion by Suncor Energy, $5.1 billion by Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., and $6.5 billion by ConocoPhillips—adding that the 2% tax is expected to bring $2.1 billion to federal coffers over five years.

“Buybacks don’t improve or expand a company’s underlying business, but they have the effect of driving up share prices and improving various profitability metrics by reducing the amount of shares in the company, which investors tend to welcome,” the national broadcaster explained.

Despite the industry complaints, Pembina Institute Senior Advisor Scott MacDougall said the share buyback provision isn’t too far off the 1% tax the U.S. introduced in the IRA.

“It’s not going to stop share buybacks,” he said in an interview. “It’s not intended to. It’s really only intended to shift some of that money and redirect it back to Canada in terms of hopefully investments, hopefully jobs, and maybe even more hopefully, investments that are going to lead to decarbonization. But I guess time will tell.”

A ‘Change of Tone’, Details to Follow

The economic statement drew mixed reviews from climate and energy policy analysts, some of whom had been bracing for another big federal payday for the fossil industry.

“This is a welcome and encouraging change of tone, with a long overdue acknowledgment that Canada needs real green industrial policies in which workers play a central role,” said Aliénor Rougeot, climate and energy program manager at Environmental Defence Canada. But “as often with this government, a good promise now needs to be backed up by better plans. The proposed support to workers falls short of what is needed for the government to meet its promise of just transition, from too little money to too narrow a scope,” and Ottawa still hasn’t delivered on an approach where workers, Indigenous nations, and communities “are actually at the negotiating table.”

Julia Levin, national climate program manager at Environmental Defence, said the investment tax credit is just “a fraction of what is on offer in the United States,” and still falls just short of the CCUS tax credit in Freeland’s 2022 budget. While Ottawa “resisted fossil fuel lobbyists’ demands for huge new carbon capture subsidies,” Levin said, “there is still the risk of new money for carbon capture and fossil hydrogen if strong rules are not placed on the Canada Growth Fund and new hydrogen tax credit.”

Climate Emergency Unit Team Lead Seth Klein agreed the plan falls short of what government would do if it were really treating the climate crisis as an emergency. “Hate to be a wet blanket, but this seems like pretty thin gruel to me,” he tweeted.

Funding for training, apprenticeships, and sustainable jobs adds up to just $310 million over five years, Klein noted. The clean technologies credit “is actually pretty light with respect to the spending needed on decarbonization,” and the overall strategy is based on “attracting private investment (in a ‘competition’ with other jurisdictions), rather than using government spending to generate new investment.”

The overall sense is of a government that “seems so reticent to actually spend real dollars directly on the climate infrastructure we need,” he wrote. “Also, where the hell is a windfall profit tax on oil and gas companies and all the other industries profiteering on the current crises? Its absence is a huge lost opportunity to show how we act with social solidarity.”

Vanessa Corkal, senior policy advisor on clean energy transitions at the Winnipeg-based International Institute for Sustainable Development, called the sustainable jobs announcement a good start. “But just transition will require much more funding to meaningfully get off the ground, and we’re still waiting for legislation to entrench key principles and creation of a just transition strategy for Canada,” she said in an email.

Like Levin, Corkal said her organization would be keeping a close eye on the Canada Growth Fund and the hydrogen tax credit to make sure there’s no financial support for CCS—or for “blue” hydrogen projects that won’t be cost-competitive beyond 2030.

The Pembina Institute called the 2% tax on share buybacks “an indication that the federal government wants to see Canada’s oil and gas sector invest its record profits in Canada, and in a way that is aligned with the sector’s need to urgently reduce emissions.”

Klein interpreted the economic statement’s emphasis on concessional loans and contracts for difference as a way to “offer private investors a risk guarantee against the very real possibility that the Conservatives will get elected and reverse the carbon price.” MacDougall said the contracts for difference “will work with and not compete with Canada’s existing carbon pricing system and help manage risk of future changes and impacts of the carbon price signal” coming from the federal rules.



in Batteries / Storage, Buildings & Infrastructure, Canada, CCS & Negative Emissions, Demand & Efficiency, Electric Mobility & Auto, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Finance & Investment, First Peoples, Hydrogen, Hydropower, Jobs & Training, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Solar, Sub-National Governments, Tar Sands / Oil Sands, Wind

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons
Cities & Communities

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
1
Solarimo/pixabay
Ending Emissions

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

September 28, 2023
2
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation
Ontario

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 28, 2023
151

Comments 1

  1. Ken Summers says:
    11 months ago

    Julia Levin, national climate program manager at Environmental Defence, said …. “there is still the risk of new money for carbon capture and fossil hydrogen if strong rules are not placed on the Canada Growth Fund and new hydrogen tax credit.”

    I’m thinking she is just putting that politely. Based on how committed the government is to the policy that it should not matter if it is blue or green- it seems deliberate that wanna be producers of blue hydrogen and ammonia (the same companies and factories that currently make the dirty ‘grey’ stuff from fossil gas) be able to use the tax credits for CCUS.
    The saving grace being that a 30% tax credit is nowhere near enough to make CCUS financially viable. But I say that not knowing whether the refundable tax credits can be used on top of CCUS credits announced last year.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
622
Mark Dixon/wikimedia commons

Hundreds of Thousands March in Global Climate Strike

September 19, 2023
211
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
749
Jason Blackeye/Unsplash

Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update

September 28, 2023
403
/Piqusels

‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak

September 19, 2023
845
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 28, 2023
151

Recent Posts

Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
1
Solarimo/pixabay

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

September 28, 2023
2
DiscoverEganville/wikimedia commons

EV Rentals to Improve Transportation Access for Ontario Townships

September 28, 2023
1
shopblocks/flickr

E-Bikes, Scooters Overwhelm Toronto Bike Lanes

September 28, 2023
2
kelly8843496 / Pixabay

Put Lower-Income Households First in Line for Low-Carbon Technologies: Samson

September 28, 2023
2
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 28, 2023
111
Next Post
CarlosE Duarte/wikimedia commons

Big Banks Deliver the Dollars for Polluting Amazon Oil Project

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}