• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

Alberta Appeal Court Sends Fossil Bankruptcy Back to Review Over Abandoned Well Costs

March 30, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press @CdnPressNews
Primary Author: Bob Weber @row1960

Jasper Morse/Flickr

Jasper Morse/Flickr

1
SHARES
 

A bankruptcy hearing that could determine whether more than C$200 million in oilpatch environmental liabilities wind up on the public dime will have to go back to court.

The Alberta Court of Appeal ruled last Friday that the long-running bankruptcy of Sequoia Resources, which involves cleanup costs for thousands of oil and gas facilities, should return to the province’s Court of Queen’s Bench, The Canadian Press reports. Among other errors, the court said the original judge failed to account for the impact unreclaimed facilities have on the value of an energy company.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

“End-of-life obligations could be loosely thought of as asbestos in the walls of a house,” the Appeal Court justices wrote in their decision. “It will need to be rectified sooner or later, and someone will have to pay for it… until then, however, the house is worth less than a similar asbestos-free house.”

The case began with a 2016 reorganization of Perpetual Energy, a Calgary-based oil and gas company, that saw many money-losing properties with major environmental liabilities transferred to a now-bankrupt associated company, renamed Sequoia Resources.

That transfer came with a small share in a large number of profitable wells. That share remained with Sequoia for a short time before it was quickly transferred to a further associated company called Perpetual Operating Company.

Bankruptcy trustee PricewaterhouseCoopers, which brought the lawsuit against Perpetual, argues Sequoia only held the profitable assets long enough for it to pass regulatory review.

Alberta regulators weigh a company’s assets against its liabilities before approving licence transfers to ensure companies are able to meet their environmental obligations. Under the rules at the time, Sequoia got full credit for the profitable wells despite owning just 1% of them.

After Sequoia transferred the profitable wells back to Perpetual, it owned mostly liabilities. In 2018, Sequoia declared bankruptcy.

At the time, it held licences for 2,300 wells, almost oil and gas 200 facilities, and nearly 700 pipeline segments. It also owned between 700 and 800 wells where production was stopped but the surface hadn’t been restored. Almost two-thirds of Sequoia’s holdings were shut in or abandoned.

Court documents put the cost of cleaning up those facilities at $213 million. The company also owed another $10 million in unpaid property tax.

PricewaterhouseCoopers claims the transaction that allowed Perpetual to get rid of its unprofitable assets was invalid.

Groups including the Orphan Well Association, an industry-funded body that cleans up wells for which no owner can be found, and tar sands/oil sands producer Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. intervened in the action in support of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Perpetual had asked on two occasions for the receivers’ lawsuit to be dismissed and was successful both times. Friday’s decision is the second Appeal Court ruling tossing those earlier decisions out. That puts PricewaterhouseCoopers and Perpetual back in Court of Queen’s Bench.

Drew Yewchuk of the University of Calgary’s Public Interest Law Clinic, who has followed the complicated case, said the rules have changed since Sequoia’s bankruptcy. But the case could still have an important impact.

“One of the more interesting questions that might come up is whether an oil and gas company can structure their affairs to get something past the regulator,” he said. “The Sequoia and Perpetual transfer was structured in a very bizarre manner.”

He called the 1% share Sequoia held in the profitable wells “extremely deceptive.”

Neither PricewaterhouseCoopers nor Perpetual Energy responded to a request for comment on the ruling.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 28, 2022.

Continue Reading



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, CCF Test, Energy Politics, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
4
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
259

Comments 1

  1. Frances Deverell says:
    10 months ago

    I am so glad someone is finally trying to hold the oil companies to account for cleaning up after themselves. They have been collecting profits and leaving the public to pay both their exploration and their cleanup costs for far too long.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
259
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
492
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
247
James Vincent Wardhaugh/flickr

Canada Sidelines Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Approves Separate Mining Project

December 4, 2022
373
Argonne National Laboratory/flickr

$1.5B EV Battery Materials Plant Coming to Eastern Ontario

July 20, 2022
1.4k

Recent Posts

United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
4
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
185
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
84
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
43

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
72
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
493
Next Post
Efficiency Canada

New Model Building Code Shows Steps to Net-Zero Ready Buildings by 2030

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}