• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Demand & Distribution Petrochemicals & Plastics

U.S. Pours Millions into ‘False’ Plastics Solutions, Advocates Say

January 18, 2022
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by Gaye Taylor

Charly_777/pixabay

Charly_777/pixabay

8
SHARES
 

The U.S. Department of Energy’s recent pledge to invest millions in research projects touted as making plastics production more environmentally friendly will only further entrench a planet-wrecking and profoundly unjust status quo, say environmental groups.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) says its recent US$13.4 million earmarked for research funding will address environmental problems while simultaneously creating an “influx of clean manufacturing jobs for American workers.” But green advocates aren’t convinced, Grist reports.

“What this funding does is perpetuate our reliance on single-use plastic,” said Beyond Plastics founder Judith Enck, a former regional administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency. That’s not good for the environment, it’s not good for health, and it’s not good for environmental justice.”

The DOE grants will focus on projects it says will make plastics more environmentally friendly, rather than those seeking to replace plastic altogether. These are “false solutions,” Enck said, that do little to reduce the volume of plastic waste entering oceans each year. Furthermore, the majority of the seven projects now lined up for funding are far from planet-friendly since they involve some form of chemical recycling, a toxic and extremely energy-intensive process of converting old plastic into new that has yet to live up to billing. (Canadian fossil interests tried to secure government funds for a similar approach called “advanced recycling”.)

Citing a 2020 analysis by the non-profit Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), Grist writes that “of the 37 chemical recycling facilities proposed in the U.S. since 2000, only three are operational, and zero specialize in plastic-to-plastic conversion.”

That is, the three that are operational do not recycle plastic at all. Rather, they convert plastic back into fossil fuels, which are then sold for combustion.

Industry claims that closed-loop recycling systems for plastics require only a bit of tweaking to become reality are “disingenuous,” GAIA Policy and Research Coordinator Tok Oyewole told Grist, adding that DOE funds would be much better spent on projects that aim to reduce plastic production in the first place. 

Kim Warner, a senior scientist for the non-profit Oceana, said some of the DOE funding should be funnelled towards efforts to reduce harmful chemicals in essential plastics, like those used in medical equipment and aircraft.

Other recent news reports illustrate how pro-plastic policy like the DOE funding plan puts public health and environmental justice at stake. On December 6, a ground-level flaring event was set off at the Exxon SABIC plastics plant northeast of Corpus Christi, Texas to burn off leftover gas. Described by the company as “similar to a giant barbecue”—and as something closer to “Dante’s Inferno” by a witness—the flaring lit up the sky and was visible for miles, reports DeSmog Blog. “Massive, smelly flames” rose above the flare’s protective walls, leaving locals concerned about residential exposure to carcinogens like benzene and vinyl chloride.

“The people in the area are going to be guinea pigs. It’s a sacrifice zone,” Neil Carman, clean air director at the Lone Star Chapter of the U.S. Sierra Club, told the Rolling Stone last May. He said residents will be exposed to a “toxic soup of carcinogens, mutagens that change the DNA, teratogens that cause birth defects, and many, many other health effects.”

Industry maintains that flaring excess hydrocarbons is better than just letting them leak to the atmosphere. But that does not mean that plants like Exxon SABIC, poised to become the world’s largest ethane cracker plant, operate emissions-free.

DeSmog says the plant’s air quality permit allows it to emit about 2.7 million tonnes of carbon dioxide each year. Citing a 2018 report by the Environmental Integrity Project, DeSmog adds that similar allowances granted to the 31 fossil and petrochemical plants then on the books would mean another 45 million tonnes of CO2 legally released into the atmosphere per year, “the equivalent of 11 new coal-fired power plants.” 

Some in the local community welcome the some “$50+ billion in economic gains” promised Gulf Coast Growth Venture, the consortium spearheading the cracker plant. But Elida Castillo, whose mother died from respiratory failure linked to long-term exposure to air pollution, said people don’t really grasp what they’re signing up for. 

Along with increasingly poisonous air and risk of massive industrial accidents, courtesy of monster hurricanes like Harvey in 2017 and Ida in 2021, the drought-prone region will have to contend with Exxon-SABIC’s ravenous thirst for water. Citing the Rolling Stone report, DeSmog says the Exxon-SABIC plant will consume 20 million gallons of fresh water every day.



in Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Community Climate Finance, Energy Politics, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Petrochemicals & Plastics, Water

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David/flickr
United States

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
580
pxhere
Environmental Justice

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
138
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
116

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
580
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
116
Konrad Summers/Kern West Oil Museum via Wikimedia Commons

Imperial Oil Backs Lithium Recovery Project in Alberta’s Leduc Oilfield

June 26, 2022
97
pxhere

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
138
stockvault

Animal Agriculture Could Reduce Future Pandemic Risk, UK Researchers Say

June 26, 2022
73
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
67

Recent Posts

Adam E. Moreira/wikimedia commons

Suspend Transit Fares, Not Gas Tax, Climate Advocates Urge Biden

June 26, 2022
55
moerschy / Pixabay

Pandemic Drives Up Support for Climate Action, Pessimism About Elected Leaders

June 26, 2022
27
hellomike/flickr

No Public Input as Canada Finalizes Climate Plan for Airlines

June 27, 2022
37
Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Southeast Asia/wikimedia commons

Japan, Korea Sell Vietnam on Gas Amid Crackdown on Climate Activists

June 26, 2022
22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Barrow_Offshore_Wind_Farm

Global Offshore Wind Pipeline Doubles to 846 Gigawatts

June 26, 2022
38
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

U.S. Renewables Industries Scramble to Reuse, Recycle Before Waste Volumes Skyrocket

June 26, 2022
63
Next Post
hiimniko/Flickr

Forest Protection Delivers Better Climate Gains than Tree Planting, Researchers Find

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}