• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark October 3, 2023
Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution October 2, 2023
Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback October 2, 2023
Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds October 2, 2023
UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit October 2, 2023
Next
Prev

Salesforce Carbon Market Boosts Transparency But Needs Tougher Criteria, Analyst Says

October 30, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

nathanmac87, Salesforce/wikimedia commons

nathanmac87, Salesforce/wikimedia commons

9
SHARES
 

The world’s biggest provider of customer relationship management (CRM) software is receiving a mixed assessment after opening a carbon credit marketplace to support climate action.

In a release last month, San Francisco-based Salesforce announced its Net Zero Marketplace as an attempt at a “trusted platform that makes carbon credit purchases simple and transparent, allowing organizations to accelerate climate-positive impact at scale.” With consultants predicting a US$50-billion market for voluntary carbon credits by 2030, Salesforce is pitching a catalogue of carbon credits rated by third parties, a “seamless ecommerce experience” for buying them, and education on climate issues for businesses and individuals.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

The marketplace launched last week with a mix of more than 60 renewable energy, forestry and land use, and household and community projects, with carbon credits priced between US$5.42 and $30.16 per tonne.

“The uptick in extreme weather events shows that no one is spared from climate change—we need smart climate solutions now,” Salesforce Executive VP and Chief Impact Officer Suzanne DiBianca said in the September release. “Businesses aiming to achieve long-term emission reductions can complement their efforts with high-quality carbon credits.”

Carbon credits and carbon markets have been intensely controversial and often unsuccessful over the years, raising suspicions about whether projects deliver the promised carbon reductions, whether they would have happened anyway without the credit, and whether they seize control of forests or other natural capital by disenfranchising Indigenous communities. Carbon market advocates often insist that offsets are only meant to supplement actual emission reductions, not replace them. But that hasn’t stopped fossil companies and other big carbon polluters from claiming they can keep on increasing emissions once they have offsets in place.

Salesforce acknowledged that skepticism in the original PR for its new marketplace, emphasizing “high-quality credits” verified by a half-dozen different carbon credit providers. The offer hinges on “unprecedented transparency for a carbon credit marketplace where everyone can access project pricing and third-party ratings,” with the company’s existing e-commerce platform making the actual purchase easier and more seamless.

“What we see when we look at the voluntary carbon market is a fairly small number of marketplace participants, a fairly low volume of quality products, a very small number of third-party reviewers of projects, and we’d like all of that to change,” Ari Alexander, general manager of the company’s Net Zero Cloud and Net Zero Marketplace, told The Energy Mix in mid-October. “We’re trying to shine a light on the state of the market today and invite all that is real and all that is true to be seen on this marketplace.”

If it works, he added, the new platform will “drastically accelerate the number of buyers and credits, the amount of trust and transparency, and therefore the amount of quality,” at a time of “very high demand for these products as part of the net-zero journeys of every organization around the world.”

Gilles Dufrasne, policy officer at Carbon Market Watch, said Salesforce’s promise of public and transparent ratings for carbon offsets “is a helpful addition and something that other platforms are often missing.” But the marketplace “still offers very low-quality products,” some of them trying to earn payments for avoided deforestation, and the site makes “no clear connection between the price of a credit on the platform and its rating.”

Dufrasne said he did see potential for an organization as big as Salesforce to drive up the number of quality offset products and help set a standard for quality and transparency.

“If they adopted more stringent criteria, such as refusing to sell credits from lower-quality projects, this could set a positive and interesting precedent for the rest of the market to follow,” he told The Mix. “They could also screen their buyers and only allow companies to buy if they have an ambitious and credible climate strategy in place. This would help alleviate some of the greenwashing risks that come from offering this type of service.”

Asked whether Salesforce had ever seen a carbon offset or removal project that it would reject, Alexander said the marketplace would leave those decisions up to its users. Salesforce went through a “diligence process” to identify partners for the marketplace, so “rather than submitted and rejected, we think of what we go to market with as a result of that process,” he explained.

“There are a lot of projects in the world that have not really had a lot of eyes on them yet, or where a small number of external reviews have publicly come out with criticism,” he said. “It’s very much in the interest of transparency in the marketplace for us to be quite clear with the global audience where that information has come to light. So we’re actually supportive of critical information about specific projects, in order to drive the transparency that ultimately serves the market overall.”

With different expert bodies weighing in with their own definitions of a quality offset, he said the marketplace will “make available for everyone to see all these stakeholders in the debate, rather than Salesforce deciding what quality looks like.”

Continue Reading



in Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Ending Emissions, Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Finance & Investment, First Peoples, Forests & Deforestation

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Tar Sands / Oil Sands

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark

October 3, 2023
147
Dawn Ellner/flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
62
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia
Finance & Investment

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
142

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark

October 3, 2023
147
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
142
Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
359
YouTube

UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit

October 3, 2023
75
Solarimo/pixabay

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

October 2, 2023
261
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
880

Recent Posts

Dawn Ellner/flickr

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
62
Northvolt plant in Sweden, Spisen/wikimedia commons

Quebec Lands $7B Battery Gigafactory Investment from Sweden’s Northvolt

October 2, 2023
62
GFDL/Wikimedia Commons

Clean Energy Funding Isn’t Just About Money, Policy Expert Warns

October 2, 2023
39
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wikimedia Commons

Climate Change Brings Rapid Ice Loss to Antarctica, Arctic, Swiss Glaciers

October 2, 2023
58
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 28, 2023
221
DiscoverEganville/wikimedia commons

EV Rentals to Improve Transportation Access for Ontario Townships

September 28, 2023
82
Next Post
Håkan Dahlström/flickr

UK Ad Watchdog Scolds HSBC for Greenwashing

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}