• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit August 15, 2022
Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature August 15, 2022
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

‘No Means No’, Indigenous Groups Say, as Sweden Cancels Solar Geoengineering Experiment

April 6, 2021
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

Kreuzschnabel/Wikimeda Commons

Kreuzschnabel/Wikimeda Commons

 

The Canadian scientist behind a controversial attempt to combat climate change by dimming the sunlight reaching the Earth is vowing to keep at it after Sweden’s space agency decided last week to cancel what many critics considered a wildly untenable experiment.

The Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx) test this June, led by Harvard University researcher David Keith, “would have involved releasing a tiny amount of reflective material 20 kilometres (12 miles) into the atmosphere, to help researchers better understand how such ‘solar geoengineering’ might help cool the planet,” the Thomson Reuters Foundation reports. “Such technology mimics the cooling effect of volcanic eruptions and could reduce global temperatures—though its potential risks are unclear and it would not address other climate change-related threats, such as ocean acidification.”

But in the end, the publicly-owned Swedish Space Corporation (SSC) stepped away from the experiment. 

“There is no clear international consensus on the appropriateness of this type of research,” the agency said in a statement last Wednesday. “After discussions with Swedish experts and stakeholders, and in agreement with Harvard, SSC has decided not to conduct the planned test flight with a balloon this summer.”

That decision suited a growing roster of alarmed observers just fine.

“We are talking about a technology that could have extreme consequences, that could alter hydrological cycles, disrupt monsoon patterns, and increase droughts,” said Johanna Sandahl, president of The Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, the country’s largest environmental association. “It seems unmanageable and too dangerous to implement.”

Åsa Larsson Blind, vice president of the Saami Council, said technological fixes like solar geoengineering go “completely against what we need to do now—transform to zero-carbon societies in harmony with nature.”

“It shows there is simply no appetite for that technology,” added Lili Fuhr, a geoengineering specialist at Germany’s Heinrich Böll Foundation. “We don’t think it needs further research. We know enough about its dangers.”

Keith, a professor of applied physics at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, called the decision “a setback”, but told Thomson Reuters the test could still be carried out in the United States, though not until next year. “The project said it would use the coming months to try and win over opinion in Sweden and build support for an eventual test,” Thomson Reuters adds.

The Ottawa-based ETC Group published detailed responses from Indigenous partners, all declaring SCoPEx too dangerous to even test, much less implement.

“Solar geoengineering violates the worldview of the Saami people,” Larsson Blind said. “We welcome SSC’s decision to stop the balloon flight planned for Saami lands in Kiruna, but the existential risks of this geoengineering technology disqualify it from ever being advanced—whether here or elsewhere. The false argument that this treacherous technology could be a ‘Plan B’ is deeply dangerous. There is no safe or responsible way to deploy solar geoengineering technologies.”

“This technology is not a solution for mitigating climate change,” agreed Indigenous Environmental Network Executive Director Tom BK Goldtooth, adding that the Saami had never been consulted on the experiment. “It has too many risks that will violate the rights of the Saami Indigenous peoples and the delicate balance of the natural laws of Mother Earth and Father Sky.”

“This is at least the third time that SCoPEx has been halted on Indigenous territory. First in New Mexico, then Arizona, and now Sweden,” noted ETC Group Research Director Jim Thomas. “Each time, geoengineers promise to ‘consult’ better, deliberately missing the point that consultation does not equal consent. When communities and Indigenous people say no to planet-altering schemes being launched from their territories, it is disrespectful to mishear that as ‘needing more consultation’. No means no.”

The news and the intense pushback came just a week after the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine concluded the climate crisis is dire enough to warrant experimentation with a technology as extreme as solar geoengineering. 

“Supporting research into those possibilities shouldn’t be equated with actually implementing them, the NAS committee members involved with the report emphasized, adding that such studies should not detract from the need to cut greenhouse gas emissions,” Inside Climate News reports. “And scientists ‘need to be open to terminating’ geoengineering research if findings indicate that such manipulations of the atmosphere would carry undue risk of dangerous consequences, they said.”

But those are precisely the fundamental objections critics have raised in response to the prospect of even testing solar geoengineering—that hyped-up hopes of a high-tech solution would indeed delay decarbonization options that are already ready for prime time, that enough (or too much) is already known about the dangers posed by solar geoengineering, and that the technique could not be temporary once the Earth’s modified cycles became dependent on it.

“It’s kind of surreal to even be talking about this,” NAS committee member Ambuj Sagar, who studies science and technology policy at the Indian Institute of Technology, told Inside Climate. “You can’t be doing climate policy without thinking about geoengineering, and the more you get into it, the more complex it is. It raises all kinds of issues with international politics and governance.”

When those governance issues were last addressed in a United Nations forum, it didn’t go well.



in Climate & Society, Climate Action / "Blockadia", First Peoples, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Renewable Energy, Research & Development, UK & Europe, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons
Energy Politics

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
1
/Pikist
United States

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
2
Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons
Severe Storms & Flooding

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
3

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 14, 2022
614
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.7k
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
347
Muramasa/Wikimedia Commons

Newfoundland Wind Farm Would Power Coastal Green Hydrogen Plant

July 17, 2022
720

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
154
Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
291

Recent Posts

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
1
/Pikist

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
2
Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
3
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
1
UK Black Tech/wikimedia commons

U.S. Tech Workers Leaving High-Paying Jobs to Focus on Climate Crisis

August 15, 2022
1
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Arctic Warms 4 Times Faster than Global Average, Surpassing Estimates 

August 15, 2022
1
Next Post
ENERGY.GOV/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Jobs, Infrastructure Plan Aims to ‘Turbocharge the Transition’ Off Fossil Fuels

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}