• About
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: 40% of Fossil Fuels Now Under Development Must Stay in the Ground May 17, 2022
Rocky Mountain Glaciers ‘Past Tipping Point’, with Some Expected to Vanish by 2030 May 17, 2022
UK Activists Block Russian Oil Tanker From Docking in Essex May 17, 2022
EXCLUSIVE: Bid to Revive Doomed Nova Scotia LNG Project Collides with Germany’s Net-Zero Plans May 16, 2022
3,800 Residents Ordered to Evacuate after Flooding in Hay River, NWT May 16, 2022
Next
Prev
Opinion & Analysis
Home Climate & Society Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

January 26, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Full Story: Green Economy Law
Primary Author: Marc Z. Goldgrub

Ontario Creates ‘Innovation Wasteland’ with Latest Renewables Rollback, Critic Warns

Bruce Reeve/Flickr

16
SHARES
 

“We’re fighting the carbon tax because it hurts seniors, workers, families, and small businesses,” Ontario Premier Doug Ford tweeted in 2019. Which makes it all the more interesting that Ford’s government instituted a new Ontario “carbon tax” this year, and it looks a lot like what he campaigned against, writes green economy lawyer Marc Goldgrub.

Ford’s “tax” takes the form of the Emission Performance Standards (EPS) program. On January 1, it replaced a similar program operated by the federal government called the Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS), one of the federal carbon pricing backstop program’s two components—the other being the fuel charge.

Both the OBPS and EPS are cap and trade-style programs for large industrial facilities. More forgiving than the fuel charge, the programs are meant to ease the regulatory burden carbon pricing imposes on industry. The programs work by placing a permitted limit, or “cap”, on facilities’ annual emissions. If a facility emits more than the cap, it can buy allowances from facilities emitting under their cap (that can profit by the sale), or pay the government per excess tonne of carbon at the applicable rate.

Under the EPS, when facilities pay the excess emission charge to the government, that revenue goes to a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account used to support Ontario industries in reducing emissions. And that’s also how much of the cap and trade revenue was allocated by Ontario’s previous government, led by Kathleen Wynne.

Facilities forced to spend on lowering emissions or paying for them will likely pass those costs on to consumers. In this way, an industrial carbon price ultimately serves as an effective consumer carbon tax. Admittedly, Ford was stuck with carbon pricing of some kind in Ontario following the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in favour of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act’s constitutionality. But if Ford hates carbon pricing so much because of the extra costs passed to consumers, he could have made Ontario’s program revenue neutral.

The federal law allows provinces to price carbon however they want as long as a program meets or exceeds federal standards. And provinces can make whatever use they want of the proceeds.

Ford’s government could have come up with its own fuel charge in addition to its industrial program, and ensured that citizens’ entire cost burden associated with carbon pricing was simply returned or offset. Tax breaks or credits, like those given in British Columbia’s program, were one option. Direct payments, like the federal Climate Action Incentive payments Ontario residents receive annually (soon quarterly), were another. They could even have copied Washington State’s (ultimately unsuccessful) 2016 proposal and reduced sales taxes.

Ford’s government, of course, did not make their carbon pricing program revenue neutral.

Furthermore, because the federal program returns all collected funds back to the provinces, and primarily serves to proscribe preferred corporate behaviour, the federal carbon price is not and never was a tax. Rather, it is a “regulatory charge”, as court after court reiterated in the various multi-million dollar lawsuits Ford launched or invited during his futile anti-carbon pricing crusade. Conversely, since Ford’s program will give the province a new source of revenue it can spend with considerable leeway, it looks a lot more like a carbon tax than what Justin Trudeau’s government passed.

Ford’s government had various options by which it could have ensured Ontario’s carbon pricing program did not impose new costs for Ontarians and did not function as a carbon tax. But after attacking Ontario Liberals for their “carbon tax” in 2018, and federal Liberals for their “carbon tax” in 2019, Ford quietly decided that in 2022, he actually wouldn’t mind his own.

Marc Z. Goldgrub is a lawyer at the Toronto-based Green Economy Law Professional Corporation: a corporate, commercial, and environmental law firm for the new green economy. Republished with permission. You can subscribe to Marc Goldgrub’s green economy newsletter here.



in Canada, Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Energy Politics, Legal & Regulatory, Ontario, Opinion & Analysis, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Mounting Drought Risk Confronts London, Other World Cities
Drought, Famine & Wildfires

Mounting Drought Risk Confronts London, Other World Cities

May 19, 2022
74
85,000-Hectare Fort Mac Wildfire Expected to Grow for Days
Drought, Famine & Wildfires

Six Traumatic Years After ‘The Beast’, Fort McMurray Remains Loyal to Big Oil

May 19, 2022
34
‘New New Math’ Means Keeping Even More Fossils in the Ground: McKibben
International Security & War

U.S. Can’t Drill Its Way to Energy Security, Jenkins Warns

May 19, 2022
33

Comments 1

  1. Boyd Reimer says:
    3 months ago

    In Nov, 2021, Ford promised to cut gas pump prices by 5.7 cents by the next budget. Am I missing something or is that a contradiction? I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a contradiction. See link: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-vehicle-licence-renewal-1.6359951

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

BREAKING: 40% of Fossil Fuels Now Under Development Must Stay in the Ground

May 18, 2022
408
Mounting Drought Risk Confronts London, Other World Cities

Mounting Drought Risk Confronts London, Other World Cities

May 19, 2022
74
Lack of Consent Drives Indigenous Opposition to Ontario’s Ring of Fire Mining Plan

Lack of Consent Drives Indigenous Opposition to Ontario’s Ring of Fire Mining Plan

May 17, 2022
205
Wildfire

U.S. Utilities Warn of Hazards, Rolling Blackouts as Heat Waves Increase Demand

May 12, 2022
315
Fossils Fret as McKenna Sends Mammoth LNG Project to Cabinet Review

EXCLUSIVE: Bid to Revive Doomed Nova Scotia LNG Project Collides with Germany’s Net-Zero Plans

May 16, 2022
461
Floating Tidal Project Linked to Nova Scotia Grid in Canadian First

Floating Tidal Project Linked to Nova Scotia Grid in Canadian First

May 17, 2022
151

Recent Posts

85,000-Hectare Fort Mac Wildfire Expected to Grow for Days

Six Traumatic Years After ‘The Beast’, Fort McMurray Remains Loyal to Big Oil

May 19, 2022
34
‘New New Math’ Means Keeping Even More Fossils in the Ground: McKibben

U.S. Can’t Drill Its Way to Energy Security, Jenkins Warns

May 19, 2022
33
Ontario Contemplates ‘Ultra-Low Carbon’ Super-Agency

Ontario’s New Highway 413 Would Boost Emissions, Bake In ‘Auto-Dependent Sprawl’

May 19, 2022
33
Newfoundland Offers Suncor $175 Million to Restart Terra Nova Offshore Oilfield

Newfoundland Opens New Round of Offshore Oil Bidding

May 19, 2022
25
Farmers’ Mental Health Strained by Climate-Driven Weather Extremes

Farmers’ Mental Health Strained by Climate-Driven Weather Extremes

May 19, 2022
25
Calgary Company to Supply 180 MWh of Battery Capacity to Alberta Grid

Calgary Company to Supply 180 MWh of Battery Capacity to Alberta Grid

May 19, 2022
30
Next Post
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A1_Houston_Office_Oil_Traders_on_Monday.jpg

Investment Firms Need Skills Development for ESG, 2/3 of Finance Professionals Say

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?