• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Ban Fossil Fuel Ads Like Tobacco Promos, Doctors Urge Ottawa June 10, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society Carbon Levels & Measurement

Fossils Won’t Hit 2030 Carbon Target Without Cutting Production, Federal Analysis Shows

June 14, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

kelly8843496 / Pixabay

kelly8843496 / Pixabay

1
SHARES
 

Internal analysis by federal officials raises tough questions about whether the Canadian fossil industry can achieve the 81 megatonnes of emissions cuts the Trudeau government has promised by 2030 without cutting production, according to confidential documents obtained by the Globe and Mail.

The government “has staked its reputation on achieving Canada’s climate goals—if it does, it would be the first time ever that the country met a promised emissions target,” the Globe reports. “But the documents underscore the uncertainty in the climate change plans and show the leap between what government officials can detail in expected cuts and how much more it hopes to push the industry to do through incentives, new rules, and higher costs.”

When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau released his updated 2030 target in March, it included what’s considered a steep reduction from a fossil sector that accounted for 26% of the country’s emissions in 2019—and the government took heat for not mandating steeper cuts. But by the time the PM made his announcement, “Ottawa’s own numbers indicated the industry could reach only about half of the 81-megatonne cut it was assigned,” the Globe writes, citing the documents from the federal environment and natural resources departments.

“The internal analysis reveals that more emissions cuts in the oil and gas sector, beyond what department officials assessed was ‘technically feasible,’ would likely come from production cuts,” the news story adds. But “several federal officials said the documents obtained by The Globe present an incomplete picture of how the critically important industry can reach its targets.”

The news story had the Globe’s editors recalling that they were “both positive and skeptical” when Trudeau first announced the target. “The reductions, as pictured by Ottawa, depend on transforming Canada’s relatively dirty oil into much lower-carbon barrels, without reducing oil production,” they wrote yesterday. “Technology as saviour, and salvation arriving in less than a decade.”

In March, the editorial board called that proposition “difficult”. Now, while the government insists its 2030 target is “doable”, the confidential document said even a “technically feasible” reduction of 43 megatonnes of fossil industry emissions would require “extraordinary efforts” and rely on “high risk” options—a category that includes the carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies that received lavish subsidies in the last federal budget. Though not enough, apparently, to get fossil industry leaders like Cenovus Energy CEO Alex Pourbaix onboard to invest.

The Globe’s coverage has details on the 42 or 43 megatonnes the internal analysts thought it was realistic for the industry to cut, along with commentary from an Environment and Climate Change Canada spokesperson who said the confidential documents gave an “incomplete picture” of “the full scale” of cuts the industry could achieve with technologies like CCS and direct air capture. Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault maintained in a statement that “our final analysis gets us to the 81-megatonne emission reduction for the oil and gas sector,” and officials in a private technical briefing told the Globe they stood by the figure.

Chris Bataille, an adjunct research fellow at the Columbia Center on Global Energy Policy, told the Globe that target would require “a quantum jump upward in effort from what’s been done in the past”. Dave Sawyer, principal economist at the Canadian Climate Institute, said his organization’s analysis had shown potential for 55 to 76 megatonnes, not far off the federal figure.

Those short-term targets would require “serious heavy lifting” from Environment Canada, Sawyer told the Globe, and would be “contingent on credible policy being developed and deployed as quickly as possible.”

Neither the internal analysis nor the Globe’s coverage got at the bigger question of whether that serious heavy lifting is worth the effort for a fossil sector that is moving rapidly into its sunset. Writing for Clean Energy Canada, Executive Director Mark Zacharias and Chief Innovation Officer Merran Smith, ran through all the reasons that an industry currently enjoying record profits will never see another price boom.

“It’s no secret that the oil and gas industry is cyclical: as prices drop, the music stops, the lights come on,” they write in a Globe and Mail op ed. “Historically, prices go back up, and the cycle repeats.”

But this time, “there is not likely to be another rebound in the oil and gas sector,” they warn. “The great irony now is that soaring fossil fuel prices will also contribute to the industry’s accelerated undoing. There will be no greater incentive for families and companies to shift away from something than brutally high bills amid broader inflation and a potential recession.”

And “this time, the incumbent has a fierce competitor,” led by electric vehicles, astonishingly affordable solar and wind power, and government policies driving for faster, deeper carbon cuts—all pointing to global oil demand peaking as soon as 2025, according to the International Energy Agency.

“The shift away from fossil fuels is accelerating, and it will be permanent, so it’s time for politicians, especially Western premiers, to name the opportunity and talk publicly about what this generational shift in our economy will look like over the next two decades,” Zacharias and Smith write. “The party always ends, but this time the club has been sold. We’re going to need to build a new one.”



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, CCS & Negative Emissions, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Oil & Gas, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Jason Woodhead/Flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
288
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay
Petrochemicals & Plastics

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
171
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr
International Agencies & Studies

Clean Energy Investment to Exceed $1.4T This Year, Still Falls Short of Climate Goals: IEA

June 24, 2022
80

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
288
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
171
zephylwer0/pixabay

North American Steel, Aluminium Giants Lumber Toward Green Transition

June 24, 2022
147
Nemaska Lithium/Facebook

Critical Minerals, Hydrogen Lead Ottawa’s Low-Carbon Industry Strategy

June 24, 2022
74
/PxFul

Canadian Farmers Offer Ottawa a Roadmap to Cut Agriculture Emissions

June 24, 2022
83
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.5k

Recent Posts

Erik Whalen/wikimedia commons

Yellowstone Park Reopens, But Flood Recovery Could Take Years, Cost Billions

June 24, 2022
60
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

Clean Energy Investment to Exceed $1.4T This Year, Still Falls Short of Climate Goals: IEA

June 24, 2022
80
Cjp24/Wikimedia Commons

UK Green Shift Won’t Repeat Job Destruction of Deindustrialization, Report Finds

June 24, 2022
29
Pavlofox/Pixabay

Millions Face Famine as Climate Disasters, Ukraine War Slash Food Supplies

June 24, 2022
38
Chris Lim/Wikimedia Commons

China Has 9 Times the Wind, Solar Potential It Needs for Carbon Neutrality

June 24, 2022
54
willenhallwench / Pixabay

PG&E Risks Greenwashing with Definition of ‘Scope 4’ Emissions

June 24, 2022
44
Next Post
TripodStories- AB/wikimedia commons

BREAKING: Energy Transition ‘Not Happening’ as Fossil Subsidies Fuel Historic Missed Opportunity

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}