The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

Brazil Forest Loss Falls 89% if Lula Beats Bolsonaro, Study Finds

September 29, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes

Alex Rio Brazil/Wikimedia Commons

Alex Rio Brazil/Wikimedia Commons

New analysis shows that forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon could drop by 89% if incumbent president Jair Bolsonaro is voted out of office in this Sunday’s general election.

An area of 75,960 square kilometres of the Amazon, roughly the size of Panama, could be saved from destruction by 2030 if Bolsonaro’s left-wing challenger and two-term former president—Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula—emerges victorious, reports Carbon Brief.

Voting out Bolsonaro would also significantly curb Brazil’s emissions when accompanied by a new focus on forest restoration, the climate news website adds, citing University of Oxford analysis that models Brazil’s implementation of its Forest Code.

Though many factors affect the Amazon’s future, “the results highlight the impact that enforcing environmental legislation could have after years of neglect under Brazil’s current right-wing leader,” Carbon Brief says.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

Deforestation is the main driver of Brazil’s emissions, the sixth highest of any country in the world, and it has accelerated under Bolsonaro’s weak environmental governance. In contrast, between 2003 and 2010 when Lula was president, the rate of forest loss dropped by three-quarters from peak levels in 2004. Deforestation rates remained low during the term of Lula’s successor Dilma Rouseff, until her impeachment in 2016.

Polls show Lula with roughly 50% of the votes—with some indicating as much as 52%—putting him roughly 10 points ahead of Bolsonaro and within reach of a first-round election win on Sunday. The campaign will continue into a runoff October 30 if neither candidate receives a clear majority.

The Oxford analysis compares projected deforestation rates following each candidate’s potential presidency and assumes that the differing deforestation trends will continue until 2050. A central difference is how each president will enforce the Forest Code, Brazil’s main law against deforestation. While the code requires landowners to preserve a certain portion of forest on their property and to restore illegally deforested land, it has been poorly enforced during Bolsonaro’s presidency and has been changed over the past decade to benefit landowners.

The projections assume that Lula, if elected, would follow through on pledges to reduce deforestation rates, while Bolsonaro would continue his track record of environmental deregulation.

“If he remains in power in 2023, no one should expect that Bolsonaro’s war against the Amazon, Indigenous people, environmental legislation, including the Forest Code, and science to monitor forests and land use to change,” said Carlos Rittl, a senior policy advisor at Rainforest Foundation Norway.

In a baseline scenario that projects continued deforestation unchecked by the Forest Code, annual losses stay above an average of 10,000 square kilometres this decade. Under a Lula presidency that reprises his past track record, levels would drop by 89%, say the researchers, from 13,038 to 1,480 kilometres from 2021 to the end of the decade.

Complete enforcement of deforestation regulation could be difficult, but the 89% drop is comparable to Lula’s earlier presidency, say experts, and they are optimistic about his adherence to the Forest Code.

“Lula has a track record of conservation and control policies from past mandates Code,” said Dr Grace Iara Souza, a fellow of the King’s College Brazil Institute. “There is hope that Lula’s government will be mindful of the global climate change and the Amazonian tipping point concerns and will restore the forest.”

Still, many regions most vulnerable to farmland conversion aren’t located within the Amazon, and experts say 330,000 square kilometres of native vegetation would disappear by 2050 even in a best-case scenario.

And meanwhile, Lula’s current lead may not be enough to avoid a second-round vote in a controversial election marred by a rise in political violence, and which Bolsonaro is already preparing to contest if he loses. He is likely to employ the “Big Lie” strategy that failed U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump used to undermine the 2020 U.S. election results, reports NPR.







in Biodiversity & Habitat, Brazil, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Climate Equity & Justice, Forests & Deforestation, Legal & Regulatory

Trending Stories

Sarah Yurchevich
Data Centres & Tech

Alberta Woman Maps Out the Facts About Power-Hungry Data Centres

August 25, 2026
645
picryl
Canadian Sovereignty

Trump Trade War Could Be a Catalyst to Speed Canada’s Energy Transition, Experts Say

August 25, 2026
577
Facebook
Severe Storms & Flooding

160 Dead, Hundreds Missing as Towering Flash Flood in Nepal Points to Extreme Heat, Heavy Rainfalls

August 26, 2026
576

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

Related Articles

Brazil Set To Roll Back Environmental Safeguards Ahead of COP 30 Climate Talks

Brazil Set To Roll Back Environmental Safeguards Ahead of COP 30 Climate Talks

July 28, 2025
Brazil Fast-Tracks Oil and Highway Projects That Threaten the Amazon

Brazil Fast-Tracks Oil and Highway Projects That Threaten the Amazon

June 11, 2025
Brazil Will Crack Down on Illegal Logging, Finance Forest Protection, Lula Tells COP 27

Brazil Will Crack Down on Illegal Logging, Finance Forest Protection, Lula Tells COP 27

November 18, 2022

The End of the World vs. the End of the Week: Carney’s Pushback on Trump’s Bullying Could Point to the Next Energy Transition Moment

by Mitchell Beer
August 23, 2026

…

Follow Us

Brazil Forest Loss Falls 89% if Lula Beats Bolsonaro, Study Finds

September 29, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes

Alex Rio Brazil/Wikimedia Commons

Alex Rio Brazil/Wikimedia Commons

New analysis shows that forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon could drop by 89% if incumbent president Jair Bolsonaro is voted out of office in this Sunday’s general election.

An area of 75,960 square kilometres of the Amazon, roughly the size of Panama, could be saved from destruction by 2030 if Bolsonaro’s left-wing challenger and two-term former president—Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula—emerges victorious, reports Carbon Brief.

Voting out Bolsonaro would also significantly curb Brazil’s emissions when accompanied by a new focus on forest restoration, the climate news website adds, citing University of Oxford analysis that models Brazil’s implementation of its Forest Code.

Though many factors affect the Amazon’s future, “the results highlight the impact that enforcing environmental legislation could have after years of neglect under Brazil’s current right-wing leader,” Carbon Brief says.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

Deforestation is the main driver of Brazil’s emissions, the sixth highest of any country in the world, and it has accelerated under Bolsonaro’s weak environmental governance. In contrast, between 2003 and 2010 when Lula was president, the rate of forest loss dropped by three-quarters from peak levels in 2004. Deforestation rates remained low during the term of Lula’s successor Dilma Rouseff, until her impeachment in 2016.

Polls show Lula with roughly 50% of the votes—with some indicating as much as 52%—putting him roughly 10 points ahead of Bolsonaro and within reach of a first-round election win on Sunday. The campaign will continue into a runoff October 30 if neither candidate receives a clear majority.

The Oxford analysis compares projected deforestation rates following each candidate’s potential presidency and assumes that the differing deforestation trends will continue until 2050. A central difference is how each president will enforce the Forest Code, Brazil’s main law against deforestation. While the code requires landowners to preserve a certain portion of forest on their property and to restore illegally deforested land, it has been poorly enforced during Bolsonaro’s presidency and has been changed over the past decade to benefit landowners.

The projections assume that Lula, if elected, would follow through on pledges to reduce deforestation rates, while Bolsonaro would continue his track record of environmental deregulation.

“If he remains in power in 2023, no one should expect that Bolsonaro’s war against the Amazon, Indigenous people, environmental legislation, including the Forest Code, and science to monitor forests and land use to change,” said Carlos Rittl, a senior policy advisor at Rainforest Foundation Norway.

In a baseline scenario that projects continued deforestation unchecked by the Forest Code, annual losses stay above an average of 10,000 square kilometres this decade. Under a Lula presidency that reprises his past track record, levels would drop by 89%, say the researchers, from 13,038 to 1,480 kilometres from 2021 to the end of the decade.

Complete enforcement of deforestation regulation could be difficult, but the 89% drop is comparable to Lula’s earlier presidency, say experts, and they are optimistic about his adherence to the Forest Code.

“Lula has a track record of conservation and control policies from past mandates Code,” said Dr Grace Iara Souza, a fellow of the King’s College Brazil Institute. “There is hope that Lula’s government will be mindful of the global climate change and the Amazonian tipping point concerns and will restore the forest.”

Still, many regions most vulnerable to farmland conversion aren’t located within the Amazon, and experts say 330,000 square kilometres of native vegetation would disappear by 2050 even in a best-case scenario.

And meanwhile, Lula’s current lead may not be enough to avoid a second-round vote in a controversial election marred by a rise in political violence, and which Bolsonaro is already preparing to contest if he loses. He is likely to employ the “Big Lie” strategy that failed U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump used to undermine the 2020 U.S. election results, reports NPR.







in Biodiversity & Habitat, Brazil, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Climate Equity & Justice, Forests & Deforestation, Legal & Regulatory

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Related Articles

Brazil Set To Roll Back Environmental Safeguards Ahead of COP 30 Climate Talks

Brazil Set To Roll Back Environmental Safeguards Ahead of COP 30 Climate Talks

July 28, 2025
Brazil Fast-Tracks Oil and Highway Projects That Threaten the Amazon

Brazil Fast-Tracks Oil and Highway Projects That Threaten the Amazon

June 11, 2025
Brazil Will Crack Down on Illegal Logging, Finance Forest Protection, Lula Tells COP 27

Brazil Will Crack Down on Illegal Logging, Finance Forest Protection, Lula Tells COP 27

November 18, 2022

Trending Stories

Sarah Yurchevich

Alberta Woman Maps Out the Facts About Power-Hungry Data Centres

August 25, 2026
645
picryl

Trump Trade War Could Be a Catalyst to Speed Canada’s Energy Transition, Experts Say

August 25, 2026
577
Facebook

160 Dead, Hundreds Missing as Towering Flash Flood in Nepal Points to Extreme Heat, Heavy Rainfalls

August 26, 2026
576

The End of the World vs. the End of the Week: Carney’s Pushback on Trump’s Bullying Could Point to the Next Energy Transition Moment

by Mitchell Beer
August 23, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.