After two days of absorbing, parsing, and reading analyses of this week’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report on climate impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, one conclusion shines through: the compendium that UN Secretary General António Guterres calls an “atlas of human suffering” will only matter if countries take action.
In 3,675 pages [pdf] of relentless science and analysis, more than 270 scientists from 67 countries have told citizens and world leaders what we already knew, in more comprehensive detail than ever before: despite growing public demand for faster, deeper carbon cuts, action on the climate emergency by governments, businesses, and institutions is falling far short of what’s needed.
“Our report clearly indicates that places where people live and work may cease to exist, that ecosystems and species that we’ve all grown up with and that are central to our cultures and inform our languages may disappear,” said IPCC Co-Chair Debra Roberts, head of the Sustainable and Resilient City Initiatives Unit in eThekwini Municipality, South Africa.
“So this is really a key moment,” she said. “Our report points out very clearly, this is the decade of action if we are going to turn things around.”
Guterres called the report “an atlas of human suffering and a damning indictment of failed climate leadership,” showing nearly half of humanity “living in the danger zone” and many ecosystems at the point of no return—right now. “With fact upon fact, this report reveals how people and the planet are getting clobbered by climate change.”
Our special report on the IPCC’s impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability report includes these stories:
• ‘Fire Alarm for the Planet’ Demands Action by Rich Countries, IPCC Observers Say
• IPCC Risk Analysis Shows Safe Limits Have Already Been Passed
• ‘Harrowing’ IPCC Report Cites Limits to Climate Adaptation, Stresses Climate Justice
• ‘Crucial’ Adaptation Finance Falls Far Short of What’s Needed
• Half the World Faces Severe Water Shortages if Global Warming Continues
• Richest Nations Won’t Escape Impacts as Global Warming Accelerates
• IPCC Report Fortifies Loss and Damage Language, Raises ‘Issues of Colonization, Marginalization’
• Disrupted Food Systems Imperil Women, Indigenous Peoples, Small Producers
• Climate Drives Health Risk, Threatens Mental Health, IPCC Authors Conclude
• Social, Ecological Infrastructure Can Limit Climate Impacts in Cities
• Nature-Based Solutions Could Help Moderate Land-Water Ecosystem Impacts
• Marine Species, Habitats Suffer from ‘Unprecedented’ Ocean Conditions
A ‘Criminal’ Abdication of Leadership
There’s still a narrow window of time to avert the worst impacts. But the report inventories all the ways in which current climate adaptation funding and practices fall short of what the science demands.
Holding average global temperature rise to 1.5°C “will require the world to cut emissions by 45% by 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050,” Guterres said. “But according to current commitments, global emissions are set to increase almost 14% over the current decade. That spells catastrophe. It will destroy any chance of keeping 1.5 alive.”
Allowing that to happen amounts to a “criminal” abdication of leadership, the UN secretary general said, adding that “the world’s biggest polluters are guilty of arson of our only home”.
Even with prompt, decisive action, many of the effects of climate change are now “unavoidable” over the next 18 years, the working group report says. And “if human-caused global warming isn’t limited to just another couple tenths of a degree, an Earth now struck regularly by deadly heat, fires, floods, and drought in future decades will degrade in 127 ways, with some being ‘potentially irreversible’,” The Associated Press reports.
“Today’s children who may still be alive in the year 2100 are going to experience four times more climate extremes than they do now, even with only a few more tenths of a degree of warming over today’s heat,” AP adds. “If temperatures increase nearly two more degrees Celsius from now (3.4 degrees Fahrenheit), they would feel five times the floods, storms, drought, and heat waves.”
Adaptation Investment Saves Lives
The slightly better news in the report, Guterres said, is that investment in adaptation saves lives. But funders have not yet heeded the call to devote 50% of global climate finance to adaptation, and the adaptation funding on offer after last year’s UN climate summit in Glasgow “is clearly not enough to meet the challenges faced by nations on the front lines of the climate crisis.”
“It is incomprehensible that we knowingly continue to sow the seeds of our own destruction, despite the science and evidence that we are turning our only home into an uninhabitable hell for millions of people,” said Mami Mizutori, UN special representative disaster risk reduction.
“The world also has an opportunity to meet these challenges,” Mizutori added. “The IPCC report points to many solutions on improving regional and local information, providing sound data and knowledge for decision-makers. This does work. Countries have succeeded in saving many lives through improved early warning systems and preparedness.”
But even so, “climate disasters will undoubtedly worsen,” she said. And to date, “there are very low levels of investments in disaster prevention and disaster risk reduction for the world’s most vulnerable countries on the front lines of impacts. We need to ramp up investment in disaster prevention if we are to cope with the exponential rise of disaster events in recent decades.”
Resources
• The IPCC is offering a set of short fact sheets on climate impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, focusing on specific regions of the world, biodiversity, and human settlements, as well as a 74-page atlas [pdf] of global and regional impacts.
• Carbon Brief has an in-depth Q&A on the report, along with collected reactions from 15 of the scientists who contributed to the drafting.
• The World Resources Institute distills “six big findings” from the report, including an infographic showing how climate impacts cascade as average global warming increases from 1.5 to 2.0 to 3.0°C.
• Power Shift Africa summarizes the climate impacts facing seven African countries and the high costs they’ll incur in their attempts to adapt.
• DeSmog reports on the “vested interests” and climate disinformation that have fuelled the crisis.
It is obvious that the 1,5 threshold will NOT BE MET. I would like to see articles on what people should be doing now. Moving to northern latitudes, Leaving shoreline communities. Moving away from fire prone areas etc.
Thanks, Walter. Our usual coverage — when we’re not dissecting and trying to accurately report on 3,675 pages of breaking news — focuses in large part on the things people should be doing, on our own and through our governments and other institutions. Phasing out fossil fuels, decarbonizing energy, and distinguishing between real and greenwashed net-zero options are still the top-line responses.
I’ll suggest to you, though, that the IPCC did a brilliant job of addressing the options you say you want to hear about. The bottom line is that none of them will work. There’s no running away from this. What comes through loud and clear from the IPCC is that, on one hand, we can and must be a lot better and smarter about planning, implementing, and **financing** climate change adaptation, but that we’re already running into the limits of what adaptation can do. Which only underscores something we’ve been hearing and trying to amplify for years — that mitigation is the new adaptation, and nothing else will be sufficient if we don’t drastically scale down fossil fuels and all the other sources of new emissions.
Unfortunately, moving to northern latitudes has massive limitations: In order for the soil to become fertile enough to grow food on the scale required to feed all the climate refugees that will be created, that soil will require many years of first housing micro organisms. Only then will the soil become useful for growing all the food required. But that would take much too long to address the climate problems that are already advancing quickly. To learn more, an online search of “regenerative agriculture” could be informative.
To parse through the 3,675 pages and find what you want– here are five easy steps:
https://twitter.com/wormmaps/status/1498288265794928646
I hope your publication intends on exposing the risk and damage done by animal agriculture to the environment and the threat presents. Part of the change and adaptation that needs to happen is a change in what we eat. We can no longer afford the luxury of eating animal flesh, milk, eggs