• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

‘Deep Entanglements’ Connect Canada’s Biggest Pension Funds with 76 Fossil Companies, New Analysis Concludes

May 6, 2022
Reading time: 5 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Unsplash/Pixabay

Unsplash/Pixabay

49
SHARES
 

The “deep entanglement” between Canada’s 10 biggest pension funds and a roster of 76 fossil fuel companies raises serious questions about whether fund managers and trustees are looking out for the best interest of the beneficiaries who depend on them, according to a scathing, 40-page report released yesterday by Toronto-based Shift Action for Pension Wealth and Climate Health.

The report, based on 2½ months of public records research by Shift Action Senior Manager Patrick DeRochie, identifies 80 pension managers with 124 different roles across the various fossil companies, “raising questions from beneficiaries about fiduciary duty and pension administrators’ potential conflicts of interest on climate-related investment decisions,” the organization writes.

The list includes Lisa Baiton, the former member of the global leadership team at the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) who recently signed on as CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP).

“We just saw that as another symptom of the inappropriate connections between private industry and what is essentially a public institution,” Shift Action Director Adam Scott told The Energy Mix. “For fossil fuel industry investors, it’s in their best interest to delay climate action, mislead the public, and continue to expand and lock in fossil fuel production, but none of those things are in the long-term best interest of pension beneficiaries.”

That collision, in turn, “is the overarching theme in the report,” he added. “These two interests are not aligned, so it makes no sense to have overlapping directors.”

“A pension administrator’s fiduciary duty includes taking decisive action to mitigate climate risk and oversee consequential investment decisions about fossil fuel companies and infrastructure,” agreed Goldblatt Partners LLP Partner Simon Archer, a co-director of the Centre for Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy at Osgoode Hall Law School, in a Shift Action release.

“If a pension administrator simultaneously serves as the corporate director of an oil and gas company, beneficiaries could ask serious questions about whether that conflicts with the duty to invest in their best long-term financial interests.”

The report [pdf] lists nine pension fund directors or trustees who currently hold 13 different positions on the boards of 12 different fossil companies. Another 56 senior staff and investment managers at pension funds occupy 76 corporate director positions with 39 fossils.

“Seven of the 10 pension funds have at least one board member who simultaneously sits on the board of a fossil fuel company,” Shift writes. “In some cases, over a quarter of the pension fund’s board has direct connections to the oil and gas industry.” The list includes:

• The federally-owned Public Sector Pension Investment Board, with 27% of directors currently or previously linked to Husky Energy, MEG Energy, Imperial Oil, or Spectra Energy;

• CPPIB, with 27% of its board holding current or past positions with fossil companies like Fortis, Capital Power, and Emera;

• The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, with two board members connected to Cenovus Energy, ARC Resources, and Calgary-based pipeliner Enbridge Inc.;

• The troubled Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo), which lost C$4 billion in 2020 on bad fossil investments, and has two board members with past or current associations with 13 different fossil companies.

“Even as Canada’s public pension funds move to acknowledge, measure, and manage the growing financial risks of climate change, their progress may be held back by their multi-layered connections to an incumbent fossil fuel industry,” the Shift Action report states. “Fossil fuel companies have a long and well-documented history of active efforts to delay, obstruct, weaken, water down, and resist climate action that could negatively impact their business model. Significant entanglement with fossil fuel interests therefore has the potential to complicate the difficult decision-making required today for Canada’s pension funds to effectively manage climate-related financial risk.”

Scott said the overlapping interests between pension officials and the fossil industry contributes to a “blind spot” that makes it harder for funds to recognize the risks the climate emergency creates for the retirement funds their beneficiaries rely on.

“It does go a long way to help explain why the view of so many financial institutions is so distorted when it comes to climate,” he said. “They really don’t seem to fundamentally understand what solving the climate crisis requires. It’s a lack of literacy about the crisis itself, and that’s just egregious.”

While it may have made sense in the past for pension and other financial sector managers to deeply understand a booming fossil industry, pension directors today “need real expertise in navigating the existential challenges that climate crisis poses for their future,” he added. “That includes literacy on climate change, but also expertise in the global energy transition, because that’s where the opportunities lie. We’re just not seeing nearly enough of that expertise on boards.”

Ten to 15 years ago, “having energy sector directors was considered really good business practice for the pension funds because they were a very profitable sector, and therefore that business acumen was considered of value to the board,” agreed Dr. Janis Sarra, a member of the Canada Climate Law Initiative and professor at the Peter A. Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia. But now, “that’s becoming an increasingly live question. When we need to be attracting directors with real business acumen in transition and effective climate governance, maybe the pragmatic question is whether the business model for selecting the trustees is outdated and needs a rethinking. That’s a really important issue in the interest of pension beneficiaries.”

As long as pension directors do have close associations to the fossil industry, Scott said they must withdraw from decisions on the institutions’ fossil investments. “They should be legally removing themselves from some of those conversations,” he said. “They’re conflicted, so they have to step back.”

Sarra said pension funds have no obligation to disclose whether directors exclude themselves from decisions in which they have a direct interest—but she agreed the fossil-affiliated ones should do exactly that when it comes to their institutions’ oil and gas investments.

“If they’re still financially benefiting from whatever happens in the oil and gas sector, if those current economic interests are still there, then they should be recusing themselves from any discussions, let alone votes,” she said, in order to uphold their duty of loyalty as pension trustees.

Even without a legal duty to disclose, “if I were a pension board and I had a director from the oil and gas sector, I would be telling the beneficiaries that we have this representation, but this is how we deal with it,” she added. “The duty of loyalty is not a new issue, and it’s incredibly important for all pension fiduciaries, but this report reveals that the degree of overlapping interests is much more extensive than perhaps the public and pension plan members knew.”

Scott said it’s hard to give pension plans the benefit of the doubt on transparency when they share so little information about their management of climate-related financial risk. For example, “they say they’re engaging with companies they own about climate but they don’t explain what that means,” he told The Mix. “What are the expectations they have for these companies? How do they evaluate progress, and what happens if a company doesn’t comply with what the engagement is asking? None of that is clear. They’re not setting clear and transparent expectations.”



in Canada, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Community Climate Finance, Finance & Investment, Legal & Regulatory

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

openthegovernment.org
United States

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
262
jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Energy Politics

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
116
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France
Nuclear

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
255

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
499
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
262
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
255
David Wilson/wikimedia commons

U.S. State Treasurers Use Public Office to Thwart Climate Action, Investigation Finds

August 7, 2022
130
Green Energy Futures/flickr

Solar Shingle Buying Guide Lays Out Options for Curious Homeowners

August 7, 2022
119
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.6k

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
116
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Canadians Share Stories of Fear, Vulnerability from 2021 Heat Dome

August 7, 2022
62
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 7, 2022
137
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Pacific Region/Wikimedia Commons

Australia Bans New Coal Mine to Protect Great Barrier Reef, Faces Call for Full Moratorium

August 7, 2022
73
The Come Up Show/flickr

Celebrities, Influencers See Backlash for Private Jet Emissions

August 7, 2022
61
alexxxis/Pixabay

Cambridge University to Rename BP Institute Following Student Backlash

August 7, 2022
47
Next Post
skeeze / Pixabay

Massive New Mexico Wildfire Puts Locals Under ‘Dark Cloud’ of Anxiety, Loss

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}