• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit August 15, 2022
Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature August 15, 2022
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Alberta Calls for $30-Billion Carbon Capture Subsidy in Upcoming Federal Budget

March 10, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes

Peabody Energy, Inc./Wikimedia Commons

Peabody Energy, Inc./Wikimedia Commons

16
SHARES
 

The Alberta government is pitching for a 10-year, C$30-billion federal budget commitment to subsidize large-scale carbon capture, storage and utilization (CCUS) projects, even as the federal and provincial governments form a joint working group to develop CCS strategy for the fossil sector.

The two governments announced the working group Monday, just a day after the Globe and Mail broke the story on Alberta’s subsidy demand.

“There isn’t a pathway to net-zero without carbon capture—globally or in Canada, or anywhere,” Alberta Energy Minister and former pipeline executive Sonya Savage told the paper. “And if we’re going to hope to get to net-zero by 2050 we’re going to have to start working on it now.”

“The government of Canada has, of course, committed to very ambitious emissions reduction targets, and it’s our view that there’s no feasible way for Canada to achieve those targets within the stated timelines without a widespread application of game-changing technology like CCUS,” Kenney agreed at a news conference Monday.

The Globe reported on the subsidy demand based on a discussion document it obtained ahead of the federal budget that Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland is expected to unveil next month. It shows the $30-billion federal subsidy enabling Alberta industries to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 30 megatonnes over the next decade. 

(That would add up to a subsidy cost of $1 billion per megatonne, or $1,000 per tonne, proposed by the same provincial government that led the legal assault on a carbon price that was set to top out at $50 per tonne at the time the lawsuits were launched. In fairness, Alberta would expect the CCUS technology to remain in operation beyond that first decade, presuming that competing technologies and growing alarm about climate impacts haven’t tanked oil demand by then.)

“The document argues the Alberta industrial sector’s contribution to the national economy warrants the long-term investment from the federal government, and the country could become a global leader in the technology,” the Globe writes. “CCUS, the report said, would protect high-value, difficult-to-replace industrial jobs while also ‘greening’ them and ‘preserving valuable exports’” of Alberta oil.

Earlier this month, Natural Resources Minister Seamus O’Regan told the annual CERAWeek fossil industry conference that CCUS is essential to drive down oil sector emissions and support the development of “blue” hydrogen, the Globe writes. In contrast to “green” techniques that produce hydrogen from renewable electricity, “blue” hydrogen is derived from fossil fuels, with the resulting carbon emissions buried deep in the ground—then usually used to produce more oil through a process known as enhanced oil recovery.

“We’ve got decades of experience in CCUS and some real leadership in technology and innovation that we’re going to need,” O’Regan said. “We also have an abundance of the suitable geology that we need for CCUS for permanent storage, especially in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin.” With workers moving out of the oil and gas sector, he added, “we think that lowering emissions by having them work on CCUS projects is going to be really important.”

The Globe coverage traces the history of CCUS in Canada to date and acknowledges longstanding concerns about its high cost and limited benefit.

“Environmental groups have expressed concern a reliance on carbon capture is a means for extending the use of fossil fuel production, and say the money would be better spent on other renewable forms of energy,” the paper writes. “However, Alberta officials argue the process will be an important tool for reducing GHGs from the oil and gas industry—likely to be in business for decades more—and other major industrial sectors such as power generation, and chemical, fertilizer, and cement manufacturing.”



in Canada, CCS & Negative Emissions, Climate & Society, Community Climate Finance, Energy Subsidies, Fossil Fuels, Jurisdictions, Oil & Gas, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons
Energy Politics

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
748
Steve Jurvetson/flickr
International Security & War

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 15, 2022
2
/Pikist
United States

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
221

Comments 1

  1. David Langille says:
    1 year ago

    There are three good reasons why Ottawa should not use taxpayers money to subsidize the oil patch. It would promote private profit at public expense. It would only capture the emissions from production, and not from the consumption of the oil and gas overseas, where burning the fuel would still pollute our air. And it would be cheaper to invest in sustainable, job-creating alternatives like wind and solar energy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
748
Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
437
/Pikist

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
221
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
157
UK Black Tech/wikimedia commons

U.S. Tech Workers Leaving High-Paying Jobs to Focus on Climate Crisis

August 15, 2022
122
United States Marine Core/Wikimedia Commons

Distributed Energy Gains Ground With Mobile Microgrids, Vehicle-to-Grid Technology

August 15, 2022
114

Recent Posts

Steve Jurvetson/flickr

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 15, 2022
2
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Arctic Warms 4 Times Faster than Global Average, Surpassing Estimates 

August 15, 2022
73
rawpixel

Common Medications Foil Body’s Ability to Cope with Hot Weather

August 15, 2022
92
Max Pixel

Slashing Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution Can Improve Crop Yields, Study Finds

August 15, 2022
50
David Hawgood/Geograph

E-Bikes a ‘Faster and Fairer’ Emissions Solution than Electric Cars

August 15, 2022
103
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region/wikimedia commons

Researchers Study Carbon Loss, Forest Impacts of Northwest Territories ‘Zombie Fires’

August 15, 2022
23
Next Post
Nearly two years on from the tsunami

Japanese nuclear power station leaves toxic legacy

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}