• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA June 4, 2023
Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest June 4, 2023
Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing June 4, 2023
2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season June 4, 2023
Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion? June 1, 2023
Next
Prev

UK Nuclear Plan Faces High Costs and Delays, Public Opposition

September 11, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Paul Brown @pbrown4348

Ivor Branton/geograph.org.uk

Ivor Branton/geograph.org.uk

13
SHARES
 

The incoming British government is committed to building a new generation of nuclear power stations to provide a quarter of the  nation’s electricity. But how it is going to happen remains a mystery.

In a statement made in the minutes before the death of Queen Elizabeth II was announced Thursday, the new British Prime Minister, Liz Truss, promised that the new organization Great British Nuclear would be launched in the coming months, with a mandate to plan and deliver a generation of reactors to provide 25% of the UK’s energy electricity needs.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

With Britain’s ageing fleet of advanced gas-cooled reactors already closing because of cracks in their graphite cores, this means replacing units on multiple sites. The government is already funding research and development into small modular reactors and nuclear fusion, but there is no sight of any new designs actually being built.

What is in the project pipeline is four giant European Pressurized Water Reactors (EPRs), a French design that is proving deeply problematic both in terms of delays and escalating costs. Two reactors have been under construction at Hinkley Point in Somerset for four years and are currently expected to begin generating electricity in 2027—10 years later than originally planned.

Key to the future rollout of the UK’s ambitious nuclear program is a decision on the second two EPR reactors planned for Sizewell C on the Suffolk coast.  Between them, all four reactors would provide electricity for up to 12 million homes, or about 10% of the UK’s needs—that is assuming that they work as planned.

Earlier this month, in his last policy speech as outgoing prime minister, Boris Johnson promised £700 million of government money to try and get the Sizewell project off the ground. This is not to help with construction costs, but merely the preparatory work to get the plans to the final investment decision—at which point someone will have to find between £20 and £30 billion (US$23.1 to $34.70 billion) to actually build them.

One of the reasons the British government was forced to put money into the project was that the Sizewell EPRs were originally going to be a partnership between the French and Chinese. The increasing hostility between the UK and China has meant the Conservative government is essentially freezing China out of the project for security reasons.

Behind the scenes, that is causing serious problems for the project, mainly because someone else has to put up the money to build the station. The cash-strapped French nuclear company EDF simply has not got the money—it is already close to technically bankrupt and is being taken back into 100% ownership by the French state to avoid such a financial calamity.

The British government plans to raise part of the money by making consumers pay a levy on their bills to finance the station, in effect a nuclear tax. But in a world of soaring energy bills, this is not going to find favour with bill payers who will get no benefit for decades, if at all. The new tax is unlikely to be levied in the current crisis, so instead government ministers are approaching Middle East states asking them to invest in the project.  So far, there have been no takers.

Meanwhile, things are not going well for either Hinkley Point or Sizewell. It was reported in the French press that Boris Johnson’s announcement of the injection of £700 million for Sizewell was intended to be part of a deal announced with EDF for the French government to make a similar commitment. Instead the French refused and delayed any decision until an auditor’s report has been produced—an ominous sign.

At Hinkley Point, an application by EDF not to fit acoustic fish warning devices to its water cooling intake pipes because it would be too dangerous for divers was refused by the Department of Environment. The calculation that 800 million fish a year would be killed by the intakes, including protected species like salmon, proved too much for the planning inspector, and he was backed by ministers.

That will be ominous for Sizewell C, too, because these reactors have exactly the same cooling requirements and will need similarly expensive fish deterrents.

Perhaps the EDF and the UK government’s biggest handicap (apart from the money) is public opinion. Britain has a thriving wind sector, the second-largest offshore wind industry in the world. The price of electricity it produces is currently one third of new nuclear and continuing to fall. Many new wind projects are under development or construction, and all will be finished before Hinkley is completed or Sizewell is half built.

Solar is cheaper than offshore wind and only marginally more expensive than onshore turbines. Both are very popular with voters but onshore wind farms are virtually banned in England because of planning restrictions placed by previous Conservative governments.

Scotland has different laws and a thriving onshore industry, bringing many jobs and nearly 100% renewable energy. The devolved government also has a resolve not to allow any new nuclear stations, further restricting the chances of a string of stations being built in the UK.

And around Sizewell in Suffolk, resistance to the new reactors is strong, given a boost by the planning Inspector’s recommendation that the application to build the station should be refused.

This recommendation was overturned by the government, but now protestors will have their day in court contesting the political decision as unlawful.

None of this makes the nuclear industry look very inviting to potential investors.



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Clean Electricity Grid, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Climate News Network, Ending Emissions, Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Finance & Investment, Jobs & Training, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Nuclear, Solar, UK & Europe, Wind

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

sunrise windmill
International Agencies & Studies

Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA

June 5, 2023
143
Pixabay
Solar

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
127
Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr
Cities & Communities

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 5, 2023
83

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
14.6k
Natural Resources Canada

2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season

June 4, 2023
163
sunrise windmill

Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA

June 5, 2023
143
Pixabay

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
127
Clairewych/Pixabay

Demand Surges for Giant Heat Pumps as Europe Turns to District Heating

June 4, 2023
83
Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 5, 2023
83

Recent Posts

nicolasdebraypointcom/pixabay

Factor Gender into Transportation Planning, IISD Analyst Urges Policy-Makers

June 4, 2023
37
moerschy / Pixabay

Federal Climate Plans Must Embrace Community-Driven Resilience

June 4, 2023
54
debannja/Pixabay

Austin, Texas Council Committee Backs Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 4, 2023
87
Equinor

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
876
Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
78
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Notley

Notley Would Have Backed Carbon Capture Subsidies, Smith Less Certain: Ex-Pipeline Exec

June 1, 2023
100
Next Post
wood pellets biomass

Drop Forest Biomass from Renewables Subsidies, EU Leaders Urged

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}