• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration March 19, 2023
Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe March 17, 2023
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
Next
Prev

NDP MP Hits, Singh Misses on Call for Trans Mountain Shutdown

November 28, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes

OFL Communications Department/Flickr

OFL Communications Department/Flickr

7
SHARES
 

This story has been updated to better reflect the location of MP Peter Julian’s riding

As the federally-owned Trans Mountain works to reopen its pipeline to British Columbia’s Lower Mainland, an NDP Member of Parliament is planning a private member’s bill calling for the controversial expansion of the pipeline to be cancelled immediately on climate and climate justice grounds. But he doesn’t have the endorsement of party leader and Burnaby South MP Jagmeet Singh.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

NDP House Leader and veteran MP Peter Julian, whose riding sits all too close to the pipeline’s current terminals on Burrard Inlet and will bear much of the brunt of the expansion project, has given notice to the House of Commons “that he intends to table a motion that calls on the government to ‘immediately stop’ construction of the Trans Mountain expansion,” reports the Toronto Star.

The motion casts shade on the idea that future demand for oil will justify increasing the capacity of the existing pipeline and terminals, adding that the project “undermines” Canada’s climate commitments. Instead, it proposes reinvesting the estimated $12.7 billion it will cost to complete the Trans Mountain expansion in a Green New Deal for Canada.

In an interview with the Star, Julian stressed that the motion is intended to express both his personal views and those of many of his constituents, and that he still supports his party’s more restrained messaging on the project—opposing it on principle, while not agitating for its cancellation.

Once vocal in his opposition to the Trans Mountain expansion project, NDP leader Singh has taken a more muted line on the subject as he attempts to deliver on a party position which “seeks to champion workers in all sectors of the economy while also pushing for stronger action on climate change,” writes the Star.

It has been a delicate dance for Singh, the paper adds, noting that his initial, full-throated opposition to the expansion project “soured relations” with his provincial counterpart Rachel Notley when she was seeking re-election as Alberta premier in 2019.

Clarifying his position on the project during this year’s federal election, Singh said that while he remains personally opposed to expanding the pipeline, a federal NDP government would not scrap it without thorough analysis. Responding to news of Julian’s motion, Singh said his position will not change.

As Julian moves to table his motion, Trans Mountain crews are working to reopen the existing pipeline after it was closed as a precautionary measure on November 14, in the wake of the atmospheric river that delivered unprecedented flooding to the Lower Mainland.

The Narwhal writes that floodwaters from the Coldwater River in central B.C. have left sections of the pipeline either exposed or underwater. While the unsettling situation has not triggered any oil leaks yet, it has “raised questions about the ability of the project to withstand extreme weather events.” 

Examining photos of the exposed pipeline, Don Deaver, a Texas-based engineer who consults on pipeline operations and maintenance, told The Narwhal that pipelines need to remain buried, for stability and to protect them from falling rocks and trees.

After a brief overview of Trans Mountain’s less-than-stellar care for the ecosystems through which its pipeline infrastructure passes, The Narwhal says the company declined to comment on “whether it would consider route changes or changes to its current plans for the expansion of the pipeline, in light of the impacts from the floods.”



in Canada, Community Climate Finance, Energy Politics, Health & Safety, Jobs & Training, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments, Water

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

BREAKING: Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 20, 2023
273
EcoFlight
First Peoples

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
359
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr
Oil & Gas

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
110

Comments 2

  1. David Huntley (Professor Emeritus, physics, SFU) says:
    1 year ago

    The Westridge Marine Terminal on Burrard Inlet is not in Peter Julian’s electoral district as stated. It is in the Burnaby North-Seymour electoral district.

    Trans Mountain claims the new pipeline will be in service in December 2022. I see no prospect of that happening. The tunnel through Mount Burnaby is scheduled to be finished in June 2022, then the three pipes have to installed for which nine months is anticipated; then there is cathodic protection, which is not trivial, and backfilling the tunnel. Everything is taking longer than planned, and if I had to bet, I would place the in service date in 2024.
    Read the West Coast Environmental Law review of the topic to get a different analysis, but similar conclusion.

    The government appears to be determined to complete the new pipeline despite all arguments about its likely future use and costs. We need a contest to imagine future uses for it. How about sending the excess rainwater from the coast to the prairie provinces which will no longer have Saskatchewan River water when all the glaciers in the Rocky Mountains have disappeared. Storage will be needed.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the correction on Julian’s riding, David. I’m updating the story…right now.

      I love your contest idea! We must have rewards for our contestants. First prize: One free subscription to The Energy Mix. Second prize: Two free subscriptions!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

BREAKING: Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 20, 2023
273
@davenewworld_2

Keystone Pipeline Safety Worries Lawmakers after TC Energy Ordered to Reduce Operating Pressure

March 19, 2023
126
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
110
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
359
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
545
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
262

Recent Posts

Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
20
Wikipedia

Fossil Funding Makes Indigenous Resource Network a ‘Propaganda Machine’, Opponent Says

March 19, 2023
29
moerschy / Pixabay

Planetary Weight Study Shows Humans Taking Most of Earth’s Resources

March 19, 2023
12
Environmental Defence Canada/flickr

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 18, 2023
286
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
142
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
152
Next Post

‘$22-Trillion Time Bomb’ Ahead Unless Banks Drop High-Carbon Investments, Moody’s Warns

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}