• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022 January 31, 2023
Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB January 31, 2023
Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty January 31, 2023
Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds January 31, 2023
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Next
Prev

Alberta Hands Fossils a Price Break on Tar Sands/Oil Sands Cleanup Fund

May 10, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press @CdnPressNews with files from The Energy Mix
Primary Author: Bob Weber @row1960

Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons

 

Last year’s dive in oil prices has caused Alberta to change the way it calculates payments due from tar sands/oil sands mines make to ensure there’s enough money to clean up the mess they leave behind.

“The interim solution we’re putting in place addresses the impact of this temporary drop,” said Lisa Fairweather of Alberta Environment and Parks, the department that manages the mine security program.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

The program is intended to make sure the industry pays for its own cleanup when tar sands/oil sands mines close, The Canadian Press reports. Companies make annual payments into a fund held by the province.

Those payments were premised on companies maintaining three times as many assets as environmental liabilities. Failure to meet that target would force them to make extra payments.

However, for a brief period last year, oil prices crashed into unprecedented negative territory. That reduced the value of assets to the point at which companies would have had to pay “billions and billions” of dollars more, Fairweather said.

Prices have since rebounded and asset-to-liability ratios have recovered.

But companies, if they so choose, will have their 2020 payments assessed on a formula based on their revenue that doesn’t consider the overall value of their assets, CP says.

Fairweather emphasized the move is temporary. Energy Minister Sonya Savage has promised an overall review of the program this summer. The review is to be done by Alberta Environment.

The province’s auditor general has said the program is underfunded and leaves the province exposed to clean-up costs.

The program now holds just under C$1.5 billion—just under $1 billion from oil and gas companies—a small fraction of what remediation costs would be.

Martin Olszynski, a University of Calgary professor with expertise in resource law, criticized last Thursday’s announcement. The one situation that would have forced the industry to pay into the fund has now been nullified, he said.

“Why does this one (price) blip matter? The fund isn’t nearly big enough. Anything that puts more money in there is a good thing.”

Olszynski told CP there’s little need for a review of the security program. Plenty of research has already shown that Alberta needs better guarantees that resources will be there to clean up the landscape after the tar sands/oil sands are gone, he said.

“What’s the problem?” he asked. “Why shouldn’t (industry) put more toward this program that everybody knows is underfunded?

“We keep punting this issue down the road.”

In a release Friday, the Calgary-based Pembina Institute said the provincial announcement sends the wrong message.

“To date, the oilsands sector has only posted $0.9 billion of an estimated $31-billion liability,” said Nina Lothian, Pembina’s associate Alberta regional director. “This means that if anything happens to the sector, Alberta taxpayers could be on the hook for $30 billion of cleanup.”

The announcement “further erodes this inadequate system by lowering the oilsands operators’ security payments when times are tough—which is the opposite of what this program is designed to do,” she added. “The program is designed ‘to protect the public from paying the end-of-life project closure costs,’ in other words to ensure operators do not leave behind tailings ponds, disturbed landscapes, and industrial infrastructure.”

The main body of this report was first published by The Canadian Press May 6, 2021.



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, Climate & Society, Climate Impacts & Adaptation, Fossil Fuels, Health & Safety, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Mike Mozart/Flickr
Ending Emissions

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
325
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures
Canada

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE
Ending Emissions

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
325
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Canada, U.K., U.S. Must Cut Oil and Gas 76% by 2030 to Keep 1.5° Alive, New Analysis Finds

March 23, 2022
505
Nuclear Jordan/Facebook

TC Energy Wants to Supply ‘Small-Scale’ Nuclear Reactors to Alberta Tar Sands/Oil Sands

May 4, 2022
399
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
540
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing

U.S. Emissions Grow Only Slightly, Offer Hope for Meeting Paris Targets

January 12, 2023
79
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
324

Recent Posts

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
125
/snappy goat

Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds

January 31, 2023
94
Victorgrigas/wikimedia commons

World Bank Climate Reforms Too ‘Timid and Slow,’ Critics Warn

January 31, 2023
42
Doc Searls/Twitter

Guilbeault Could Intervene on Ontario Greenbelt Development

January 31, 2023
132
Next Post
Maxpixels

UN Urges 45% Methane Cut This Decade to Reduce Warming, Protect Health

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}