• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update September 26, 2023
Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab September 25, 2023
Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie September 25, 2023
‘Apex Oil and Gas Lobby’ Undercuts Canadian Sovereignty, Laxer Tells Foreign Influence Probe September 25, 2023
Momentum Builds Toward COP 28 as Countries Back Fossil Fuel Phaseout September 25, 2023
Next
Prev

U.S. Fossil Defenders Influencing Canadian Resource Development

July 28, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes

Fortune Brainstorm TECH/flickr

Fortune Brainstorm TECH/flickr

13
SHARES
 

The outsized presence of American libertarian groups—pushing fossil interests in Canada at the expense of Indigenous energy rights and a free press—has been revealed in two recent reports by one intrepid journalist.

In an op-ed for the Guardian, veteran Canadian climate reporter Geoff Dembicki describes how the Atlas Network—a United States-based libertarian organization with global reach—“spent years pressuring the Canadian government” to discourage official efforts to align Canadian law with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), fearing it would codify Indigenous rights to reject natural resource development—especially of oil and gas—within their territories.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

And in a post for the Tyee published the same day, Dembicki reveals how a U.S. crisis management team, whose avowed mission is to defend its clients against “predatory” journalists, is now working for the Canadian Energy Centre, aka Alberta premier Jason Kenney’s “Energy War Room.”

In his exposé of the immense role the Atlas Network played in trying to ensure Canada never implements the UNDRIP, Dembicki writes that group calls itself a “worldwide freedom movement.” Nearly 500 partners have taken up the Atlas banner, including the Koch Industries-funded Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation, both notorious and extremely well-funded engines of climate denial.

The organization “should make people nervous,” Bob Neubauer, a researcher with the Corporate Mapping Project, told Dembicki. He said Atlas includes “a very significant number of the most influential right wing think tanks and advocacy organizations on the planet.” And amongst its roughly dozen Canadian partners is the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI). 

Atlas’ own records show that MLI availed itself of one of their Poverty & Freedom grants to launch “a sophisticated communications and outreach strategy to persuade the government, businesses, and Aboriginal communities on the dangers involved with fully adopting UNDRIP.”

A central component of the MLI’s strategy, writes Dembicki, was to recruit Indigenous representatives supportive of oil and gas development. Describing these recruits as “a shield against opponents,” Atlas also spoke of the need to safeguard Canada’s “monumental reserves of natural gas, hydroelectricity, potash, uranium, oil, and other natural resources” from UNDRIP.

Dembicki writes that Hayden King, executive director of the Yellowhead Institute, a Toronto-based Indigenous public policy think tank, described MLI’s campaign as “a contemporary expression of the type of imperialism that Indigenous peoples have been dealing with here for many, many years.”

While Ottawa did pass the legislation necessary to begin implementing UNDRIP last June, further progress has been glacial, and MLI has been very much on the scene, ensuring that Indigenous voices in favour of oil and gas development are heard.

One such voice is the Indian Resource Council (IRC). Speaking before a senate committee last year, IRC President Stephen Buffalo said there should be language in the legislation preventing “special interest groups” from being able to “weaponize” UNDRIP to block new pipelines.

“Whether or not you support the oil and gas industry, it is the right of the 131 nations of the Indian Resource Council of Canada to develop their resources as they see fit,” he added.

Atlas also identified the First Nations Major Projects Coalition as an ally “working directly” on the MLI campaign. But Dembicki, says a Major Projects Coalition spokesperson described that phrasing as “inaccurate,” pointing to the organization’s 2018 testimony in support of UNDRIP.

Meanwhile, in Alberta, the Canadian Energy Centre—created to push back journalists and activists who are critical of Canada’s oil and gas industry—has hired the U.S. crisis management firm Counterpoint Strategies to advise on communications related to energy issues south of the border.

In the Tyee, Dembicki quotes directly from Counterpoint’s promotional materials (password protected ever since he asked it for comment, but still available through the Wayback Machine archive). He describes a company prepared to tackle what it calls a “modern news media” that is “hostile, aggressive. and willing to disregard standards and collude with almost any antagonist.”

To “counter-attack” such hostility, Counterpoint promises to “leverage digital ads, expose the ulterior motives of adversaries, rally specialized allies, [and] discredit attacks.”

It also pledges to create websites that will “dismantle print articles,” and to launch legal proceedings before a story “is ever published or broadcast.”

As for how a journalist, or those with which they are “colluding” might avoid such attacks, Counterpoint writes that “opponents in the discourse are confronted with a choice—adhere to principles or face being discredited.”



in Canada, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Energy Politics, First Peoples, International Agencies & Studies, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Oil & Gas, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Jason Blackeye/Unsplash
International Agencies & Studies

BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update

September 26, 2023
213
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation
Ontario

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 25, 2023
89
UNDP/flickr
Heat & Power

Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie

September 26, 2023
102

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Jason Blackeye/Unsplash

BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update

September 26, 2023
213
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
388
Wilson Hui/flickr

‘Apex Oil and Gas Lobby’ Undercuts Canadian Sovereignty, Laxer Tells Foreign Influence Probe

September 26, 2023
102
UNDP/flickr

Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie

September 26, 2023
102
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 25, 2023
89
United Nations/Twitter

Momentum Builds Toward COP 28 as Countries Back Fossil Fuel Phaseout

September 26, 2023
80

Recent Posts

UniEnergy Technologies/wikimedia commons

Multi-Day Storage Can Deliver Cheaper Grid Reliability, Battery Maker Says

September 25, 2023
64
David Mellis/flickr

Top Food Brands Prepare for Supply Chains Disrupted by Climate Change

September 25, 2023
51
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 25, 2023
76
UN Climate Change/flickr

Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas

September 24, 2023
471
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
674
Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
128
Next Post
Christine Zenino/Wikimedia Commons

Extreme July Heat Brings Rapid Melting of Greenland’s Ice Sheet

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}