• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

B.C. Pushes Forward with Site C Hydro Megaproject Despite $16-Billion Price Tag

March 1, 2021
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by Gaye Taylor

Jason Woodhead/flickr

Jason Woodhead/flickr

9
SHARES
 

Premier John Horgan has given the green light for work on British Columbia’s Site C hydroelectric dam to proceed, citing termination costs of more than C$10 billion and expert opinion that the geotechnical problems that have haunted the project can be fixed. Members of the West Moberly First Nations say they’ll see the province in court.

The decision to go ahead with the Peace River megaproject comes even as the province reveals that its costs have ballooned to $16 billion, virtually double the original estimate of $8.775 billion, writes CBC News. The new figure arrived with the recent release of former deputy finance minister Peter Milburn’s review of the project, which the province requested last year after BC Hydro expressed strong reservations about Site C’s “budget, schedule, and scope”, explains CBC.  

Horgan cited Milburn’s review as a chief impetus behind the decision to proceed, noting in particular that its 17 recommendations will eliminate the worry of “engineering bias”: that is, “the idea that no problem was so big it couldn’t be overcome,” CBC explains. An earlier report also confirmed that implementing stability and drainage solutions proposed by BC Hydro “would result in a project that meets Canadian Dam Association guidelines.”

While the province did not provide a full breakdown of costs, it said about 50% of the overruns can be attributed to geotechnical issues and the pandemic.

The Narwhal writes that the province won’t be releasing details about the other half of the overruns, because doing so “would create commercial risk for BC Hydro.”  

Also left unexplained is the shocking uptick in termination costs. Now estimated at $10.2 billion “in sunk costs, contract termination, and environmental remediation,” writes CBC, the potential cost of cancelling the project has soared well beyond the $1.8 billion estimated by the BC Utilities Commission in 2017. At this point, CBC says cancellation would “lead to BC Hydro rate increases of up to 26% for 10 years, or $216 per customer per year.” 

Both the provincial Liberal and Green parties criticized Thursday’s announcement. “Liberal energy critic Tom Shypitka argued that ‘although the Liberals started the project and supported its completion, it is the NDP that must wear the final costs’,” CBC writes. 

“They took ownership of the project, did their due diligence and signed off and said: ‘Yes, we’re going ahead.’ It’s their show,” Shypitka said.

Green Party Leader Sonia Furstenau rebuked the NDP for failing both its fiduciary duties and its responsibility to protect the environment. “We are going to lose an incredible amount of farmland, biodiversity, an entire river ecosystem for a dam that will produce energy at an astronomical cost,” she told CBC.

West Moberly First Nations Chief Roland Willson declared himself disappointed but unsurprised by Horgan’s decision. His community is suing the B.C. government, BC Hydro, and the Attorney General of Canada in civil court, arguing that “the construction of Site C is a violation of its rights set out in Treaty 8, signed in 1899 with First Nations in northeastern B.C., northern Alberta, and northwestern Saskatchewan,” CBC states.

The West Moberly suit is particularly concerned with BC Hydro’s plan to flood nearly 130 kilometres of the Peace River and its tributaries which fall largely within the Nation’s territory.

The Narwhal says BC Hydro’s own accounting predicts that Site C “will destroy 42 sites of cultural and spiritual significance to First Nations, including burial grounds, medicine collection areas, offering places for ceremonies and prayers, and locations associated with oral histories.”

It adds that a joint provincial and federal review panel “found the dam’s impacts on hunting, fishing, non-tenured trapping, and other traditional land uses would likely be adverse, significant, and impossible to mitigate.”

Union of BC Indian Chiefs Secretary-Treasurer Kukpi7 Judy Wilson said Site C “has never had the free, prior, and informed consent of all impacted First Nations”, adding that “B.C. did not even attempt to engage First Nations about the safety risks associated with the stability of the dam in the recent reviews.” 

Chief Wilson added: “It is unfathomable that such clear human rights violations are somehow okay by this government.”

The Narwhal says Site C “will destroy habitat for more than 100 species at risk of extinction”, adding that the “rare, low-elevation northern valley is a continental flyway for migrating birds who depend on its safe haven during extreme weather events in the spring and fall.”

Meanwhile, a working paper published late last year found that, at current costs, the dam cannot deliver enough benefits to justify its price tag. In a recent interview with Energi Media, study co-author and University of Ottawa climate and energy economist Nic Rivers explains that while Site C could provide “additional value” if it were used to help Alberta decarbonize its grid, those calculations were based on an estimated project cost of $11 billion. 

As study co-author G. Kent Fellows notes in a recent Twitter post, at $16 billion, “there is now no reasonable scenario wherein Site C will produce a net benefit.” 



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, Clean Electricity Grid, Climate & Society, Climate Impacts & Adaptation, Community Climate Finance, Demand & Distribution, Energy Politics, Environmental Justice, First Peoples, Hydropower, Jurisdictions, Renewable Energy, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Bernard Spragg/flickr
Energy Politics

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
2
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons
Hydrogen

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
3
Protect The Planet
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
690
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
393
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.3k
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 9, 2022
203
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
372
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.7k

Recent Posts

Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
2
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
3
Protect The Planet

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
1

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
3
TheKurgan/Wikipedia

Ontario Pension Giant May Be Getting the Memo on Fossil Divestment, Members Say

August 11, 2022
1
@stan_sdcollins/Twitter

Stranded Communities Hope for Emergency Food Supplies as Newfoundland Wildfires Rage

August 11, 2022
3
Next Post
Democracy Now!/Youtube

Lookback: Anjali Appadurai Speaks for ‘Silent Majority’ at COP 17

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}