• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark October 3, 2023
Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution October 2, 2023
Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback October 2, 2023
Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds October 2, 2023
UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit October 2, 2023
Next
Prev

FERC Introduces Tougher Impact Assessments, New Climate Rules for Gas Infrastructure

February 20, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes

Glen Dillon/Wikipedia

Glen Dillon/Wikipedia

 

The U.S. regulator responsible for natural gas infrastructure is taking a closer look at whether new projects are needed and how they affect people and the environment, and floating new policy to address the climate impact of fossil gas development.

The action by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “was partly in response to court decisions that overturned some of the agency’s approvals of gas projects for failing to adequately consider GHG emissions, whether the project was needed, and potential effects on environmental justice communities,” Utility Dive reports, citing a statement last week by FERC Chair Richard Glick.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

“My hope is that these policy statements will provide project developers, consumers, landowners and residents of impacted communities, and the commission itself with a more legally durable path forward that will provide greater certainty for everyone,” Glick said during the commission’s monthly meeting. Later, he told media the changes would help FERC decisions withstand subsequent court challenges and speed up the regulatory process for all concerned. With the commission “providing a more legally durable precedent,” he said, developers and other stakeholders “are not going to be playing Russian roulette every time you go to court with a particular opinion because the commission ignored what the D.C. Circuit [Court of Appeals] had to say.”

In the past, FERC’s assessment of the need for new gas pipelines was based solely on whether the developers had contracts in place with producers, Utility Dive explains. “The agency will now consider other factors such as demand projections, estimated capacity utilization rates, potential cost savings to customers, and statements from state regulatory commissions or local distribution companies,” the industry newsletter adds, citing commission staff.

“FERC will also consider how gas infrastructure could affect the applicant’s existing customers; the interests of existing pipelines and their customers; environmental interests; and, the interests of landowners and surrounding communities.”

That assessment will include any “reasonably foreseeable” greenhouse gas emissions with a “close causal relationship” to a project, with emissions above 100,000 U.S. tons per year triggering more rigorous environmental review, Utility Dive says.

FERC Commissioner Allison Clements said the commission has given some consideration to gas projects’ environmental impacts in the past. But now, “the policy makes clear that impacts on the environment, landowners, and environmental justice communities should be considered alongside economic factors in the public interest determination, and not be relegated to an afterthought,” she said. “The climate change effects of a project are one more, if uniquely harmful, adverse impact that the commission must consider in balancing a project’s benefits against its drawbacks.”

Utility Dive captures the debate back and forth among FERC commissioners, along with immediate pushback from senior members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

“The commission went too far by prioritizing a political agenda over their main mission—ensuring our nation’s energy reliability and security,” said committee chair Joe Manchin (D-WV). Ranking member John Barrasso (R-WY) said the ruling would make it “nearly impossible for Americans to maintain or improve access to abundant and affordable supplies of natural gas”.

Trump-appointed former FERC chair Neil Chatterjee claimed the new policy would have “no value”, since it was approved on a split vote of 3-2.

“Neither statement provides any certainty,” Chatterjee tweeted. “There is no guidance on balancing the factors. No guidance on mitigation. The 100,000 metric tons threshold is arbitrary. The fact that it will apply to pending applications is unfair and legally dubious. This will chill investment and ultimately hurt consumers.”

Continue Reading



in Community Climate Finance, Heat & Power, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Shale & Fracking, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Tar Sands / Oil Sands

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark

October 3, 2023
147
Dawn Ellner/flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
62
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia
Finance & Investment

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
142

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark

October 3, 2023
147
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
142
Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
359
YouTube

UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit

October 3, 2023
75
Solarimo/pixabay

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

October 2, 2023
261
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
880

Recent Posts

Dawn Ellner/flickr

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
62
Northvolt plant in Sweden, Spisen/wikimedia commons

Quebec Lands $7B Battery Gigafactory Investment from Sweden’s Northvolt

October 2, 2023
62
GFDL/Wikimedia Commons

Clean Energy Funding Isn’t Just About Money, Policy Expert Warns

October 2, 2023
39
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wikimedia Commons

Climate Change Brings Rapid Ice Loss to Antarctica, Arctic, Swiss Glaciers

October 2, 2023
58
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 28, 2023
221
DiscoverEganville/wikimedia commons

EV Rentals to Improve Transportation Access for Ontario Townships

September 28, 2023
82
Next Post
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Alberta To Toughen Emissions Standards For Big Tar Sands/Oil Sands Polluters

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}