• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update May 30, 2023
House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions May 30, 2023
13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires May 30, 2023
Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing May 30, 2023
Supreme Court Decision Undercuts U.S. Clean Water Act May 30, 2023
Next
Prev

Canadian Fossil Subsidies Tripled in 2020, Report Shows

February 26, 2021
Reading time: 5 minutes
Full Story: The Canadian Press @CdnPressNews with files from The Energy Mix
Primary Author: Mia Rabson @mrabson

Department of Energy/Flickr

Department of Energy/Flickr

71
SHARES
 

A new report suggests the economic impact of the pandemic led to a massive increase in federal aid to Canada’s oilpatch.

The annual inventory of fossil fuel subsidies published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) shows Canada spent at least C$1.9 billion in direct aid to the traditional energy sector last year, up from $600 million in 2019, The Canadian Press reports. More than three-quarters of that—$1.5 billion—was to help companies restore abandoned oil wells in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia. 

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

The report also highlights that almost all of the direct aid was paid out in two programs to protect jobs and cut greenhouse gas emissions, CP says. 

Another $320 million was aid to Newfoundland and Labrador’s offshore oil industry, which was hit hard last year by the pandemic and the oil price collapse in the spring. Report author and IISD policy analyst Vanessa Corkal said the oil recovery fund for the province was initially pitched in a way that would require it to show an environmental impact, but it’s not clear that’s happening. Most of that funding has yet to be committed.

The report presents a nine-point list of non-tax subsidies, three of them fully and one of them partly related to pandemic recovery, for which IISD could not quantify 2020 spending due to a lack of federal data. It includes:

• $13.2 billion per year in public finance, along with a potentially lucrative, pandemic-related loan guarantee program, through Export Development Canada;

• A pool of $675 million available to eligible onshore fossils and $75 million to offshore operators under the federal Emissions Reduction Fund;

• A $100-million low-carbon economy fund for Alberta;

• A corporate bond purchase program through the Bank of Canada for which 19 fossil fuel companies are eligible;

• Federal financial support for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.

While the federal government showed a new level of transparency in 2020 by releasing a list of the tax subsidies, Corkal told The Energy Mix, Ottawa is still “not actually being explicit about the amounts”. She added that the report excludes provincial subsidies directed to fossil fuel production, or aimed at reducing consumer energy costs during the pandemic.

The IISD release raises further questions about how to define fossil fuel subsidies, an issue Canada has not solved despite promising to eliminate “inefficient” ones for more than a decade now. “The problematic aspect is how do we make sure they’re not supporting future fossil fuel production,” Corkal told CP.

Canada first promised to eliminate inefficient fossil fuel subsidies as part of a G20 commitment in 2009, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau more recently set a target date of 2025 to do it.

But there is no set definition yet for what inefficient means. Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson says that in his view, programs that are good for the environment don’t count.

“Fossil fuel subsidies are those that are largely dedicated to either enhanced fossil fuel production or extraction,” he said in an interview with The Canadian Press Thursday. Wilkinson said he thinks most of the measures listed in the new report aren’t subsidies, including the funds to properly decommission abandoned wells.

“That, in my mind, is not a fossil fuel subsidy,” he said. “If you want to call it a fossil fuel subsidy then it’s not an inefficient fossil fuel subsidy. Those are things that are about environmental remediation. They’re about ensuring you’re putting people back to work while doing good things for the environment.”

Corkal said any kind of financial support to companies that produce fossil fuels could ultimately help those companies invest to produce more oil and gas. She said that just makes no sense when the government is trying to reduce that production by putting a price on the pollution they create when burned.

The report likens having subsidies and a carbon price to “trying to bail water out of a leaky boat.”

The G20 fossil fuel subsidy promise has led to multiple countries partnering up to do peer reviews of each other’s subsidies. The United States and China, Germany and Mexico, and Italy and Indonesia all completed their reports in 18 to 24 months.

Canada and Argentina agreed to a joint review in June 2018, but it’s still not finished. Wilkinson would not say when it might be done.

Corkal said it’s impossible to phase out anything until there’s a full picture of what exists.

Environment groups welcomed the orphaned oil well program last spring, believing it to be a better way to help the sector than subsidizing oil production. But Corkal said taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook for cleaning up orphaned wells permanently.

“Even if a subsidy has clear emissions reductions benefits, it’s ultimately still reducing the cost of business for fossil fuel producers,” she said.

President Joe Biden made eliminating fossil fuel subsidies in the United States an immediate priority. On his first full day in office, he directed all federal agencies to identify any direct federal spending on fossil fuels, and to eliminate any such spending from the budget next year.

By contrast, Corkal said a past IISD scorecard placed Canada dead last among G20 countries in its efforts so far to phase out fossil subsidies. “We need to see some movement, especially with the U.S. starting to make progress,” she told The Mix.

The main segment of this report by The Canadian Press was first published February 25, 2021.

Continue Reading



in Canada, Climate & Society, Community Climate Finance, Energy Subsidies, Fossil Fuels, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Shale & Fracking, Sub-National Governments, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

/Piqusels
Finance & Investment

Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update

May 31, 2023
402
Ryan Turnbull/Facebook
Legal & Regulatory

House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions

May 30, 2023
154
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr
Jobs & Training

Clean Energy to Add 700,000 New Jobs by 2050, with Alberta in the Lead

May 30, 2023
139

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

/Piqusels

Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update

May 31, 2023
402
Ryan Turnbull/Facebook

House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions

May 30, 2023
154
Neal Alderson/Twitter

Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax

May 29, 2023
2.4k
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

Clean Energy to Add 700,000 New Jobs by 2050, with Alberta in the Lead

May 30, 2023
139
Martin Davis/Facebook

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 30, 2023
540
York Region/flickr

Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 31, 2023
390

Recent Posts

David/flickr

Supreme Court Decision Undercuts U.S. Clean Water Act

May 30, 2023
64
Nicolas Rénac/Flickr

Climate Change to Cut Coffee Growing Lands by Over 50%

May 30, 2023
54
ValiGreceanu/Pixabay

Report Urges Tax Hike for Luxury Air Travel, ‘Pets on Jets’

May 30, 2023
54
Jörg Möller/Pixabay

UK Traffic Calming Strategy Produces Solid Results, Manufactured Anxiety

May 29, 2023
82

Waste Heat from Quebec Data Centre to Grow 80,000 Tonnes of Veggies Per Year

May 29, 2023
115
kpgolfpro/Pixabay

Community Wind Farm Earns Support, Generates Income in German Village

May 29, 2023
71
Next Post

UN survival plan offers new hope for the planet

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}