• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Ban Fossil Fuel Ads Like Tobacco Promos, Doctors Urge Ottawa June 10, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Jurisdictions Canada

2030 Climate Plan May Fail Without Faster Emissions Cap, Deeper Cuts for Fossils, Analysts Warn

March 11, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

Department of Energy/Flickr

Department of Energy/Flickr

47
SHARES
 

The Trudeau government may be left with big gaps in its 2030 climate strategy if it delays its oil and gas emissions cap until 2023, or holds off on setting tough carbon reduction targets for the industry, according to news reports this week.

The coverage and analysis have been ramping up with the approach of the March 29 deadline for Environment and Climate Minister Steven Guilbeault to release his long-awaited Emissions Reduction Plan (ERP). Ottawa has promised to deliver a 40 to 45% emissions reduction from 2005 levels by 2030. But that will depend on how quickly and effectively the government drives down carbon pollution from the fossil sector, La Presse and Reuters report.

On Wednesday, Guilbeault said the ERP will include carbon levels by sector, including oil and gas, but the targets will still be subject to change and won’t be binding. He added that details of the fossil emission caps, including the benchmark year, won’t be finalized until 2022 or early 2023, to allow time for consultation with industry, unions, environmental groups, and provincial governments, Reuters reports.

“On the oil and gas cap, there are still a lot of discussions in terms of how do we do it from a structural point of view, what kind of vehicle do we use,” he said. “The ERP will not say how we’ll do the oil and gas cap, because we’re consulting and we don’t know how we will do it.”

The delay had Dale Marshall, national climate program manager at Environmental Defence Canada, contrasting the deliberate pace of Guilbeault’s consultations with the quick access fossils have been getting to government subsidies—including a generous tax credit for carbon capture, utilization and storage technology that is expected to be a hallmark of Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland’s budget in late March or early April.

“When it comes to oil and gas, the federal government keeps showing up with bagfuls of carrots,” Marshall told Reuters. “But a regulatory stick always seems hard to find.’

“That is really unfair Dale and you know it,” Guilbeault tweeted back at Marshall. “We’ve already introduced a number of regulatory measures such as pricing or methane. The oil and gas cap was announced during the campaign and it’s not unreasonable to take a year to develop regs that will affect an entire sector!”

But Marshall wasn’t alone in his concern. “If we don’t do something to address oil and gas, then growth will continue and that would negate any chance of meeting 2030 targets,” said climate scientist Simon Donner, a member of the federal government’s Net-Zero Advisory Body.

La Presse says the Emissions Reduction Plan will call for a 35% reduction from the fossil sector by 2030, well above the 18% the government has expected from the industry so far. “If we don’t ask the oil and gas sector to do more, we won’t achieve a 40% reduction,” said one federal official. “The math doesn’t work.”

But that’s not the only concern about the government’s math. Last fall, the Montreal-based Institut de l’énergie Trottier (Trottier Energy Institute) warned that Canada was only on track to reduce its emissions 16% by 2030. Last week, Academic Director Normand Mousseau warned that a 40 to 45% reduction this decade is already out of reach.

He said a more modest goal of 25 to 35% across the entire economy would still require fossil emission reductions of 30% by 2026 and 60% over the next eight years.

“Canadians must focus on sectors where deep emissions reductions are possible in the shorter term, while initiating changes in other sectors where short-term reductions are more challenging,” wrote Mousseau and IET research associate Simon Langlois-Bertrand. Fossil companies “will have to decarbonize and move the focus to the production of net-zero emission products rather than simply reducing the emission intensity of production” if they want a “long-term economic future”.



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Shale & Fracking, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Jason Woodhead/Flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
288
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay
Petrochemicals & Plastics

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
171
zephylwer0/pixabay
Supply Chains & Consumption

North American Steel, Aluminium Giants Lumber Toward Green Transition

June 24, 2022
147

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
288
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
171
zephylwer0/pixabay

North American Steel, Aluminium Giants Lumber Toward Green Transition

June 24, 2022
147
Nemaska Lithium/Facebook

Critical Minerals, Hydrogen Lead Ottawa’s Low-Carbon Industry Strategy

June 24, 2022
74
/PxFul

Canadian Farmers Offer Ottawa a Roadmap to Cut Agriculture Emissions

June 24, 2022
83
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.5k

Recent Posts

Erik Whalen/wikimedia commons

Yellowstone Park Reopens, But Flood Recovery Could Take Years, Cost Billions

June 24, 2022
60
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

Clean Energy Investment to Exceed $1.4T This Year, Still Falls Short of Climate Goals: IEA

June 24, 2022
80
Cjp24/Wikimedia Commons

UK Green Shift Won’t Repeat Job Destruction of Deindustrialization, Report Finds

June 24, 2022
29
Pavlofox/Pixabay

Millions Face Famine as Climate Disasters, Ukraine War Slash Food Supplies

June 24, 2022
38
Chris Lim/Wikimedia Commons

China Has 9 Times the Wind, Solar Potential It Needs for Carbon Neutrality

June 24, 2022
54
willenhallwench / Pixabay

PG&E Risks Greenwashing with Definition of ‘Scope 4’ Emissions

June 24, 2022
44
Next Post
Timo Newton-Syms/flickr

Breakthrough Technologies Raise Hopes for ‘Wearable Solar’ Within a Decade

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}