• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows February 7, 2023
AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports February 7, 2023
February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America February 7, 2023
Solar Geoengineering Banned in Mexico After ‘Rogue’ Stunt February 7, 2023
Lithium Mine Divides Nemaska Cree Over Impacts, Benefits February 7, 2023
Next
Prev

EXCLUSIVE: Fertilizer Lobby ‘Trying to Scare Farmers’ to Head Off Reductions in Climate Super-Pollutant

October 19, 2021
Reading time: 5 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

/Pxfuel

/Pxfuel

4
SHARES
 

A thinly-researched report that takes aim at federal controls on nitrous oxide, a climate super-pollutant 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide, is being written off as a “deliberately misleading” attempt by the Canadian fertilizer lobby to scare and anger farmers, The Energy Mix has learned, in a joint reporting effort with Quebec Farmers’ Advocate.

The 17-page economic analysis, released September 27 by Fertilizer Canada, concludes that reduced fertilizer use could cost Canadian farmers C$48 billion over the next eight years. It’s the latest round in the trade association’s pushback on the Trudeau government’s 2020 climate plan, A Healthy Environment and a Healthy Economy, which includes a call for a 30% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizer use by 2030.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

“Direct emissions associated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizer application have increased by approximately 60% since 2005 and these emissions are projected to keep increasing,” the federal climate plan states [pdf, p. 45]. “Improving how fertilizers are used through better products and practices will save farmers money and time, and help protect Canada’s land and water.”

Fertilizer Canada says [pdf] farmers are using less fertilizer per crop due to a 34% productivity increase in the last 16 years, but acknowledges that “overall fertilizer consumption in Canada has increased over the past two decades”. In its synopsis of the new report, the association warns that if Ottawa sets sights on a 30% emissions cut based on 20% less fertilizer use, “the potential economic impact of reduced fertilizer use would be devastating to Canadian farmers.”

But one of the key groups behind the successful lobby for the government’s $200-million On-Farm Climate Action Fund says the report fails to reflect farmers’ actual experience with fertilizer use, or the potential to use it more efficiently.

“To be completely honest, I think this is a deliberately misleading report,” Farmers for Climate Solutions Interim Director Brent Preston said of the assessment by the Winnipeg office of MNP, a Calgary-based accountancy and business advisory firm with more than 100 offices across the country.

“They’re assuming that if you cut nitrogen fertilizer use, you’re going to have a direct, linear, corresponding drop in output in yield, and none of the research indicates that would be the case,” Preston said. “The research in Canada is very clear that on average, farmers tend to over-apply nitrogen, and you can significantly reduce nitrogen use with either zero or very small impact on yield.”

Given the gap between that potential and the arc of the MNP report, “I don’t know what Fertilizer Canada is trying to do,” he added. “It appears to me that they’re trying to get farmers angry and to scare farmers, and to me that’s not a basis for good public policy.” 

A rapid, 30% reduction in fertilizer emissions will be challenging, he said, “but suggesting that we’re just going to cut use and accept a massive drop in yield is insulting to farmers.”

The opening pages of the consulting report set the stage for what follows. The executive summary says Fertilizer Canada hired MNP “to analyze the direct macro financial impact of lost production” due to reduced fertilizer use through 2030, while the introduction refers to a “worst-case scenario” of a 20% cut beginning in 2023. 

As opposed to assessing whether fertilizer reductions would risk farmers’ livelihoods or exports, “the primary objective of this analysis was to highlight that a rate-based approach to achieving emission reductions from mineral fertilizer would be detrimental to the Canadian agricultural industry and global food supply,” the report states.

Fertilizer Canada Executive Vice President Clyde Graham said the association set out to assess what would happen to Canadian agricultural production if fertilizer applications were reduced 20%. “We certainly didn’t have the time or resources to do an exhaustive analysis of all the various options and behaviours that would occur,” he acknowledged, but “we think the report in its outcome is a fair representation of the impact of a 20% reduction in fertilizer use.”

Without the 20% reduction, MNP’s methodology assumed agricultural yields would continue to grow at the pace they’ve set over the last 20 years, despite the epic droughts farm producers have seen over the last few years in Quebec, and this past summer on the Prairies. That’s after this year’s devastating conditions across much of North America drew comparisons to the 1930s Dust Bowl.

“There’s been a lot of discussion about Canada becoming an agriculture superpower,” so “it’s a reasonable assumption that Canadian agriculture will continue to grow, and the foundation of that would have to be higher yields,” Graham said. “Certainly everyone is concerned about the impacts of climate change, but one drought is not indicative of a trend.”

Analysis released earlier this month by the UN World Meteorological Organization shows flooding increasing by 134% and drought by 29% since 2000, due to an “acceleration in the water cycle” that scientists have long warned would accompany global warming. While the assessment focused primarily on impacts in more vulnerable developing countries, the larger trend is that “the water is draining out of the tub in some places, while it’s overflowing in others,” said WMO Climate Program Director Maxx Dilley.

The acceleration in climate impacts is driving insistent calls to curtail emissions of all greenhouse gases—including nitrous oxide, which has been increasing at a pace consistent with 3.0°C average global warming by 2100. “Even though the magnitude of the emissions…is less, the potency of the gas is much stronger,” University of East Anglia scientist Parvadha Suntharalingam explained last year. “A little of it goes a long way.”

But Fertilizer Canada’s Graham said the association is satisfied to support intensity-based emissions—where farmers’ use of fertilizer becomes ever more efficient, but emissions increase if their output grows faster than their efficiency improves. “What we believe is that the approach is to reduce our nitrous oxide emissions per unit of grain or oilseed produced,” he told The Mix. “We think that is the best metric. That’s what we believe.”

Preston said that approach won’t go far enough, fast enough to address the biggest greenhouse gas pollutant in Canadian agriculture.

“From the research we’ve done in Canada and what we see in other jurisdictions, an intensity-based target for emissions from nitrogen fertilizer is not sufficient. It’s not going to work. If we’re going to address the climate crisis, we need to reduce absolute emissions.”

And that begins with wider cooperation, Preston added. 

“Farmers and researchers and people like Fertilizer Canada can work together to reduce emissions without reducing yields, and more important than that, without reducing farm incomes or damaging farmers’ livelihoods,” he said. “There is very, very strong evidence that those pathways exist, that there are options we can follow, but the scenario they lay out in the report is not one of them.”



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Climate & Society, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Climate Impacts & Adaptation, Ending Emissions, Food Security & Agriculture, Jurisdictions

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Peoplepoweredbyenergy/Wikimedia Commons
Ending Emissions

Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows

February 7, 2023
288
The hottest summer days in a typical New York City year are now about 11 times more frequent than in the 19th century. Image: Andreas Komodromos via Flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports

February 7, 2023
82
Andre Carrotflower/wikimedia commons
Severe Storms & Flooding

February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America

February 7, 2023
43

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Peoplepoweredbyenergy/Wikimedia Commons

Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows

February 7, 2023
288
Beckyq6937/Wikimedia Commons

Solar Geoengineering Banned in Mexico After ‘Rogue’ Stunt

February 7, 2023
130
Michael E. Brunk/flickr

Green Building ‘Heroes’, Climate Contrarian ‘Zombies’, Shell Lawsuits, and ‘Sponge Cities’ to Solve Flooding

February 7, 2023
103
Peter Broster/wikimedia commons

Ottawa Mulls Higher-Speed Trains on Busy Toronto-Quebec City Corridor

February 7, 2023
91
The hottest summer days in a typical New York City year are now about 11 times more frequent than in the 19th century. Image: Andreas Komodromos via Flickr

AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports

February 7, 2023
82
Brian Robert Marshall/Geograph

Canada’s Solid Renewables Growth Falls Short of Net-Zero Ambitions

February 7, 2023
75

Recent Posts

Andre Carrotflower/wikimedia commons

February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America

February 7, 2023
43
Nemaska Lithium/Facebook

Lithium Mine Divides Nemaska Cree Over Impacts, Benefits

February 7, 2023
28
Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

February 4, 2023
366
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
213
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
82
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
141
Next Post
TheKurgan/Wikipedia

World Fossil Production Still Far Beyond 1.5°C Limit, UN Agency Warns

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}