• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Insurers Could Boost Shareholder Value by Refusing Oil and Gas Projects, Bank Analysis Shows

August 26, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes

IRENA/Facebook

IRENA/Facebook

14
SHARES
 

The 10 companies that insure the lion’s share of oil and gas exploration and production could drop those high-carbon industries and increase their own shareholder value but are choosing not to, Bloomberg Green reports, in a summary of an analysis conducted by French investment banking giant Société Générale (SocGen).

The companies, including AIG, Travelers Cos., and Zurich Insurance, “account for about 70% of total underwriting,” Bloomberg Green reports, citing analysis by Insure Our Future. And the SocGen report indicated the insurers are a lot more important to fossil industries than the fossils are to the 10 companies.

“Premiums from insuring new oil and gas projects amounted to about US$1.7 billion in 2018, which equals just 0.1% of all property and casualty premiums,” Bloomberg writes. “This means the financial impact on insurers from restricting coverage for new capacity wouldn’t be very significant.

“In other words, insurers can afford to drop the world’s biggest perpetrators of climate catastrophe, but choose not to,” the news agency adds.

(With Canada’s Trans Mountain pipeline expansion just days away from the deadline to confirm adequate insurance for the next year, independent economist Robyn Allan said the SocGen analysis applies only to new oil and gas development, not existing infrastructure like TMX. “Trans Mountain is not an oil and gas project and the insurance package the company needs is related to the old pipeline,” she told The Energy Mix in an email. “The reason the company is having difficulty getting insurance is because of the risk of the aging pipeline, and would have little if anything to do with climate change per se.”)

So far, only one insurer, Australia’s Suncorp, has taken what SocGen insurance research director Nick Holmes called “significant action” to exit oil and gas, compared to 23 that are stepping away from coal. “For the insurance industry to fulfill its stated commitment to combat climate change, it may want to accelerate its efforts to exit the oil and gas industry,” Bloomberg writer Tim Quinson comments in response.

Holmes said that shift may be starting. “We feel momentum is starting to gather in this area,” he told Quinson, citing last month’s killer floods in central and western Europe that caused €6.5 billion in damage and shone a light on insurers’ direct interest in fighting climate change.

And there are choices the companies can make to protect themselves (and the rest of us). “Insurers can have a huge impact on the oil and gas industry by refusing to provide coverage for the very worst aspects of the industry when it comes to atmospheric and environmental destruction—oil and tar sands, oil shale, and Arctic drilling—and by refusing to insure new projects,” Bloomberg explains, citing the 26-page SocGen report.

The news story provides a quick overview of insurers’ response so far to fossil sector risk, with Axa and Swiss Re receiving highest marks for environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices among the 14 companies SocGen surveyed. The report says all insurers could earn a “green valuation premium” by restricting their oil and gas activities, with ESG factors reducing their assessed value to shareholders by as much as 3% or increasing it by up to 9%.

Société Générale increased Axa’s and Swiss Re’s valuations by 6%, Bloomberg says, and boosted its assessments of four other insurers—Generali, Zurich, Allianz, and Munich Re—by 5%.

But Insure Our Future Global Coordinator Peter Bosshard warned that the companies covered in the SocGen assessment still have a long way to go.

“Zurich, Allianz, and Axa, who have made numerous strong climate commitments, remain some of the world’s biggest oil and gas insurers,” he said in a release. “They have no excuse for enabling the continued expansion of fossil fuels. Ending cover for new oil and gas projects would not only protect the climate and their reputation; the Société Générale report makes clear that it would also increase their shareholder value.”



in Arctic & Antarctica, Climate & Society, Coal, Community Climate Finance, Fossil Fuels, Insurance & Liability, Jurisdictions, Oil & Gas, Shale & Fracking, Tar Sands / Oil Sands, UK & Europe

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

openthegovernment.org
United States

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
280
jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Energy Politics

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
135
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France
Nuclear

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
307

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
590
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
280
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
307
David Wilson/wikimedia commons

U.S. State Treasurers Use Public Office to Thwart Climate Action, Investigation Finds

August 7, 2022
133
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.6k
Green Energy Futures/flickr

Solar Shingle Buying Guide Lays Out Options for Curious Homeowners

August 7, 2022
146

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
135
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Canadians Share Stories of Fear, Vulnerability from 2021 Heat Dome

August 7, 2022
68
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 9, 2022
139
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Pacific Region/Wikimedia Commons

Australia Bans New Coal Mine to Protect Great Barrier Reef, Faces Call for Full Moratorium

August 7, 2022
78
The Come Up Show/flickr

Celebrities, Influencers See Backlash for Private Jet Emissions

August 7, 2022
63
alexxxis/Pixabay

Cambridge University to Rename BP Institute Following Student Backlash

August 7, 2022
48
Next Post
Alfred T. Palmer/Wikimedia Commons

Judge Cites ‘Striking Errors’ in Ruling Against German Coal Plant

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}