• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

New Study Outlines ExxonMobil’s Tactical Shift from Climate ‘Denial’ to ‘Ambiguity’

May 17, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes

ExxonMobil/Wikimedia Commons

ExxonMobil/Wikimedia Commons

 

The same Harvard historians who revealed a long campaign by ExxonMobil to suppress the connection between fossil fuels and climate change have released a new study that meticulously documents the colossal fossil’s latest self-preserving strategy: “a discourse of delay.” 

In their latest groundbreaking research, Geoffrey Supran and Naomi Oreskes describe how “Exxon’s change in rhetoric drew on tactics deployed by the tobacco industry to use ‘the subtle micro-politics of language to downplay its role in the climate crisis and to continue to undermine climate litigation, regulation, and activism’,” reports Inside Climate News.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

Rather than denying the climate crisis outright, Exxon shifted to ambiguity, the two researchers say. The company began, in the early 2000s, to systematically plant doubt about the best way forward, invoking global poverty when asserting the need to continue to use fossil fuels, insisting that technology will solve the problem, and shifting the burden of responsibility to the consumer. 

While it is hardly news that Exxon and other fossils “have framed climate change in these terms,” explains Inside Climate, what is news is the level of planning that Supran and Oreskes have revealed. 

“Our approach with all of this work is to look at the whole cherry tree,” Supran told ICN. “And when you do, the trends you observe are profound and systematic.”

Justin Farrell, an associate professor of sociology at the Yale School of the Environment, hailed the new study as “an excellent contribution to a growing body of text-based research on the tactics and frames used by the fossil fuel industry to shirk corporate responsibility, gaslight the public, and undermine regulation.”

Drawing on the same documents they studied in 2017—all created between 1972 and 2014—Supran and Oreskes used algorithms to analyze language choices in both internal and external documents. Particularly striking, reports ICN, was Exxon’s increasing (and increasingly sophisticated) use of the word “risk.”

The more the public turned up the heat about health concerns, the more liberally Exxon began to deploy the word “risk,” recognizing that the word has great power: It provides “just enough acknowledgment of the science to evade accusations of denial, without outright admitting that the industry had marketed deadly products,” writes ICN. A similar tactic, the researchers note, was used by the tobacco industry in the 1990s.

Inside Climate notes that the study hit the airwaves not long after New York City brought a lawsuit against Exxon, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, and the American Petroleum Institute, “accusing them of false advertising and deceptive trade practices in their messaging about climate change.” This is the second such lawsuit attempted by the city, and one of dozens now ongoing from various jurisdictions throughout the U.S. seeking to hold Big Oil to account for what Supran calls a “semantic infiltration” that has held back climate action.

Such shifting—even desperate—fossil tactics are also the subject of a new book just reviewed by Climate News Network. Crude Britannia: How Oil Shaped a Nation, by oil industry expert James Marriott and former Guardian energy editor Terry Macalister, reveals how Big Oil has made and broken political and economic systems all around the world—and still does, even as the industry enters its decline.

“As the book demonstrates, there has always been a revolving door between governments and the oil industry that allows powerful individuals to shape policy and wield undue influence,” Climate New Network writes.

Continue Reading



in Climate & Society, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Energy Politics, Fossil Fuels, International Agencies & Studies, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Oil & Gas, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
37
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
280

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
225
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
37
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
280
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
263
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
503

Recent Posts

Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
86
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
44

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
74
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
496

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
223
willenhallwench / Pixabay

Ontario Greenwashes with ‘Misleading, Illegitimate’ Emission Credits

January 16, 2023
314
Next Post
Joshua Doubek/Wikimedia Commons

Spain Sets Modest 2030 Emissions Target, Earns Praise for Banning New Fossil Permits

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}