• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires May 29, 2023
Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax May 29, 2023
Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing May 29, 2023
UK Traffic Calming Strategy Produces Solid Results, Manufactured Anxiety May 29, 2023
Community Wind Farm Earns Support, Generates Income in German Village May 29, 2023
Next
Prev

83% of Canadians Want Better Forest Protection, More Action from Ottawa

March 30, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press @CdnPressNews
Primary Author: Bob Weber @row1960

Miguel V/Wikimedia Commons

Miguel V/Wikimedia Commons

1
SHARES
 

Canadians of all political stripes and from all regions support greater protection for the country’s forests but are concerned about what that could mean for the economy, according to a new survey.

The survey, commissioned by three environmental groups days before Ottawa released yesterday’s Emissions Reduction Plan, indicates that 83% of Canadians agreed the federal government should do more to protect forests and wildlife, The Canadian Press reports. The support reached 89% in Quebec. On the Prairies, where support was lowest, almost three-quarters of the respondents agreed.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

Two-thirds of Conservatives wanted to see more protections, a number that grew to 91 and 95% among Liberals and New Democrats.

“The breadth of support across regions and political affiliations was a little bit surprising,” said Michael Polanyi, policy and campaign manager at Nature Canada, which commissioned the Ekos poll along with the Natural Resources Defense Council and Nature Québec.

But the same poll found 67% were at least slightly concerned about the economic impact of those protections—a figure that balloons to 86% among Conservatives.

“There’s some concern,” Polanyi acknowledged, although he pointed out that more than a quarter of respondents to that question rated their concern as slight.

The poll, which surveyed 1,036 Canadians between March 11-18, came days before the federal government revealed its Emissions Reduction Pathway, its formal plan to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Polanyi said if those goals are to be met, forestry will need a harder look.

“It has lacked attention.”

While the national greenhouse gas inventory says forestry released 140 megatonnes of carbon dioxide a year, Polanyi said that’s too low. In October, Nature Canada published research suggesting that’s an 80-megatonne underestimate.

Replanting harvested trees doesn’t make the industry carbon-neutral, Polanyi stressed. It takes a decade for a seedling to even start sequestering carbon, while the carbon stored in a mature tree all eventually goes into the atmosphere no matter how it’s used.

For that reason, he said companies burning wood pellets for energy should have to pay the same carbon tax as those burning coal or gas. The poll suggests three-quarters of Canadians agree.

“Canadians want a level playing field.”

Industry spokespeople say carbon releases are fully accounted for through methods developed by federal scientists. Canada’s accounting methods have been adopted by 25 countries and approved by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, they say.

The Forest Products Association of Canada says forest management already mimics natural processes such as fire losses in an attempt to keep ecosystems functioning normally.

Still, the survey suggests strong support for more forest protection.

Almost two-thirds said conserving old-growth is important. Nearly three-quarters said it was important for Canada to lead the world “by protecting its remaining intact boreal forests”—an opinion shared by almost half of Conservative respondents.

Polanyi said the Liberals’ plan to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions must include measures for the forestry sector if it’s going to work. “Coming up with actions to incentivize a lower-carbon logging sector is an opportunity to make sure all sectors are contributing.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 27, 2022



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, CCF Test, Community Climate Finance, Ending Emissions, Forests & Deforestation, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Martin Davis/Facebook
Carbon Levels & Measurement

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 29, 2023
247
Neal Alderson/Twitter
Drought & Wildfires

Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax

May 29, 2023
1.9k
York Region/flickr
Heat & Temperature

Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 29, 2023
146

Comments 1

  1. Rene Ebacher says:
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately, forests management in Canada are mostly the responsibility of provincial governments. As an example, in Quebec, the provincial government announced last year that the province had reach its goal of protecting 17% of its territory. It obtained that result by protecting a vast territory up north where harvesting the forest is prohibited, But even in the so called protected areas in the south part of the province, forests can be harvested for industrial transformation.
    Over the last 12 years, a consensus between the government, municipalities, environmental groups and other citizens groups interested in preserving the environment was reached. It was supposed to create over 80 new protected areas in southern Quebec. It was blocked by the ministry of Natural Ressources, Parks and Recreation without any explanations.
    People were shocked but could do anything about it. The forest lobby has won. Only a small part of the planned protected areas was created which ended up (including the other areas already protected) covering around 4% of the territory in southern Quebec where the forest industry still can operate (the forest industry in Quebec is planning to double their activities in the next 60 years).
    In other parts of the country, we have seen the same kind of battles between the forest industry and people who want to preserve forests and its ecological diversity. In Ontario, and similarly in other parts of the country, the pressure imposed by governments and the industry to open mines in the north looking for those “rare earth” minerals (that will bring us prosperity and enable Canada to be at the “avant-garde” of what they call the “fourth industrial revolution”) will result in more destruction and desolation particularly in the more sensitive boreal forest area.
    People are fighting back, but if we want things to change and preserve our forests, Canadians have to pressure their respective provincial governments to act, or vote for those who are ready to protect our forests against the voracious appetite of the industry.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Neal Alderson/Twitter

Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax

May 29, 2023
1.9k
Martin Davis/Facebook

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 29, 2023
247
York Region/flickr

Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 29, 2023
146
pixabay

Anti-Mob Laws to Prosecute Fossils, Kudos for Calgary, 113M Climate Refugees, Orcas Fight Back, and a Climate Dictionary

May 29, 2023
181

Waste Heat from Quebec Data Centre to Grow 80,000 Tonnes of Veggies Per Year

May 29, 2023
63
Inspiration 4 Photos/flickr

Cooling Upper Atmosphere Has Scientists ‘Very Worried’

May 23, 2023
303

Recent Posts

Jörg Möller/Pixabay

UK Traffic Calming Strategy Produces Solid Results, Manufactured Anxiety

May 29, 2023
49
kpgolfpro/Pixabay

Community Wind Farm Earns Support, Generates Income in German Village

May 29, 2023
44
Pexels/pixabay

Engineers Replace Sand in Concrete with Disposable Diapers

May 29, 2023
22
Sol y Playa condo, Rincón, Puerto Rico

Storms, Sea Level Rise Intensify Conflicts Over Public Beach Access

May 29, 2023
33

U.S. Megadrought Brings Private Water Brokers Into Focus

May 28, 2023
33
FMSC/Flickr

Waive Debt to Unlock Urgently Needed Adaptation Funds, Researchers Urge

May 27, 2023
30
Next Post

Bay du Nord a Bad Investment, Test of Trudeau’s Climate Commitment, Says Advocate

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}