• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA June 4, 2023
Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest June 4, 2023
Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing June 4, 2023
2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season June 4, 2023
Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion? June 1, 2023
Next
Prev

Trans Mountain Cost Pushes Past $17B, Completion Delayed to 2023

February 4, 2022
Reading time: 3 minutes

Lenny K Photography/Flickr

Lenny K Photography/Flickr

2
SHARES
 

The price tag for the federally-owned Trans Mountain pipeline expansion has ballooned to more than $17 billion, en route to a final cost that could hit $20 billion, and project completion has been delayed to 2023 or 2024, according to a new analysis published late Thursday.

“Ottawa purchased the pipeline almost four years ago from Kinder Morgan Canada for C$4.4 billion after it appeared the private owners were set to walk away from the expansion as it faced a series of hurdles to be built by late 2020,” recalls Calgary Herald columnist Chris Varcoe, writing in the National Post. “At the time, the project’s price tag was pegged at $7.4 billion, but soon moved higher. It climbed to $12.6 billion in early 2020 and is headed up again.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Even before this latest cost overrun, campaigners at Coast Protectors were petitioning the federal government to cut its losses on the project.

“Trans Mountain recently admitted the cost of construction will be significantly higher, yet it refuses to say how much more the new pipeline will cost Canadian taxpayers beyond the last updated price of $12.6 billion—updated two years ago, before a global pandemic,” the petition site states. “Trans Mountain also refuses to update its construction timeline, though it is clear from sworn legal documents and Trans Mountain’s own construction reports that the pipeline cannot be built on time. More delays mean more costs to Canadians.”

Varcoe’s unnamed sources blame the cost increase on construction interruptions due to severe weather and the COVID-19 pandemic, and they stress the numbers aren’t official. “At the end of the day, it all needs to be approved by the government before it’s a real number, so who knows how it might tweak around,” said one insider.

Coast Protectors also cites “shoddy work by contractors” and environmental violations as factors that have slowed down the project.

Officials with the federal government and Crown-owned Trans Mountain Corporation had no comment on the National Post report. “At this time, we have no update to the cost or overall schedule of the project,” TMX told Varcoe in a statement.

Hal Kvisle, a fossil legend and former pipeline CEO who now sits on the boards of two Canadian oil producers, said the cost overrun will ultimately translate into higher charges for fossil companies that use the pipeline to transport their product. “I don’t know that the [construction] costs will exceed $20 billion, but it will be heading up towards that,” he said. “And most people now are thinking it will be done by the end of 2023, or maybe a little bit into 2024.”

But a lineup of fossil executives told Varcoe they were neither surprised nor concerned about the cost overrun. Chris Bloomer, former CEO of the now-defunct Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, said the cost hike shouldn’t make it harder for the Trudeau government to sell off the pipeline.

“It will attract a lot of interest,” he said. “This is a situation where costs have gone up, but the shippers are still committed.”



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, Community Climate Finance, Energy Subsidies, Health & Safety, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Pixabay
Solar

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
136
Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr
Cities & Communities

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 5, 2023
90
Natural Resources Canada
Drought & Wildfires

2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season

June 4, 2023
174

Comments 2

  1. ron wilton says:
    1 year ago

    I would like to know what we are paying in monthly interest charges on the cost of borrowing and building this misguided pipeline purchase, and how much money we are getting monthly from the current line.
    I would also like to know if the former finance minister, Bill Morneau, who was instrumental in the purchase of this pipeline derived any benefits from his involvement.
    I would also like to know why the government retained former Enron/Kinder Morgan executive, Ian Anderson to be CEO of TML.
    I realize that our PM Trudeau is easily influenced by corporate control, as evidenced by the SNC Lavalin /Jody Wilson Raybould affair but what else would motivate him to accept such a purchase without H of C discussion.

    Reply
  2. Judy Doerr says:
    1 year ago

    The biggest mistake for JT….and the reason I cannot vote for him ever again….and did not in the last election 4.5BILLION ON A PIPELIBE in a declared climate change crisis……hugh double standard. HE MUST STOP PROPPING UP THE OIL AND GAS CORPORATIONS…..really foolish political move. HOWEVER HE REMAINS BETTER THAN THE CONSERVATIVES who would have that pipeline up and running. IT appears NDP might have been the better choice.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
14.7k
sunrise windmill

Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA

June 5, 2023
156
Natural Resources Canada

2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season

June 4, 2023
174
Pixabay

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
136
debannja/Pixabay

Austin, Texas Council Committee Backs Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 4, 2023
93
Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 5, 2023
90

Recent Posts

Clairewych/Pixabay

Demand Surges for Giant Heat Pumps as Europe Turns to District Heating

June 4, 2023
98
nicolasdebraypointcom/pixabay

Factor Gender into Transportation Planning, IISD Analyst Urges Policy-Makers

June 4, 2023
40
moerschy / Pixabay

Federal Climate Plans Must Embrace Community-Driven Resilience

June 4, 2023
57
Equinor

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
884
Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
79
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Notley

Notley Would Have Backed Carbon Capture Subsidies, Smith Less Certain: Ex-Pipeline Exec

June 1, 2023
102
Next Post
Karsten Würth (@inf1783)/wikimedia commons

Canadians See Future Economy Built on Clean Energy, Not Fossils, National Survey Finds

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}