• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

‘Winners and Losers’ Mentality Blocks Success in International Climate Negotiations

December 18, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes

/PixHere

/PixHere

1
SHARES
 

The old idea that 30 years of largely failed international climate action amount to a “collective action problem” gets a fresh, new look in an opinion piece this week by Bloomberg Green sustainability editor Eric Roston.

“Climate change is frequently called a ‘collective action problem’, meaning that victory requires participation from everyone and that any diplomatic agreement must prevent and punish ‘free riders’, or countries that benefit from global progress without cutting their own emissions,” Roston writes. The notion traces back in part to Yale economist, avid carbon pricing proponent, and 2018 Nobel Laureate William Nordhaus, who asserted in 2015 that climate diplomacy is undermined by “the strong incentives for free-riding in current international climate agreements”.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

But while countries like the United States, Australia, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and others show up as “cheaters” within that framework, Roston notes that 75 countries announced more ambitious targets at the UN Climate Ambition Summit last weekend, capping a three-month span in which the European Union confirmed a 55% carbon reduction target for 2030, the UK set sights on 68%, China “shocked the world” by pledging carbon neutrality by 2060, and the U.S. elected a new administration on a platform that included a US$2-trillion climate plan.

“While still woefully insufficient, climate efforts are growing stronger, not weaker, the U.S. and other cheaters notwithstanding,” Roston writes.

“There’s a better explanation than free-riding to explain how countries negotiate,” he adds, citing political scientists Michaël Aklin of the University of Pittsburgh and Matto Mildenberger of the University of California, Santa Barbara. “The core problem negotiators face isn’t fear that other nations will betray them, it’s getting domestic support for their positions.” With the perception that climate policies will create economic winners and losers (notwithstanding $26 trillion in economic gains to be divvied up through 2030), “these potential winners and losers vie to control national discussions, and that’s primarily what guides the big talks”.

It’s that sense that climate action is about loss and pain (rather than opportunity and gain) that creates the most friction in international negotiations, Mildenberger told Roston. The focus on free-riders is no more than a “rhetorical flourish to disguise just outright opposition” from interests that expect to be disadvantaged by the drive to cut carbon. “By casting themselves as willing to cooperate under the right conditions,” Roston writes, “these officials are hiding the likelier fact that they are unwilling to cooperate under any conditions.”

But Aklin says the Paris Agreement has already changed that storyline, replacing past efforts to impose common rules on all countries with an aggregation of national carbon reduction promises, or Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), that provide a basis for collective action and peer pressure. In place of “the kind of straight jacket that was imposed in the past,” Aklin said, Paris has “allowed each country to focus on what they were good at.”

That shift will make climate action by key carbon polluters like the U.S., China, and India a more important story in 2021 than the remaining sticking points in the Paris deal, Roston says. “In the next phase of climate diplomacy, cheaters are only cheating themselves.”



in Climate & Society, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
6
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
264

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
264
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
253
James Vincent Wardhaugh/flickr

Canada Sidelines Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Approves Separate Mining Project

December 4, 2022
377
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
492
TALL ORDER -- A field of “Freedom” giant miscanthus on Mississippi State University’s South Farm towers over research agronomist Brian Baldwin. Baldwin’s 12-year study of grassy feedstocks indicates the plant is a viable resource for biofuel production. (Photo by MSU Ag Communications/Scott Corey)

Bamboo-like Crop Could Cut U.S. Midwest Warming by 1°C

May 4, 2022
958

Recent Posts

United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
6
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
188
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
84
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
43

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
72
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
493
Next Post
Ben Brooksbank/Wikimedia Commons

UK Supreme Court Approves Heathrow Third Runway, but Campaigners Say ‘Fight is Far from Over’

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}