• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance June 29, 2022
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society First Peoples

Lack of Consent Drives Indigenous Opposition to Ontario’s Ring of Fire Mining Plan

May 17, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Clifford Maynes @CJMaynes

Geocryologist/wikimedia commons

Geocryologist/wikimedia commons

28
SHARES
 

By pushing forward Ring of Fire mining and smelting development projects in northern Ontario, experts say federal and provincial governments are failing to recognize the right to free, informed, and prior consent enshrined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), ratified by the Canadian government.

UNDRIP recognizes the right of Indigenous peoples to give or withhold consent to a project that may affect them or their territories. But participants in a recent webinar hosted by Seniors for Climate Action Now (SCAN) heard that governments are running roughshod over this right in environmental review processes that are exclusively controlled by the state and outsider interests, without Indigenous participation in governance.

The legal right to consultation is recognized by Canadian law, including the right to receive information and provide input—but not the right to consent.

“The idea that Canada and the provinces have complete jurisdiction over Indigenous territory is simply not tenable,” said panelist Dayna Nadine Scott, associate professor at York University and expert in environmental law and justice in the green economy. “For Indigenous people it’s not Crown land, it’s homeland.”

Concerns about the development of the mineral-rich Ring of Fire—an area roughly the size of Germany—include environmental damage, loss of precarious wildlife populations like caribou, drinking water pollution, and loss of the Indigenous way of life, said Chief Wayne Moonias of Neskantaga First Nation, in a video shared with the webinar.

“We are ultimately talking about the survival of the species, since we all are relatives,” said panelist Donna Ashamock, a member of the Cree Nation and affiliated band member with the Fort Albany First Nation.

SCAN notes [pdf] that First Nations call the Ring of Fire region the “Breathing Lands,” with the two names reflecting the “divergent views of Settler and Indigenous cultures.” The region houses peatlands, “one of the world’s largest remaining intact storehouses of carbon,” whose disruption could release vast amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

The federal government’s regional assessment of the development has been a “lost opportunity” to establish the decision-making rights of Indigenous peoples, identify priorities for community investment, and set the rules of the game for subsequent project approvals, Scott said. Individual project approvals may proceed before it is finished, she added.

Previously, Premier Doug Ford’s government in Ontario “ripped up a 2014 agreement with the affected First Nations regarding the terms and conditions under which they would collectively consent to development,” says SCAN. Instead, the government pushed forward with environmental assessments for 450 kilometres of all-season roads that would serve mining development in the region, with two Indigenous communities, Marten Falls and Webequie, enlisted as proponents.

Scott noted the attraction of the mining development for First Nations with young people who need jobs. But she said communities just get “the crumbs” from development. She pointed to an urgent need for infrastructure and other community investment that appears to be held up pending approval of mining development.

In 2021, the Ontario government rejected a call from several First Nations for a moratorium on further exploration and mineral development pending completion of the environmental assessments. 

One community, Neskantaga, launched a court case arguing that legitimate consultation is impossible with a community in crisis. Obstacles included suicides, a decades-long boil water advisory, and the COVID-19 pandemic, which blocked established practices for in-person community decision-making protocols. Meanwhile, the community was deluged with demands for comment on various documents. 

Ashamock said the Ring of Fire is a megaproject, and “if it goes ahead then what’s to stop more and more development?” She called for a “regenerative economy” to address climate change and the need for true sustainability. She also noted that many examples of “renewable energy”, like electric vehicles, aren’t truly renewable. 

Meanwhile, an investigative article last week by The Narwhal suggests the economics and intergovernmental politics of the Ring of Fire may be deteriorating. Ontario has yet to secure a $1-billion commitment from the federal government to help pay for road construction and other infrastructure, and discussions appear to be stalled.

An internal briefing note to Ontario northern development minister Greg Rickford reports an increase in costs, from $1.1 to more than $2 billion. Due to soil conditions, the proposed new all-season roads are inherently challenging and expensive. A 2019 Ontario government estimate pegged construction costs at $2.69 million per kilometre.

The Narwhal says both levels of government, federal and provincial, are also relying on outdated estimates of the value of the mineral deposits, developed 10 years ago, and the possibility that technological developments in car batteries might affect demand for nickel in the coming years.

United States mining consultant Patrick Ryan said the Ring of Fire doesn’t make economic sense. “If it’s such a goddamn good project, why does it depend on massive amounts of government aid?” he asked.



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, Finance & Investment, First Peoples, Jobs & Training, Ontario, Sub-National Governments, Supply Chains & Consumption

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Keith Hirsche
Jobs & Training

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
68
London Eye UK England
Cities & Communities

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
45
Number 10/flickr
International Agencies & Studies

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
54

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1.1k
Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
68
Number 10/flickr

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
54
London Eye UK England

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
45
Konrad Summers/Kern West Oil Museum via Wikimedia Commons

Imperial Oil Backs Lithium Recovery Project in Alberta’s Leduc Oilfield

June 26, 2022
210
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
199

Recent Posts

AJEL / Pixabay

Windfall Tax on Food, Fossil, Pharma Giants Would Raise $490B to Solve ‘Catastrophic’ Food Crisis: Oxfam

June 29, 2022
18
futureatlas.com/flickr

Ottawa Demands Deeper Fuel Emissions Cuts, Offers Fossils a Double-Dip on Tax Breaks

June 29, 2022
25
Province of B.C./flickr

Comox Joins Municipalities Seeking Ban on New Gas Stations

June 29, 2022
15
Danielle Scott/flickr

Advocate Urges Ottawa to Intervene Before Ontario Builds Highway 413

June 29, 2022
26
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
27
/Piqsels

Refocus Agriculture Spending to Cut Emissions, Boost Productivity, OECD Urges Governments

June 29, 2022
9
Next Post
Fionn Guilfoyle / Greenpeace

UK Activists Block Russian Oil Tanker From Docking in Essex

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}