• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022 January 31, 2023
Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB January 31, 2023
Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty January 31, 2023
Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds January 31, 2023
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Next
Prev

California Senate Bill Would Halt New Fracking, Set 2027 ban

February 19, 2021
Reading time: 3 minutes

Joshua Doubek/Wikimedia Commons

Joshua Doubek/Wikimedia Commons

42
SHARES
 

Citing the “existential threat” of the climate crisis, two California senators have introduced a bill that would sharply curtail fracking in the state—and eventually ban it outright. And despite the predictable backlash from fossil interests, the bill makes explicit a commitment to a just transition.

The measure put forward by state senators Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Monique Limón (D-Santa Barbara) “would halt new fracking permits or renewals by January 1 and ban the practice altogether by 2027,” reports the Associated Press.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

“This is real. It is harming so many people, and the time to deal with it in the future is over,” said Wiener. The two sponsors of Bill 467 also plan to upgrade it “to halt new oil and gas permits within 762 metres of homes or schools by January 1.”

Fossil industry representatives have been quick to push back. “Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president and CEO of the Western States Petroleum Association, said the legislation was ‘so broad and ambiguous’ it would ‘lead to a total [oil] production ban in California’,” writes AP.

Once an oil heavyweight, California produced 394 million barrels in 1985. But in more recent years, production has fallen considerably. AP notes that the state “now ranks behind Texas, North Dakota, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Colorado, and Alaska” in oil production.

Even so, oil and gas remains a money-maker. The Guardian reports that the industry “generated US$152.3 billion in economic output in 2017, which generated about $21.5 billion in state and local taxes.”

In addition to offering hyperbolic statements of imminent economic collapse, Big Oil’s backers are trotting out their go-to defence, which could be loosely translated as “but we’re better than those other guys.” State Senator Shannon Grove (R-Bakersfield) told AP that, should the bill become law, California would be forced to “rely on foreign countries with dismal human rights records that barely let women drive and have little to no regard for the environment.”

In a similar vein, California Independent Petroleum Association CEO Rock Zierman told The Guardian that “shutting down energy production under the toughest regulations on the planet will devastate the economies of oil-producing regions…and make the Saudi royal family even richer, all while eliminating the industry that is investing in the innovation needed to significantly reduce the state’s carbon footprint.”

Republican Vince Fong, a member of the California State Assembly, told AP that he doesn’t “quite understand” why, “at a time like now, when we need to be revitalizing our economy…we would be pushing legislation that eliminates jobs in our state.”

But UPI reports that the bill, which is supported by the Center for Race, Poverty, and the Environment, “directs the California Geologic Energy Management Division to identify oil and gas workers who lose their jobs to the ban and offer incentives to contractors to prioritize their hiring.”

And there will be plenty of work to be done, observes AP, citing an assessment by the California Council on Science and Technology that California has “more than 5,500 oil wells that have likely been abandoned,” with a potential clean-up price tag reaching above $500 million. 

“It’s a declining industry,” Wiener told AP. “Instead of waiting for it to eventually decline and fall apart, let’s get ahead of it, facilitate the phasing out, and help the workers.”



in Climate & Society, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Fossil Fuels, Jobs & Training, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Shale & Fracking, Sub-National Governments, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Mike Mozart/Flickr
Ending Emissions

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
325
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures
Canada

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE
Ending Emissions

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
325
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing

U.S. Emissions Grow Only Slightly, Offer Hope for Meeting Paris Targets

January 12, 2023
79
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
324
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
122
/Pikrepo

Four Decades of Research Show Gas Stoves as ‘Overlooked’ Risk to Indoor Air, Child Health

December 7, 2020
1k
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Canada, U.K., U.S. Must Cut Oil and Gas 76% by 2030 to Keep 1.5° Alive, New Analysis Finds

March 23, 2022
505

Recent Posts

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
125
/snappy goat

Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds

January 31, 2023
94
Victorgrigas/wikimedia commons

World Bank Climate Reforms Too ‘Timid and Slow,’ Critics Warn

January 31, 2023
42
Doc Searls/Twitter

Guilbeault Could Intervene on Ontario Greenbelt Development

January 31, 2023
132
Next Post
Green Energy Futures/DSF

Missouri Solar Installer Reports ‘Overwhelming’ Interest as Customers Face Rolling Blackouts

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}