• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says July 4, 2022
‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation July 4, 2022
Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History July 4, 2022
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate Impacts & Adaptation International Security & War

Ukraine Invasion Heightens Nuclear Fears at Chornobyl and Beyond

February 27, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Clifford Maynes @CJMaynes

Carl Montgomery/Flickr

Carl Montgomery/Flickr

3
SHARES
 

With the occupation of Ukraine by Russian military forces, observers fear for the safety of the country’s nuclear installations, beginning with the infamous Chornobyl station—shuttered but still radioactive—but also extending to nuclear waste facilities, and operating reactors responsible for over half of the country’s electricity generation.

Speaking at a February 26 webinar hosted by DiaNuke, Russian physicist and activist Andrey Ozharovsky said monitoring reports on February 24 and 25 showed a spike in radiation from the Chornobyl site, 30 times above normal levels.

The continuing status and reason for the spike are unknown, he said. Russia maintains the Chornobyl site was captured peacefully, but other sources indicate fighting occurred. A train carrying Chornobyl employees was blocked en route to the site, Ozharovsky said.

The official statement is that radiation levels have increased due to dust disturbed by Russian tanks. “Maybe. Maybe not,” Ozharovsky said. “I think dust from tanks cannot explain the magnitude of the problem.”

The Energy Intelligence website reported Russian claims that background radiation levels in the area of the nuclear plant are “normal”. The International Atomic Energy Agency said “the readings reported by the regulator—of up to 9.46 microSieverts per hour—are low and remain within the operational range measured in the Exclusion Zone since it was established, and therefore do not pose any danger to the public.” However, Energy Intelligence cited U.S. radiation health specialist Cindy Folkers, who said current levels would convert to an annual exposure of 83 milliSieverts. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)’s recommended limit is 1 mSv per year.

“We have more questions than answers,” Ozharovsky told an audience of about 45 webinar participants. “Who is in charge?” There has been no statement about who is responsible from either the Ukrainian or Russian nuclear agencies, he said.

“We have nuclear plants in a battlefield,” he added, creating the danger of “intentional or unintentional” damage from armaments.

The IAEA, which includes both Russia and Ukraine as members, said it is following the situation in Ukraine. It warned that “any armed attack on and threat against nuclear facilities devoted to peaceful purposes constitutes a violation of the principles of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the Statute of the Agency.”

Ozharovsky said the IAEA has been “passive” and should be asked by its member states to clarify who is responsible for the site, and determine the status and cause of the radiation spike. He said the IAEA could assume stewardship of nuclear facilities in Ukraine and bring in third-party experts to restore confidence that safety is not compromised. The Russian army says the physical integrity of the Chornobyl site has been secured, but has not addressed regulatory or engineering security, he said.

Energy Intelligence says the Russian invasion puts in question plans to transfer spent fuel from the undamaged Chornobyl reactors, and from the country’s 15 operating reactors, to a new storage facility. Planning for the transfer took more than a decade, and removal of the spent fuel from the Chornobyl reactors began just last June. The full transfer was expected to take 10 years to complete.

Meanwhile, the IAEA said Russian missiles hit a radioactive waste disposal site in Kyiv, The Associated Press reported Sunday. Grossi said the agency “expects to soon receive the results of on-site radioactive monitoring,” AP wrote. An electrical transformer at a similar site in Kharkiv was damaged Saturday.

This kind of facility would usually hold low-level radioactive waste from hospitals and industry, AP added. But Grossi pointed to the “very real risk” of “potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment” if the sites are damaged.



in Health & Safety, International Agencies & Studies, International Security & War, Legal & Regulatory, Nuclear, UK & Europe

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Time Running Out, Canada Hanging Back on Emergency Plan to Avert $20B Oil Spill Disaster

July 7, 2022
1
Calgary Climate Hub
Cities & Communities

Calgary Adopts Net-Zero Climate Strategy, Ottawa Endorses Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

July 7, 2022
2
Staplegunther/Wikimedia Commons
UK & Europe

EU Adds Gas, Nuclear to Green Finance Taxonomy, Reversing Earlier Vote

July 7, 2022
2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Wikimedia Commons

BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says

July 4, 2022
135
Keith Weller/Wikimedia Commons

U.S. Methane Plan Gives Big Ag a Free Pass

July 4, 2022
40
opinion polling gender green recovery climate action

Conservative Women Far More Likely Than Men to Support Green Transition, EcoAnalytics Research Finds

July 4, 2022
88
angela n./flickr

‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation

July 4, 2022
126
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
271
Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

July 3, 2022
480

Recent Posts

United Nations

Time Running Out, Canada Hanging Back on Emergency Plan to Avert $20B Oil Spill Disaster

July 7, 2022
1
Calgary Climate Hub

Calgary Adopts Net-Zero Climate Strategy, Ottawa Endorses Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

July 7, 2022
2
Staplegunther/Wikimedia Commons

EU Adds Gas, Nuclear to Green Finance Taxonomy, Reversing Earlier Vote

July 7, 2022
2
Andrea Schaffer/wikimedia commons

Australia’s New Government Plans Legislated Emissions Cut, EV Incentives

July 7, 2022
1
NatureServe/Flickr

Nature Restoration Without Fossil Phaseout ‘Only Marginally’ Reduces Global Warming

July 7, 2022
1
skeeze / Pixabay

U.S. Looks to Other Options After Supreme Court Undercuts EPA Carbon Rules

July 7, 2022
1
Next Post
Hargi23/wikimedia commons

Analysis: Fossil Fuel Demand Funds Ukraine War as Putin Grabs for Influence

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}