• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas September 21, 2023
Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote September 20, 2023
Indoor Heat Leaves Canadians Unsafe with ‘No Escape’, CBC Investigation Finds September 20, 2023
Agrivoltaics a Win-Win for Farmers, Communities, Solar Developers, and Alberta’s UCP September 20, 2023
‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak September 19, 2023
Next
Prev

‘Smokescreen’ Masks $17B Taxpayer Cost for Trans Mountain Pipeline

October 13, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: The Energy Mix staff

APTN National News/Twitter

APTN National News/Twitter

43
SHARES
 

The federal government is relying on “irrelevant” analysis and a “smokescreen” on public information to justify the $17 billion Canadian taxpayers are likely to pay for the controversial Trans Mountain pipeline, a veteran analyst warns.

A report last week by independent economist Robyn Allan, a former president and CEO of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, says Trans Mountain wasn’t a financially sound venture when the federal cabinet decided to buy Canadians a pipeline in 2018, and it isn’t commercially viable today. Contrary to assurances from Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland that “no additional public money” will go into the $21.4-billion megaproject, “this lack of profitability and commercial viability means more than $17 billion in debt owed to Canadians will not be repaid,” writes West Coast Environmental Law in a synopsis of the report.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

With Allan reporting that Trans Mountain’s contracts with oil shippers are priced too low to make the pipeline profitable, WCEL adds, “debt forgiveness is looming.”

Allan’s report lays out a complicated corporate structure in which a federal Crown corporation, the Canadian Development Investment Corporation (CDEV), set up a subsidiary called TMP Finance to funnel financing to the pipeline. CDEV originally said TMP Finance was needed to “acquire, finance and provide strategic direction of Trans Mountain Corporation,” Allan writes, citing a CDEV quarterly report from 2018.

But it’s hard to provide strategic direction from a company that has no staff, and the federally-owned Trans Mountain could just as easily have received its funding directly from government coffers. But “had it done so, Trans Mountain’s losses and compromised commercial viability could not be hidden from view,” Allan writes. “And herein lies the function of TMP Finance.”

She says the subsidiary’s purpose is mask the project’s true financial position, continue funnelling taxpayer support, and step up in the future “to book the debt write-offs necessary to continue Trans Mountain’s façade of profitability and viability.”

In an October 7 email, Finance Canada spokesperson Caroline Thériault reiterated that “no additional public money will be spent on the project,” and that funding to complete the pipeline will come from third-party financing. She cited financial analyses by BMO Capital Markets and TD Securities that declared the project financially viable, even after its price tag ballooned from $5.4 to $21.4 billion.

Allan said it’s impossible to assess that claim because Ottawa has never released the two reports, but the limited information available is not encouraging.

“Finance Canada defines viability differently than Canadians do,” she told The Energy Mix in an email. “Finance simply asks if operating costs can be covered from the revenues received by oil product shippers. They stop short of protecting the interests of Canadian taxpayers because they do not incorporate the payment of interest and the repayment of debt owed to us.”

BMO and TD also appear to have assessed Trans Mountain’s viability over a 100-year repayment period, not the more realistic 20 years that Texas-based Kinder Morgan used before it sold the project off to the federal government. The extended payback “supports the conclusion that the project is not viable since an unrealistic time horizon—one that requires 10 decades of assumptions on revenues, expenses, and project utilization—is being relied on,” Allan wrote.

That technique “tells us that the interest expense and debt obligation will not be met,” she added. “If anything, Finance Canada pointing to TD and BMO recent analysis with [the] 100-year cut-off date tells us Ottawa already accepts that $17 billion in debt owed to Canadians will not be repaid.”

To make Trans Mountain commercially viable, “this debt will need to be written off at taxpayers’ expense and as a huge subsidy to the oil sector,” Allan wrote. “The prudent solution is to cancel the project unless the tolls charged oil product shippers are raised high enough to pay for the debt incurred to build them a pipeline and cover all the operating costs as they use it.”

Continue Reading



in Canada, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Finance & Investment, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

UN Climate Change/flickr
COP Conferences

BREAKING: Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas

September 21, 2023
203
Jon Sullivan/flickr
Ontario

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
517
Jeremy Bezanger/Unsplash
Heat & Temperature

Indoor Heat Leaves Canadians Unsafe with ‘No Escape’, CBC Investigation Finds

September 20, 2023
32

Comments 2

  1. Herb Wiseman says:
    11 months ago

    Taxpayer money likely did NOT go into funding the pipeline unless provinces contributed. Sovereign currency issuing nations like Canada do not require taxes to fund federal spending. For more information read the NYTimes best selling book The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy by Professor Stephanie Kelton. Or watch her TEDx: Monterey video or many other videos on YouTube.

    That is NOT to say that it was a good thing to build it but honesty about the financing increases your credibility with me. Dishonesty decreases your credibility and I do not share with those following me.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      11 months ago

      Thanks, Herb. I think the point Allan is making is that if (she would say when) the debt is eventually forgiven, it will come out of federal coffers.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

UN Climate Change/flickr

BREAKING: Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas

September 21, 2023
203
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
517
Asurnipal/wikimedia commons

Agrivoltaics a Win-Win for Farmers, Communities, Solar Developers, and Alberta’s UCP

September 20, 2023
108
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
81
Mr Renewables/Wikipedia

Californians Fight for New Community Solar Plan

September 20, 2023
80
Kristoferb/Wikimedia Commons

Canadians Could Save $10.4B, Cut Climate Pollution by Replacing Central Air with Heat Pumps

August 28, 2023
669

Recent Posts

Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
66
Jeremy Bezanger/Unsplash

Indoor Heat Leaves Canadians Unsafe with ‘No Escape’, CBC Investigation Finds

September 20, 2023
32
Wesley Fryer/flickr

Smart Thermostats Boost Grid Stability Amid Intense Heat

September 20, 2023
31
Plug'n Drive/Wikimedia Commons

Rural Carshares Ensure EV Push Leaves No One Behind

September 20, 2023
24
/Piqusels

‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak

September 19, 2023
405
Clean Creatives

‘Turning Point’ for PR Industry as Clean Creatives Targets Fossil Industry Contracts

September 19, 2023
256
Next Post
The Atmospheric Fund/Twitter

Informed, Engaged Citizens Drive Municipal Climate Action, Miller Says

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}