• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Distraction, Not Biofuel, the Likely Output from Exxon Algae Initiative

November 5, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes

Andrea Pokrzywinski/Flickr

Andrea Pokrzywinski/Flickr

1
SHARES
 

ExxonMobil’s decade-old algae-to-biofuel venture is long on PR, short on research, and even shorter on proof that it will actually work, according to a recent expert assessment. But for a fossil giant seemingly set on greenwashing, that might be just fine.

E&E News writes that the technology to extract biofuel from algae is still “wildly expensive,” leaving ExxonMobil as the only major oil company still even bothering to look into it.

“It’s like I give you C$1 million and you convert it to $1 bills, and you light it on fire to make energy,” said Avigad Vonshak, a professor emeritus and algae expert at Israel’s Ben Gurion University. “I think it will be from stupid to nonsensical to believe that in any given time it will be an economically feasible process to extract fuels from microalgae.”

E&E writes that ExxonMobil’s interest in algae-based fuels began in 2009, “during a biofuels boomlet,” with the unveiling of a US$600-million partnership with California-based Synthetic Genomics Inc.

It was during this brief moment in the sun for ethanol that ExxonMobil “announced its foray into algae,” a venture premised on the fact that, unlike ethanol feedstocks like corn and sugar cane, algae “can be grown in arid conditions and in brackish water, meaning it is not competing for land with farmers growing food.” Biochemically speaking, the algae use photosynthesis to convert sunlight into lipids, which are then available to be used as fuel.

Getting to work in the lab, the Exxon-Synthetic partnership eventually (eight years later) figured out how to overcome one of the fundamental drawbacks to using algae as a source for fuel: in nature, the little single-celled organisms can grow either fat, or quickly—but not at the same time.

But as revealed in an ongoing study in Arizona, conducted by the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), huge challenges remain, notes E&E. One is that “high evaporation rates in arid regions can cause saline levels to rise to dangerous levels for algae, and removing the salt is expensive.”

Adding further significant costs, NREL found, would be the imperative to “dispose of the salty water by injecting it deep into underground wells, much as oil and gas drilling operations do.”

And even with no need to compete with farmers for space, land availability is still an issue, writes E&E. “NREL’s model for a commercial-scale algae facility calls for 5,000 acres of open-air algae ponds plus an additional 2,000 acres for support facilities.”

To top it all off, algae-to-fuel has terrible efficiency values. “ExxonMobil would need a facility at least NREL’s size just to reach its 10,000-barrel-a-day goal,” Vonshak said, a requirement that isn’t economically sustainable, and simply won’t work.

“The numbers don’t fit,” he told E&E.

Taking a similarly dim view of algae’s potential as a replacement for gasoline is Jeremy Martin, senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists. While noting that algae-based fuel “may yet become an alternative to high-value petrochemical products, which would aid the world’s attempts to green the economy,” he panned the idea that it could fuel transportation (even in the aviation sector) to any significant degree. “If this is their answer for liquid transportation fuels, it tells me they are not serious about replacing petroleum in this space,” he said.

Likewise skeptical is Brown University climate denial expert Robert Brulle. Noting that ExxonMobil’s $1.5 billion in spending on corporate promotion across all media since 2010 exceeds its investment in algae-based research, Brulle nonetheless believes that algae is serving a critical purpose for the company.

“They’re not selling you algae. They’re selling you ‘there’s good guys at Exxon’,” he said. Channelling the masters of the greenwash more fully, he added: “You don’t need to regulate us, you don’t need to sue us. We’re good guys.”



in Air & Marine, Auto & Alternative Vehicles, Climate & Society, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Demand & Distribution, Jurisdictions, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

openthegovernment.org
United States

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
50
jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Energy Politics

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
4
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France
Nuclear

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
11

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.5k
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
50
Noah Berger/flickr

Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe

August 2, 2022
569
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.2k
flickr

‘Big Wake-Up Call’ as Energy Crisis Makes Fossil Hydrogen a Bad Investment

July 20, 2022
997
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hit Wind Turbine Blade

December 22, 2021
653

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
4
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
11
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Canadians Share Stories of Fear, Vulnerability from 2021 Heat Dome

August 7, 2022
6
Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
10
David Wilson/wikimedia commons

U.S. State Treasurers Use Public Office to Thwart Climate Action, Investigation Finds

August 7, 2022
6
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 7, 2022
9
Next Post
Salam2009/Wikimedia Commons

California Wildfires Point to Perils of Forest Carbon Offsets

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}