Wind and solar accounted for nearly all of the new electrical generating capacity installed in the United States between January and April this year.
The two clean energy technologies accounted for 93.84% of new capacity additions over the four-month span, PVBuzz Media reports, citing an analysis of U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) data carried out by the SUN Day Campaign.
- Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
- A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
- The Weekender:The climate news you need.
The latest edition of FERC’s Energy Infrastructure Update shows 18 new wind units bringing 3,802 megawatts of electricity onto the U.S. grid, followed by 131 new utility-scale solar installations adding 2,702 MW. Fossil gas accounted for 402 MW, followed by hydropower at 14 MW, oil at 6 MW, and biomass at 5 MW.
In April, all but one megawatt of new capacity came from wind (659 MW) and solar (147 MW).
“Utility-scale renewable energy facilities collectively now account for 24.77% of the nation’s total available installed generating capacity and continue to expand their lead over coal (19.28%), nuclear power (8.21%), and oil (3.14%),” PV Buzz writes, with solar supplying 14.96% and wind 10.24%.
While FERC reports a “high probability” that solar and wind will add about 63,000 MW by April 2024, “coal and oil are projected to plummet— by 25,171 MW and 3,354 MW respectively,” while nuclear is set to lose 3,256 MW, the news story states. While new gas plants will still be built, their “currently dominant share of total generating is forecast to diminish as the gap between the growth in new renewable capacity and new gas capacity continues to accelerate.”
PVBuzz helpfully explains the difference between a power station’s capacity and its actual output, which depends both on the number of megawatts installed and the percent of the time it can supply electricity. Due to the differences between the technologies, renewables accounted for 24.8% of installed capacity but 21.6% of total generation over the first three months of this year, while coal made up 19.3% of capacity but delivered 23.2% of the power.
[The renewables, on the other hand, accounted for zero cases of black lung disease, mountaintop removal, or safety violations leading to deadly mine collapses, and did not help fry the planet when used as directed.—Ed.]
Even with numbers that show renewables surging while fossil fuels fade, “FERC’s forecasts for strong growth by solar and wind over the next few years may actually prove to be quite conservative,” said SUN DAY Executive Director Ken Bossong. “Strong support from the Biden administration coupled with further declines in wind and solar costs, stronger state Renewable Portfolio Standards, expanding corporate renewable energy purchases, and public pressure to address worsening climate change are combining to accelerate an already fast-moving train.”
The president’s global-warming-alleviation plan should also include mass solar energy harvestation. For one thing, it may no longer be prudent to have every structure’s entire electricity supply relying on external power lines that are susceptible to being crippled by unforeseen events, including storms of unprecedented magnitude, especially considering our very vulnerable overreliance on electricity. (There also are coronal mass ejections to consider, albeit their damaging effects are rare, in which power grids are vulnerable to potentially extensive damage and long-lasting power outages.) Perhaps every residential/business structure could harvest at least some energy through solar cell panels, even if only as an emergency/backup source of power via independent storage system; albeit the idea likely would be opposed by various corporate interests.
If solar-panel universality would come at the profit-margin expense of the traditional energy production companies, one can expect obstacles, including the political and regulatory sort. If it notably conflicts with corporate big-profit interests, even very progressive motions are greatly resisted, often enough successfully. Of course there will be those, usually Internet trolls, who will mock the idea for ‘not being realistic’. One based his rebuttal solely on the erroneous notion that if it were possible to have such independent solar-power generation and storage, it would have been done by now and made a few people very wealthy. Unfortunately, when such illogic is widely believed, it’s much easier for some entity to maintain an outdatedly problematic but still very profitable status-quo energy system.