• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit August 15, 2022
Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature August 15, 2022
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

#Elxn44 Roundup: O’Toole Platform Cuts Climate Spending, Trudeau Emissions Plan Risks Provincial Pushback, and GreenPAC Endorses 35 Candidates

September 12, 2021
Reading time: 7 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

APTN National News/Twitter

APTN National News/Twitter

15
SHARES
 

Our continuing coverage of Canada’s federal election September 20 carries the #Elxn44 tag. You can use the search engine on our site to find other stories in the series.

The parties’ climate platforms received continuing scrutiny, GreenPAC released its candidate endorsements, new analysis put the cost of the Trans Mountain Pipeline close to C$20 billion, and regional reporting showed strong voter support for climate action as Canada’s federal election entered its final week.

The hours leading up to last week’s leaders’ debates saw the release of independent costing for the Conservative Party platform, courtesy of the Parliamentary Budget Office. The numbers told a sharply different story from the smiling, reassuring profile party leader Erin O’Toole had been projecting on the campaign trail, the Globe and Mail wrote in an editorial.

Through three weeks of “the most progressive conservative campaign since the demise of the Progressive Conservatives,” the editors said, O’Toole’s “style, tone, and (uncosted) platform were all about reassuring swing voters. A series of proposals, from health care to child care, were put forward to demonstrate that, while a Conservative government would be different from the past six years under the Liberals, it would not be too different.”

The Globe editorial identified child care funding, poverty reduction, and health care as areas with the greatest differences between the language and the numbers. But the Reuters news agency noted that O’Toole is also promising to cut the Liberals’ $2-billion budget for natural climate solutions, including Liberal leader Justin Trudeau’s long-standing pledge to plant two billion trees. Critics quickly pointed out that Doug Ford’s Conservative government attempted the exact same cut after it took power in Ontario, until the federal government stepped in and rescued a tree planting program that was already under way.

The Liberal platform did not come away unscathed, with economist Jennifer Winter concluding that Trudeau’s climate plan is needlessly vague. “The new promises are numerous,” she wrote for CBC. “However, the promises lack detail about implementation.” On emissions testing, fossil fuel subsidies, decarbonizing electricity, and more, “why shy away from what they’ve accomplished and what they intend to achieve?” she asked.

“In the end, the Liberal platform is remarkably similar to that of other parties. It’s more ambitious than the Conservatives, and less ambitious than the NDP or Greens. They happily occupy the middle ground on climate, and match the other parties on vagueness,” ultimately producing a document that is more confusing than informative, Winter wrote.

“Perhaps this reflects that climate policy is less of a wedge issue than in the past,” she concluded. “But if that’s the case, it’s hard to see why the Liberals don’t leverage their record and present a clear plan with detailed actions for climate policy in Canada.”

But on Corporate Knights, Sussex Strategies Senior Counsel Shawn McCarthy warned Trudeau’s aggressive plan to phase out greenhouse gas emissions in the oil and gas sector would set off renewed conflict with provincial premiers.

“After years of seeking to mollify the oil and gas sector, Justin Trudeau is promising to get much tougher with climate change regulations if his Liberal Party forms government again,” McCarthy wrote. Those pledges “would undoubtedly provoke renewed battles with conservative-led provinces, and potentially more court challenges from them.”

The Pembina Institute published an assessment of the four major parties’ climate platforms, with Federal Policy Director Isabelle Turcotte laying out four essential elements for any national climate plan: a shrinking carbon budget, a plan for the global decline in oil and gas demand, urgent action to decarbonize transportation, and climate action compatible with reconciliation with First Peoples. 

A 2030 carbon budget should put the country on a path to net-zero emissions by 2050 and “reflect the maximum allowable emissions for a specified period to keep Canada on track to deliver on targets, with the amount of emissions diminishing rapidly over time,” she wrote. And the transition plan to meet the coming decline in fossil demand “should be centred on workers and communities, providing them with a voice in their future, as well as direct support, retraining, and opportunities for historically marginalized communities.”

Global News has a summary of the parties’ position on single-use plastics, with the Liberals’ plan for a partial ban taking effect at the end of this year and the Green Party urging an end to all single-use plastics.

GreenPAC’s endorsements landed Saturday, with a total of 35 candidates—11 Liberals, 11 New Democrats, six Conservatives, four Greens, and three from the Bloc Québécois—receiving the nod. The endorsements were based on “candidates’ knowledge, experience, and leadership in their communities, workplaces, and parties for the environment and environmental justice,” as well as their winnability in their ridings, the organization said.

In British Columbia, meanwhile, West Coast Environmental Law is asking whether the next government in Ottawa will lift the curtain on the real cost of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, the Toronto Star reports. While the last official estimate put the price tag at $12.8 billion, WCEL says its tour through sworn affidavits and documents filed with the Canada Energy Regulator told a different story.

“We estimate that the cost of construction is now approaching $20 billion,” said study co-author Eugene Kung. While Trans Mountain hasn’t provided updated cost or scheduling information, WCEL estimated that project delays ranging from two to 23 months will postpone the pipeline’s completion to 2023.

“I was driving along the construction route this summer along the Coquihalla Highway, and the day before the July Mountain wildfire swept over the Coquihalla, I was right in a major construction zone that previously was active but had to be evacuated,” Kung told the Star. “That really brought it home, and, of course, the irony of trying to force through or rush through building an oil pipeline while the territory is burning was not lost on anyone.”

He said the federal Crown corporation responsible for building the pipeline has only been able to “maintain the illusion” that it’s on time and on budget by “skirting local laws”, requesting and receiving relief from the regulatory conditions on the project no fewer than 70 times.

Climate campaign organizations in B.C. have treating Trans Mountain as a top campaign issue after the Trudeau government bought out the original project developer, Houston-based Kinder Morgan Ltd., in 2018.

Elsewhere, news reports from Atlantic Canada and Saskatchewan show climate change continuing to shape Canadians’ voting preferences. In Halifax, a recent survey for the Future Ocean and Coastal Infrastructure project found that 73% of respondents in the Atlantic had noticed climate impacts in their communities, and 72% expected the climate crisis to harm them in their lifetimes.

“Recognizing the heavy cost of inaction, Atlantic Canadians want to see more environmental leadership from the government,” write Rachel McLay and Karen Foster of Dalhousie University and Howard Ramos of Western University. “Seventy-five per cent agree or strongly agree that Canada should take a leading role in tackling climate change. Crucially, people are looking for this leadership, regardless of any potential economic cost, and most see it as an economic benefit.” 

As well, “most Atlantic Canadians believe that, if environmental and economic considerations conflict, the environment must take precedence.”

Farther west, CBC says a “tumultuous summer of droughts and rising mercury” has made climate change a priority for many voters in Saskatchewan, with some of them saying federal parties are failing to grasp the severity of the crisis. 

“I would call myself undecided because I don’t think that any of the parties really are doing the best across the board when it comes to climate change,” said Regina voter Chris Harris.

“I see every day, as a medical student, people are coming in with allergy exacerbations because of the wildfire smoke that we know is climate-related. These are things that I’d love someone to address,” said fourth-year med student Sehjal Bhargava from the University of Saskatchewan.

“We’ve had successive governments talk about climate change during elections and then proceed to do next to nothing,” added Jim Clifford, associate professor of environmental history at USask, who told CBC that climate change has been his vote-determining issue for two decades. “We failed in Rio. We failed to meet our Kyoto Protocol and Copenhagen promise.”

With 10 days to go before the September 20 vote, Mainstreet Research Vice-President Joseph Angolano wrote Friday that Trudeau had pulled ahead of NDP leader Jagmeet Singh as the leader Canadians trust most on climate. The company’s polling showed Trudeau with the confidence of 31%, compared to 24.2% for O’Toole, 22.6% for Singh, and 8.4% for Green leader Annamie Paul. Across seven key issue areas in the campaign, Trudeau held small or occasionally large leads in voter confidence in five.



in Canada, Climate & Society, Energy Politics, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr
Oil & Gas

Alaska Fossils Announce New Extraction Project on North Slope

August 17, 2022
0
TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons
Energy Politics

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
748
Steve Jurvetson/flickr
International Security & War

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 15, 2022
2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
748
Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
437
/Pikist

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
221
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
157
UK Black Tech/wikimedia commons

U.S. Tech Workers Leaving High-Paying Jobs to Focus on Climate Crisis

August 15, 2022
122
United States Marine Core/Wikimedia Commons

Distributed Energy Gains Ground With Mobile Microgrids, Vehicle-to-Grid Technology

August 15, 2022
114

Recent Posts

Steve Jurvetson/flickr

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 15, 2022
2
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Arctic Warms 4 Times Faster than Global Average, Surpassing Estimates 

August 15, 2022
116
rawpixel

Common Medications Foil Body’s Ability to Cope with Hot Weather

August 15, 2022
92
Max Pixel

Slashing Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution Can Improve Crop Yields, Study Finds

August 15, 2022
50
David Hawgood/Geograph

E-Bikes a ‘Faster and Fairer’ Emissions Solution than Electric Cars

August 15, 2022
103
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region/wikimedia commons

Researchers Study Carbon Loss, Forest Impacts of Northwest Territories ‘Zombie Fires’

August 15, 2022
23
Next Post
drought crops

#Elxn44: Canadian Voters Demand Mitigation, Adaptation Strategies

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}