• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Didn’t Tell First Nation October 3, 2023
Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution October 2, 2023
Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback October 2, 2023
Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds October 2, 2023
UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit October 2, 2023
Next
Prev

 Study Finds Outsized Corporate Influence on UN Aviation Emissions Talks

October 5, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by Christopher Bonasia @CBonasia_

MarcusObal/Wikimedia

MarcusObal/Wikimedia

1
SHARES
 

The United Nations aviation agency has allowed corporate interests to influence the direction of its climate policy, say environmental groups, pointing to new research that finds nearly one-third of delegates at its environmental committee meetings come from aviation or fossil fuel industries.

And the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP) “appears to adopt numerous concerning transparency practices that are not replicated in other major UN climate negotiation forums,” says InfluenceMap.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“These include requiring delegates to sign non-disclosure agreements to participate, and prohibiting the media from attending key climate negotiations.”

InfluenceMap’s study found the aviation industry had “outsized influence over global climate rules” and a “significant opportunity” to influence ICAO climate negotiations—free from public scrutiny—with more than 30% of delegates coming from the fossil or aviation industry since the adoption of the 2015 Paris agreement. They outnumbered environmental delegates by more than seven to one, the study found.

ICAO also appears to draw from the International Air Transport Association (IATA), an organization that represents the airline industry, when crafting legislation, Influence Map says. IATA “seemed to have first proposed a similar measure to, and subsequently helped develop, and later propose weakening, ICAO’s main climate rule—the CORSIA offsetting scheme, which the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has since confirmed ‘does not lead to a reduction in in-sector emissions’ from aviation.”

The ICAO was designated by the 1997 Kyoto Protocol to govern carbon emissions from the aviation sector, and continues to be the primary entity responsible for its mitigation actions. Because of the ICAO’s presumed authority (and responding to the industry’s intensive lobbying), signatories of the 2015 Paris agreement did not explicitly include the aviation industry under oversight of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). But ICAO has since faced criticism for failing to commit to targets that align with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C—and international aviation emissions are expected to double or triple between 2019 and 2050.

ICAO is currently meeting in Montreal for its 41st general assembly to make plans for achieving emissions reduction targets. Delegates expect to discuss three emissions scenarios, but none of them are anywhere near Paris compatible, says Climate Action Tracker.

“There seems no real will in the aviation sector to reduce their own emissions to anything like zero, despite the Paris agreement being clear that all sectors need to do so,” said Silke Mooldijk from Climate Action Tracker’s partner organization, NewClimate Institute.

The Climate Action Tracker analysis finds the aviation industry will need to reduce emissions 90% from 2019 levels before 2050 to align with Paris goals. But even the most effective scenario available would only cut emissions 70%, while the least ambitious would allow them to increase by 50%. Measured against Climate Action Tracker’s 1.5°C rating scale, this outcome would register as either “highly insufficient” or “critically insufficient,” aligning with global warming levels of at least 3°C, and possibly even 4°C.

An important part of ICAO’s plan to slash emissions is its Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). But Climate Action Tracker says CORSIA’s rules are weak and lack environmental integrity. For instance, though CORSIA calls for using fuels that generate 10% fewer emissions than standard aviation fuels, the rule could potentially allow for a wide range of fossil fuels to be deemed eligible.

Transport & Environment (T&E) has also criticized the scheme, which adds a carbon offset charge of only €2.40 (C$3.23) to the price of an average Europe-United States flight in 2030, and €2 (C$2.69) to a London-New York flight.

Offsetting is “a climate fraud perpetrated by an industry resisting real climate action,” said T&E aviation director Jo Dardenne. “Paying €2 to fly ‘guilt-free’ to New York is a climate absurdity.” According to T&E calculations, CORSIA would offset 8.6 million tonnes of carbon dioxide for all the flights from Europe to the U.S. in 2030, but emissions are predicted to reach 23.5 million tonnes just from the growth in air traffic.

And CORSIA, by its nature, “does not lead to a reduction in in-sector emissions from aviation since the program deals mostly in approved offsets,” found the IPCC.

Even some airline CEOs have criticized the industry’s focus on offsetting to decarbonize the sector, notes InfluenceMap. Etihad CEO Tony Douglas said offsetting is “a short-term stopgap if you haven’t got a more sustainable alternative, but it’s cheating,” while United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby confessed that “the truth is that carbon offsets, most of them, aren’t even real.”



in Air & Marine, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Energy Politics, International Agencies & Studies, Legal & Regulatory, Travel, Leisure & Recreation

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Tar Sands / Oil Sands

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Didn’t Tell First Nation

October 3, 2023
1
Dawn Ellner/flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
2
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia
Finance & Investment

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
321
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
857
Solarimo/pixabay

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

October 2, 2023
211
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 28, 2023
174
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
728
McDonald's/flickr

McDonald’s Failing to Follow Through on Climate Promises, Critics Say

December 17, 2021
2.6k

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Didn’t Tell First Nation

October 3, 2023
1
Dawn Ellner/flickr

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
2
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
2
Northvolt plant in Sweden, Spisen/wikimedia commons

Quebec Lands $7B Battery Gigafactory Investment from Sweden’s Northvolt

October 2, 2023
2
YouTube

UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit

October 3, 2023
8
GFDL/Wikimedia Commons

Clean Energy Funding Isn’t Just About Money, Policy Expert Warns

October 2, 2023
4
Next Post
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}