• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev
Opinion & Analysis

Analysis: Lax Offshore Oil Regulation Puts Atlantic Canada Ecosystems, Communities at Risk

August 2, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Full Story: WWF-Canada @WWFCanada
Primary Author: Mark Brooks

Deepwater Horizon spill, 2010/Wikipedia

Deepwater Horizon spill, 2010/Wikipedia

1
SHARES
 

Offshore oil and gas activities in Atlantic Canada are a genuine threat to the ocean ecosystem and exacerbate climate change, but the federal government is falling short in its plans to regulate that activity, writes Mark Brooks, senior specialist, oil and gas at WWF-Canada, in a recent post on the WWF blog.

If a major spill or a well blowout (an uncontrolled release of crude oil after a pressure release system fails) was to occur in the Atlantic Ocean—where extreme weather and deepwater drilling are commonplace—it would seriously imperil the surrounding marine environment, potentially destroying habitat for whales, fish, sea birds, and many other animals.

The consequences for coastal communities, many of which depend on healthy, clean waters for their livelihoods, could be devastating.

The elevated risk of operating hundreds of kilometres offshore in an extreme environment makes it incumbent upon the Canadian government to ensure the world’s highest standard of safety and environmental protection for oil and gas operations.

The federal government recently proposed updated regulations for oil and gas operations in the offshore areas surrounding Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. Unfortunately, these regulations fall far short in ensuring safety and environmental protection.

In fact, the new rules do not even require the use of the best available and safest technologies on offshore installations and spill response equipment.

The proposed new regulations are notable for their inadequate provisions and for the critical issues they omit, Brooks says—most glaringly, climate change, drilling in ecologically or culturally sensitive areas, and Indigenous rights.

There are no requirements to ensure that a major oil spill could be contained within a specified time frame.

In Alaska, spill containment equipment such as oil well capping stacks must be onsite within 24 hours of an accident.

And after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout, the use of safety equipment (such as double shear rams) is now required in the Gulf of Mexico to provide backup in the event of equipment failure.

No such requirements exist in Canada’s proposed regulations.

The regulations also inexplicably do not prevent oil companies from drilling in ecologically sensitive marine ecosystems or in culturally important or high-risk areas. The North Atlantic has sensitive and unique ecosystems that are vulnerable to disturbance and many communities depend on a healthy marine environment for their subsistence, as well as their social, spiritual, and cultural well-being. These areas should be off-limits to drilling.

If a major accident does occur in the offshore, Canadians could be on the hook for billions of dollars in clean-up costs. Current regulations cap operator liability at C$1 billion, whereas the Deepwater Horizon spill reportedly cost US$62 billion in damages, and some studies have estimated the actual cost at $145 billion.

In Canada, liability is unlimited only if the operator is proven to be at fault. But if a serious accident were to take place as the result of a chance occurrence—such as a severe storm or iceberg collision, both made more likely by climate change—it’s not clear who would be responsible for the damages. The United Kingdom, Russia, and Greenland have unlimited liability for offshore oil and gas operators, meaning the operator is liable for pollution damage regardless of the reason.

Given the risks of a major offshore spill in the Atlantic, there can be no justification for companies to use cost as an excuse for not taking every necessary measure to reduce risk when effective and immediate oil spill response is in doubt. Norway’s citizens are informed about risk levels and individual company practices through a government website, so why aren’t we?

There are also no requirements in the new regulations to ensure that decisions about offshore oil and gas activities are consistent with Canadian carbon reduction commitments and Indigenous rights and agreements.

The regulator will not be obliged to recommend the rejection of a project that has an inadequate strategy to minimize or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions.

Meanwhile, in Greenland, the government must consider any negative impact on the climate when it decides whether to grant an offshore licence. This has led to the country’s recent decision to ban all future offshore oil exploration on environmental grounds.

Finally, the Atlantic offshore petroleum Boards will continue to be in charge of both ensuring the “maximum recovery of petroleum” and regulating the industry for safety and environmental protection.

Investigations into previous offshore accidents have highlighted the critical importance of separating responsibilities for production and safety under different agencies.

Canada is far behind other countries in ensuring that offshore oil and gas activities can be carried out safely with the lowest possible risk to local communities and the marine environment. We must do better.

This post originally appeared on the WWF-Canada blog. Republished with permission.



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, First Peoples, Health & Safety, Jobs & Training, Legal & Regulatory, Oceans, Oil & Gas, Opinion & Analysis, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

openthegovernment.org
United States

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
340
jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Energy Politics

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
137
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France
Nuclear

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
354

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
648
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
340
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
354
David Wilson/wikimedia commons

U.S. State Treasurers Use Public Office to Thwart Climate Action, Investigation Finds

August 7, 2022
139
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.7k
Green Energy Futures/flickr

Solar Shingle Buying Guide Lays Out Options for Curious Homeowners

August 7, 2022
159

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
137
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Canadians Share Stories of Fear, Vulnerability from 2021 Heat Dome

August 7, 2022
68
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 9, 2022
161
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Pacific Region/Wikimedia Commons

Australia Bans New Coal Mine to Protect Great Barrier Reef, Faces Call for Full Moratorium

August 7, 2022
78
The Come Up Show/flickr

Celebrities, Influencers See Backlash for Private Jet Emissions

August 7, 2022
63
alexxxis/Pixabay

Cambridge University to Rename BP Institute Following Student Backlash

August 7, 2022
48
Next Post
Vulcan Solar Park, site of the future Travers Solar Project, Green Energy Futures/flickr

Canadian Construction Giant Expects $800 Million in Solar Project Revenue

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}