• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Alberta Coal Consultation Covers ‘Everything but What We Want to Talk About’, Local Landowner Says

April 19, 2021
Reading time: 5 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press @CdnPressNews
Primary Author: Bob Weber @row1960

Grassy Mountain Coal Mine

Keith McClary/Wikimedia Commons

 

A committee that is supposed to consult Albertans on coal development in the Rocky Mountains won’t be allowed to hear what people want to say about water and land use.

“The terms of reference say we’re consulting on everything but what we want to talk about,” said local landowner Kevin van Tighem.

That document, posted to a government website, says the five-member committee will only be able to consider issues under the control of the Department of Energy, The Canadian Press reports. “The committee will focus only on matters related to coal that are under the administration of the minister of energy,” the document says.

That means it will only be able to discuss matters that arise under legislation such as the Coal Conservation Act and the Responsible Energy Development Act. The panel won’t be able to consider concerns that would come under laws such as the Land Stewardship Act, which controls land use plans, or the Water Act.

“The vast majority of people are concerned about water and they’re concerned about protecting the Rockies,” said van Tighem. “We’re not allowed to talk about water and we’re not allowed to talk about land use.”

The panel was formed in response to a massive public outcry over the United Conservative government’s plan to dramatically expand open pit coal mining in the summits and foothills of the Rockies—one of the province’s favourite landscapes as well as the headwaters of most of its drinking water. Municipalities, First Nations, ranchers, and tens of thousands of Albertans have said they’re worried about the threat of water contamination posed by coal mining. Many fear permanent damage to an area of great scenic beauty. 

But the word “environment” appears nowhere in the four-page document outlining the terms of a panel that Energy Minister Sonya Savage promised would be “focused on the views of Albertans and making sure the government of Alberta has a fair understanding of what those views are.”

It is, however, heavily focused on gauging how much Albertans understand about current coal policies and regulations. It will ask if Albertans perceive their province as a responsible developer and if they’re aware of regulations that govern coal development. 

“I find it really condescending,” said Katie Morrison of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society. “As if the government is saying, ‘Clearly, Albertans don’t know what they’re talking about. If they only understood our regulations, they wouldn’t be so opposed.’ I don’t think that is true at all.”

As well, the government-appointed committee won’t have to report anything it hears outside the narrow scope it has been given. “The committee may post summaries online of input received from Albertans on matters within committee scope,” the document says.

As well, the document tasks the panel with “establishing relationships with Indigenous knowledge-keepers,” despite Savage’s promises of a government-to-government consultation.  

Alberta Energy did not respond to a request for an interview or comment on the terms of reference. 

“It will be very frustrating for a lot of people,” said High River, AB mayor Craig Snodgrass, whose town council has sent a letter to the government demanding an end to coal exploration.

Opposition New Democrat environment critic Marlin Schmidt said the document raises doubts about the consultation. 

“It’s clear that (Premier) Jason Kenney and the UCP have given this committee a mandate only to reach a predetermined outcome, which is expanded coal mining in Alberta’s Rocky Mountains and their watersheds,” he said in an email. 

“If Jason Kenney was sincere about consultation, he would halt all exploration activity. But the damage to Alberta’s natural spaces and watersheds continues as we speak.” 

Snodgrass said the panel is just the next step. 

“Albertans have to understand this is going to be a very, very long fight.”

On Friday, the province came under fire from municipalities for its approach to the issue. At the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association convention, Mayor Jim Willett of Coutts, AB asked Environment Minister Jason Nixon if his department would supplement the existing consultation plans, CP writes.

“We all thought a review of the coal policy would include a discussion surrounding water sources and usage and the land use act,” he said. “Is there a plan for another panel to discuss the points Albertans are most concerned about?” 

Nixon appeared to suggest there’s no need for one, saying the province’s water management is unchanged 

“Nothing has changed when it comes to water licences, water approvals, the Water Act or environmental legislation when it comes to water around coal,” he said. “All of the strict water rules remain within this province. They have not changed and they will not be changed in any way associated with coal.”

Willett, whose municipality is in south-central Alberta, called that a “non-answer.” He pointed out the government has opened discussions on water allocations in the area with a view to making the resource available for coal mines.

“We know it’s being discussed. And if it’s being discussed, why shouldn’t we have some input on it?” he asked. “Why is it such a narrow mandate that (the government) has given to the coal study group?”

Savage said concerns such as Willett’s “go beyond the scope of coal.”

“This engagement is focused on how the province manages coal resources,” she said.



in Canada, Climate & Society, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Coal, First Peoples, Fossil Fuels, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Bernard Spragg/flickr
Energy Politics

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
2
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons
Hydrogen

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
3
Protect The Planet
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
690
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
393
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.3k
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 9, 2022
203
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
372
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.7k

Recent Posts

Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
2
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
3
Protect The Planet

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
1

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
3
TheKurgan/Wikipedia

Ontario Pension Giant May Be Getting the Memo on Fossil Divestment, Members Say

August 11, 2022
1
@stan_sdcollins/Twitter

Stranded Communities Hope for Emergency Food Supplies as Newfoundland Wildfires Rage

August 11, 2022
3
Next Post
Florida Keys--Public Libraries/flickr

Florida Takes Climate Adaptation Funds Out of Affordable Housing Budget

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}