• About
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: 40% of Fossil Fuels Now Under Development Must Stay in the Ground May 17, 2022
Rocky Mountain Glaciers ‘Past Tipping Point’, with Some Expected to Vanish by 2030 May 17, 2022
UK Activists Block Russian Oil Tanker From Docking in Essex May 17, 2022
EXCLUSIVE: Bid to Revive Doomed Nova Scotia LNG Project Collides with Germany’s Net-Zero Plans May 16, 2022
3,800 Residents Ordered to Evacuate after Flooding in Hay River, NWT May 16, 2022
Next
Prev
Opinion & Analysis
Home Climate & Society Energy Politics

With Ontario Facing Record Prices, Ford’s Gas Tax Rollback is No Answer, Analysts Say

May 8, 2022
Reading time: 6 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

With Ontario Facing Record Prices, Ford’s Gas Tax Rollback is No Answer, Analysts Say

Orin Zebest/flickr

1
SHARES
 

Even with gasoline prices hitting record levels, and the high cost of living taking centre stage in Ontario’s provincial election, the Doug Ford government was still moving in the wrong direction last month when it opted to roll back gas taxes last month, analysts say.

The temporary price break of 5.7¢ for gas and 5.3¢ per litre on fuel, conveniently timed for a June 2 vote, was enacted April 14 and is meant to run from July 1 to December 31, 2022. It’s just one part of a multi-billion-dollar spending spree that has the one-time advocate of small government leaning heavily on taxpayers’ money “to get him re-elected to a second term in office, relying on continued deficits to fuel campaign promises,” Global News writes.

The problem with this particular tax break, observers say, is that it will drive up greenhouse gas emissions while doing nothing to address the serious problems in the province’s transportation system.

A Cost of Living Election

A 6.7% inflation rate in March has all the parties in the provincial election focusing on their own versions of affordability in transportation, with Ford’s Conservative party refunding licence plate renewal fees and Liberal leader Steven Del Duca promising to bring transit fares across the province to $1 per ride, The Canadian Press reports.

But those quick fixes won’t make a dent in a period of inflation that is “largely an international phenomenon,” University of Ottawa economist Mario Seccareccia, told the news agency. “These are good gimmicks to get you re-elected,” he said, “but it isn’t the best way of addressing affordability,” or helping lower income earners hit harder by rising prices.

The Globe and Mail focused its criticism more specifically on gas tax reductions, in an early April editorial that cited Ford as “the latest provincial premier to look at the challenge of high oil prices—and see an opportunity to shower voters with money.” The article crossed partisan lines, with the Globe pointing fingers at Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia for subsidizing drivers in response to high fuel costs.

“The problem with these policies? For starters, you have to own a car to get the benefit. In Alberta and Ontario, the more gasoline you use, the bigger your tax break,” the Globe wrote.

“Yes, the recent spike in gas prices has been tough on many Canadians,” the editorial added. “But prices are signals, and the economy works best when people pick up on them. The message oil prices are sending is: You can save money by driving less, or driving more efficiently, or not driving at all.”

That argument only goes so far for households that have no alternative to their daily car commute. But “another way to address the high cost of gas, rather than subsidizing drivers, would be to encourage non-drivers,” the Globe wrote. “Making public transit better, cheaper, and more frequent would cut Canada’s energy bill by reducing energy use rather than subsidizing energy bills.”

Rethinking Car-Dependent Cities

Queens University PhD candidate Joshua McEvoy took that argument a step further in an opinion piece for the Ottawa Citizen, pointing to the personal, social, and health costs of car-dependent cities and the lack of “reliable, convenient, safe, and accessible” alternatives.

“Since the end of the Second World War, we have designed cities to optimize the movement of cars and it is costing us dearly in multiple ways,” he wrote. Even before this year’s price surge, private vehicle ownership cost households C$8,600 to $13,000 per year, more than 21% of the median income in Canada.

“This is all before we factor in the public cost of roads and other car infrastructure, along with the huge costs of low-density, car-dependent housing developments that cost cities similar amounts to service as more dense neighbourhoods but with a fraction of the tax base to pay for it,” he added. “This dynamic is putting increasing pressure on city budgets and constraining their ability to meet climate targets.”

A shift to electric vehicles without changes in city planning won’t address those costs and impacts, he said, nor will it mitigate the “environmental issues associated with the resource extraction and manufacturing required for ever larger and heavier vehicles, electric or otherwise.”

And that’s where the Ford government’s support for a largely unwanted new Highway 413 through the Ontario Greenbelt, its decision to end tolls on Highways 412 and 418, and its determined opposition to one city council’s efforts to block urban sprawl show the provincial Conservatives “finding religion” on one aspect of a wider climate agenda while studiously ignoring the rest.

‘State-Sponsored Climate Arson’

Ontario isn’t the only place where this argument is playing out. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom stood accused of “climate arson” in late March after introducing a US$400 debit card per car owner, or $800 for people with more than one registered vehicle, to help offset high gasoline prices. The total cost of the plan: A cool $11 billion.

Newsom’s office cast the subsidy as a short-term fix.

“I don’t think there’s anyone in government who’s doing more than Governor Newsom on moving beyond oil and the governor is in no way backing down from those commitments,” said spokesperson Erin Mellon. “But at the same time, we have to acknowledge that Californians are struggling, that Putin’s war is driving up prices and not just oil prices.”

But community climate advocates were far from convinced.

“Transit riders get 3 months of free transit but honestly, $400 to subsidize gas guzzlers irrespective of type of car a motorist has and their income?” tweeted California YIMBY policy and data analyst Darrell Owens, who called the plan “regressive, state-sponsored climate arson.”

“Newsom’s proposal, issued in the spirit of helping deal with high gas prices, will worsen greenhouse gas emissions, disproportionately benefit the rich, do nothing to encourage EVs or efficient cars, & encourage more, not less driving,” agreed Pacific Institute co-founder Peter Gleick.

Environment California state director Laura Deehan said the rebate would “help a lot of people right now,” but warned that it was still “just a Band-Aid, and not a very good one. To permanently protect ourselves, we need to double down on the investments that will end our dependence on fossil fuels.”

Back in Ontario, McEvoy laid out a different path in is Ottawa Citizen post.

“We need to make alternative modes more appealing, convenient, and affordable,” and that starts “with governments at all levels investing in public and para transit, active transportation, ending urban sprawl, and following the lead of others in reducing or eliminating fares that limit mobility in our cities,” he wrote.

“Pursuing any of these measures would be a much better, more sustainable, and less regressive use of the $645 million Ford’s tax cut will cost,” he added. And “in doing so, not only will we address the cost of living and make our cities more livable, safer, and healthier places, we will also reduce carbon emissions, better connect people, and make our communities accessible to all.”



in Auto & Alternative Vehicles, Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Cities & Communities, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Ontario, Opinion & Analysis, Sub-National Governments, Transit

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

85,000-Hectare Fort Mac Wildfire Expected to Grow for Days
Drought, Famine & Wildfires

Six Traumatic Years After ‘The Beast’, Fort McMurray Remains Loyal to Big Oil

May 19, 2022
34
‘New New Math’ Means Keeping Even More Fossils in the Ground: McKibben
International Security & War

U.S. Can’t Drill Its Way to Energy Security, Jenkins Warns

May 19, 2022
33
Ontario Contemplates ‘Ultra-Low Carbon’ Super-Agency
Cities & Communities

Ontario’s New Highway 413 Would Boost Emissions, Bake In ‘Auto-Dependent Sprawl’

May 19, 2022
33

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

BREAKING: 40% of Fossil Fuels Now Under Development Must Stay in the Ground

May 18, 2022
408
Mounting Drought Risk Confronts London, Other World Cities

Mounting Drought Risk Confronts London, Other World Cities

May 19, 2022
74
Lack of Consent Drives Indigenous Opposition to Ontario’s Ring of Fire Mining Plan

Lack of Consent Drives Indigenous Opposition to Ontario’s Ring of Fire Mining Plan

May 17, 2022
205
Wildfire

U.S. Utilities Warn of Hazards, Rolling Blackouts as Heat Waves Increase Demand

May 12, 2022
315
Fossils Fret as McKenna Sends Mammoth LNG Project to Cabinet Review

EXCLUSIVE: Bid to Revive Doomed Nova Scotia LNG Project Collides with Germany’s Net-Zero Plans

May 16, 2022
461
Floating Tidal Project Linked to Nova Scotia Grid in Canadian First

Floating Tidal Project Linked to Nova Scotia Grid in Canadian First

May 17, 2022
151

Recent Posts

85,000-Hectare Fort Mac Wildfire Expected to Grow for Days

Six Traumatic Years After ‘The Beast’, Fort McMurray Remains Loyal to Big Oil

May 19, 2022
34
‘New New Math’ Means Keeping Even More Fossils in the Ground: McKibben

U.S. Can’t Drill Its Way to Energy Security, Jenkins Warns

May 19, 2022
33
Ontario Contemplates ‘Ultra-Low Carbon’ Super-Agency

Ontario’s New Highway 413 Would Boost Emissions, Bake In ‘Auto-Dependent Sprawl’

May 19, 2022
33
Newfoundland Offers Suncor $175 Million to Restart Terra Nova Offshore Oilfield

Newfoundland Opens New Round of Offshore Oil Bidding

May 19, 2022
25
Farmers’ Mental Health Strained by Climate-Driven Weather Extremes

Farmers’ Mental Health Strained by Climate-Driven Weather Extremes

May 19, 2022
25
Calgary Company to Supply 180 MWh of Battery Capacity to Alberta Grid

Calgary Company to Supply 180 MWh of Battery Capacity to Alberta Grid

May 19, 2022
30
Next Post
‘Terrifying’ Regulatory Gaps Leave U.S. Unprepared for Massive CO2 Pipeline Expansion, Experts Warn

‘Terrifying’ Regulatory Gaps Leave U.S. Unprepared for Massive CO2 Pipeline Expansion, Experts Warn

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?