• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

‘Chaotic’ UK Retrofit Program a Cautionary Tale for Trudeau, Biden

April 14, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes

Low Energy Retrofit South Bucks/YouTube

Low Energy Retrofit South Bucks/YouTube

 

A failed attempt at a building energy retrofit program in the United Kingdom could offer lessons for governments in Canada and the United States as they prepare to launch their own plans.

The US$2-billion retrofit granting fund launched last fall in the UK went “very, very wrong,” reports Grist, thanks to a failure to consult with builders—who ended up being mobilized to do the work in an absurdly short time—and to the disastrously inefficient administration of the associated grant program.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

Unveiled last summer, Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s “build back better” stimulus package relied on retrofits as its beating heart. The plan promised to create 100,000 jobs and upgrade 600,000 homes, all while getting the country closer to its net-zero promises. 

The program was cancelled in late March “after a shambolic six-month run that may have killed more jobs than it spurred.”

Mapping the chaos, Grist writes that things began to go awry pretty much the moment the Green Homes Grants (GHG) initiative opened for business last September. Under the GHG program, “most UK homeowners and landlords could receive up to about $6,900 to help pay for insulation, electric heating systems, and various other energy-efficient fixes like new windows, doors, and heating controls.” Low-income homeowners could receive as much as $14,000.

Trouble was, in order to apply for a grant, the home or building owner had to submit a quote that had been calculated by an accredited installer. Few installers were accredited, and those who were not “were reluctant to go through the time-consuming and expensive process of getting accredited without a longer-term assurance that there would be work.”

They were right to be wary: homeowners lucky enough to actually hear back about their grant applications were frequently told their estimates were too high, and that a second opinion would be needed for approval. 

Plus, builders “had been burned before,” writes Grist. A similar UK retrofit program was cancelled in 2015 after just two years, “resulting in a steep drop in demand for this kind of work.” 

Builders (and homeowners) were also very poorly served by the bizarrely short timeline for the program, which was originally scheduled to end this March. 

While Johnson agreed in November to extend the funding through 2022, builders and homeowners were unimpressed with the concession. Any money unspent from the original fund was not rolled over, and several builders testified to the Environmental Audit Committee of the British Parliament “that a much longer-term commitment was needed to provide the certainty that the industry, and particularly small installers, needed to make the investment in accreditation.”

Then there was the “chaotic” administration of the program. Grist writes of homeowners “waiting months to hear back about their application,” with no way to call or speak to any administrators directly. 

Then, it got even worse.

“On December 24, the program sent notifications to thousands of applicants that said it was unable to verify their identity, and that their quotes were too high,” reports Grist. “Many homeowners dropped their retrofit plans altogether,” much to the dismay and anger of the installers who had been preparing for the work.

Those installers who did manage to proceed with projects and submit approved vouchers often found themselves waiting, with no sign of repayment. Grist cites a January report in The Guardian that spoke of installers being left “nearly $120,000 in the hole” and of being forced, in turn, to lay workers off. 

According to one installer who testified before the Environmental Audit Committee, participating in the GHG program reduced his revenue “by at least 40%” while increasing costs by a whopping 300%. 

Grist writes that the Environmental Audit Committee issued a “damning assessment” of the program in late March. The committee demanded that it be renovated, extended, and fully funded to provide “a genuine long-term stimulus to the domestic energy efficiency sector,” and warned that it “should not be scrapped or quietly wound down.” A few days later, the GHG program was indeed scrapped. 

The final tally of a sorry tale? Fewer than one-sixth of the targeted 600,000 homeowners applied for GHG vouchers, and of those, less than half received them. 



in Buildings, Climate & Society, Community Climate Finance, Demand & Distribution, Demand & Efficiency, Ending Emissions, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Renewable Energy, UK & Europe, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook
International Agencies & Studies

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
249
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
796
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel
International Agencies & Studies

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
74

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
530
Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
211
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
796
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
249
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 21, 2023
142
NTSB

Ohio Train Derailment, Toxic Chemical Spill Renews Fears Over Canada-U.S. Rail Safety

March 8, 2023
1.5k

Recent Posts

U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
74
FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
69
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 21, 2023
72
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
46
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
449
Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
51
Next Post
Wikimedia Commons

Non-Profit Law Centre Defends Quebec Campaigners from Pieridae ‘Gag Order’ Attempt

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}